- Thank you received: 0
Difference in gravity between night and day
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
20 years 3 months ago #10937
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
[Jim] "Is the difference in how high a body can jump at noon something that can be calculated and how?"
If you mean this literaly, then no. The difference in height of jump is so small that you could never verify that you got the right answer.
But the difference in force can be calculated. And a sensitive gravimeter can measure the change in the gravitational forces from Sol and Luna. And they agree.
[Jim] "Maybe NASA should change the blastoff timing of rockets to take advantage of this effect."
If such a well know effect (this is a type of gravitational sling shot) were large enough to be useful, they would already be using it.
If you mean this literaly, then no. The difference in height of jump is so small that you could never verify that you got the right answer.
But the difference in force can be calculated. And a sensitive gravimeter can measure the change in the gravitational forces from Sol and Luna. And they agree.
[Jim] "Maybe NASA should change the blastoff timing of rockets to take advantage of this effect."
If such a well know effect (this is a type of gravitational sling shot) were large enough to be useful, they would already be using it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 3 months ago #11444
by Don Omni
Replied by Don Omni on topic Reply from
Yeah, the starchutes out there have a rest lie of c^2 like in Archuleta Mesa, Mossadi Egypt, 'Atlantis' X, ZioNirvanAvalon and all missing s angular momentum from the h.e.r. They're using a locomotive combustion engine to hit a window to get to where they wannabe in space/time over the Van Allen belt. Sometimes they blow and come out all vaporized and mangled. So as much as it's like a slingshot, it's like a bullet with charge reaction whose displacement current is already being used by NASA to keep tabs with the shuttle with virtually zero loss, like a candid convo hf sound mc^2 pic.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 3 months ago #10940
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Very clear statement on how Gravitons work with in a flat space. Regarding curvature of space, I meant to say curvature of light or compactification of light around a center. After hearing your reasons, I agree space is flat and measured in straight lines between all objects. We are conditioned to say Curved Space. Space is not curved, light is curved.
Light has curvature because Universe Mass is polarized with electromagnetic fields and flows in vortical motion, and the motion is caused by a “Greater System” that also has rotation. With out rotation and spin, as so defined by our discussions of late there would not be spiral galaxies or jets of Anti Matter ejected from Mitchell stars, or pseudo singularities.
Here is where I disagree with the Standard Model: CPT violation is an artifact caused by A Priori thinking and interference from testing variables within the Mater half of Universe. You would have to actually leave this Relativity to test to see if Mater and Antimatter were actually symmetric. Matter is dominant atomic structure, has a Time direction, and the energy dynamics obey the laws of conservation of energy. Whereas Antimatter as you clearly stated is not normally found in this half of Universe because its function is to allow Time to exist by spreading relativity between polarities, and Time would not exist if it were not for Antimatter’s reverse time function. Time is a construct of relativities, and in the Matter Universe with right handed dominance, any deviation from reactions time variability is result of Left Handedness attempting to conform to Right Handedness which it cannot perform because of dominant Mater causing resistance within this Relativity. I know that you do not agree with what I am proposing, but you do agree with my freedom to explore new frontiers in thinking about science because I know that you too have fought against complacency with in present scientific inquiry. John
Light has curvature because Universe Mass is polarized with electromagnetic fields and flows in vortical motion, and the motion is caused by a “Greater System” that also has rotation. With out rotation and spin, as so defined by our discussions of late there would not be spiral galaxies or jets of Anti Matter ejected from Mitchell stars, or pseudo singularities.
Here is where I disagree with the Standard Model: CPT violation is an artifact caused by A Priori thinking and interference from testing variables within the Mater half of Universe. You would have to actually leave this Relativity to test to see if Mater and Antimatter were actually symmetric. Matter is dominant atomic structure, has a Time direction, and the energy dynamics obey the laws of conservation of energy. Whereas Antimatter as you clearly stated is not normally found in this half of Universe because its function is to allow Time to exist by spreading relativity between polarities, and Time would not exist if it were not for Antimatter’s reverse time function. Time is a construct of relativities, and in the Matter Universe with right handed dominance, any deviation from reactions time variability is result of Left Handedness attempting to conform to Right Handedness which it cannot perform because of dominant Mater causing resistance within this Relativity. I know that you do not agree with what I am proposing, but you do agree with my freedom to explore new frontiers in thinking about science because I know that you too have fought against complacency with in present scientific inquiry. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 3 months ago #11290
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
LB, Can you tell me where the gravity data you are refering to is located? And can that data be accessed?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 3 months ago #11291
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Hi Jim,
I'm not relying on data. At least not on the kind of data you are talking about. I'm relying on my training, my understanding of that training (both it's strengths and it's weaknesses) and on various papers, articles and books I've read over the decades. And my ability to plug the occasional numbers into the gravitational force equations, etc. to do specific spot checks of someone's numbers.
But I have no desire to spend the better part of a decade learning how to check the detailed work of thousands of competent technicians and scientists.
Sorry. I know that this (checking them) is what you want to do very badly. I can't imagine why, but if that is your passion I say go for it.
LB
I'm not relying on data. At least not on the kind of data you are talking about. I'm relying on my training, my understanding of that training (both it's strengths and it's weaknesses) and on various papers, articles and books I've read over the decades. And my ability to plug the occasional numbers into the gravitational force equations, etc. to do specific spot checks of someone's numbers.
But I have no desire to spend the better part of a decade learning how to check the detailed work of thousands of competent technicians and scientists.
Sorry. I know that this (checking them) is what you want to do very badly. I can't imagine why, but if that is your passion I say go for it.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 3 months ago #11185
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
You say data is avalable and I only want to know where it is. Why do you guys always say data exists and then deny ever seeing it?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.340 seconds