- Thank you received: 0
Let's check for gravitational screening, simple...
21 years 11 months ago #3698
by Samizdat
Replied by Samizdat on topic Reply from Frederick Wilson
I am no benchtop experimenter, but this handicap does not blind me to the profound lack of physical demonstration of any of the ideas in this thread. The great physical ideas have always been formed through
rigorous tinkering (with the notable exceptions of SR and GR). Each element of the idea must be tested in the real world as the idea progresses. I seriously doubt that Marconi, Tesla, or any of the other great inventors built their devices by first going round and round about many untested and untestable ideas. They eliminated the inessential, irrelevant, and impossible, through *experiment* as they
built them.
Granted, I have been as guilty as all others here concerned, on these points, lest any of you think I excuse myself from the malaise. I have stated elsewhere, and repeat here, there are designs capable of being built, such as the Podkletnov. The literature on his work is
extant. So far the only people I see seriously working on it are the Boeing people. Their focus is anti-gravity, to the blind exclusion
of FTL phenomena. The better for others who would try to reach the finish line first. Fortunately, Podkletnov published his work *before* handing it over to Boeing. This does not mean that Boeing now has the rights to it. Why are we not using it *on the benchtop*?!
rigorous tinkering (with the notable exceptions of SR and GR). Each element of the idea must be tested in the real world as the idea progresses. I seriously doubt that Marconi, Tesla, or any of the other great inventors built their devices by first going round and round about many untested and untestable ideas. They eliminated the inessential, irrelevant, and impossible, through *experiment* as they
built them.
Granted, I have been as guilty as all others here concerned, on these points, lest any of you think I excuse myself from the malaise. I have stated elsewhere, and repeat here, there are designs capable of being built, such as the Podkletnov. The literature on his work is
extant. So far the only people I see seriously working on it are the Boeing people. Their focus is anti-gravity, to the blind exclusion
of FTL phenomena. The better for others who would try to reach the finish line first. Fortunately, Podkletnov published his work *before* handing it over to Boeing. This does not mean that Boeing now has the rights to it. Why are we not using it *on the benchtop*?!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 11 months ago #3591
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
Tell me where to show up and I am ready to start. Lets get organized. They did not build the a-bomb in a garage..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quantum_Gravity
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 11 months ago #3600
by Quantum_Gravity
Replied by Quantum_Gravity on topic Reply from Randall damron
are we taking microengineering here? if so then it is possible with a little funding and hard work, like the privat eventures from individuals who want to go out into spacxe with there own crafts.
The intuitive mind
The intuitive mind
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.288 seconds