- Thank you received: 0
Derivation of Lorentz Transformation
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
18 years 9 months ago #17307
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Graviton absorption by MI's has an interdependent relationship to electromagnetic directional flux fields. So that the earth's electromagnetic field is caused by graviton inflows, but also the field itself exhibits a minimal effect over the direction of graviton wind and inflows. This would as Thomas has stated effect time dilation, the Atomic potential and its radiative forces. Directional curvature of the Graviton Wind would have a small dilation effect upon time on any given motion of object against flow of gravitons with an increased absorption rate by MI's.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 6 months ago #10665
by ebg
Replied by ebg on topic Reply from
Special relativity divides into two parts, integers and intervals. Moreover, time dilation, itself, depends on time intervals, or time measured perpendicular to the direction of motion. Unfortunately, most arguments against time dilation give evidence of time integers parallel to the direction of motion; falling victim to Lorentz's many versions of unknows: "X", "x", "x'", and "X'".
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 6 months ago #15233
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by ebg</i>
<br />Special relativity divides into two parts, integers and intervals. Moreover, time dilation, itself, depends on time intervals, or time measured perpendicular to the direction of motion. Unfortunately, most arguments against time dilation give evidence of time integers parallel to the direction of motion; falling victim to Lorentz's many versions of unknows: "X", "x", "x'", and "X'".<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">None of your sentences make sense. Start by explaining in plain English what your first sentence means. While you are at it, what have integers to do with special relativity?
We have trouble with spambot invasions here from time to time, so kindly explain yourself so you are not booted on suspicion of being one. -|Tom|-
<br />Special relativity divides into two parts, integers and intervals. Moreover, time dilation, itself, depends on time intervals, or time measured perpendicular to the direction of motion. Unfortunately, most arguments against time dilation give evidence of time integers parallel to the direction of motion; falling victim to Lorentz's many versions of unknows: "X", "x", "x'", and "X'".<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">None of your sentences make sense. Start by explaining in plain English what your first sentence means. While you are at it, what have integers to do with special relativity?
We have trouble with spambot invasions here from time to time, so kindly explain yourself so you are not booted on suspicion of being one. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 6 months ago #10681
by ebg
Replied by ebg on topic Reply from
Well Tom, thank you, but I'm not a "spambot". I will respone during the work week before friday. However, time is short tonight as I responded to another posting first.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.275 seconds