- Thank you received: 0
pushing gravity
19 years 6 days ago #13079
by nemesis
Replied by nemesis on topic Reply from
Tom, is the energy deposited by gravitons the source of the excess heat observed in the planets? The gas giants radiate more energy than they receive from the sun.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 6 days ago #14313
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nemesis</i>
<br />Tom, is the energy deposited by gravitons the source of the excess heat observed in the planets? The gas giants radiate more energy than they receive from the sun.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Probably yes. See my chapter in <i>Pushing Gravity</i> for a table of predicted and observed excess heat flows and a plausible explanation linking them. -|Tom|-
<br />Tom, is the energy deposited by gravitons the source of the excess heat observed in the planets? The gas giants radiate more energy than they receive from the sun.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Probably yes. See my chapter in <i>Pushing Gravity</i> for a table of predicted and observed excess heat flows and a plausible explanation linking them. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 6 days ago #13040
by nemesis
Replied by nemesis on topic Reply from
Thanks Tom, I must get ahold of a copy of Pushing Gravity. But one more question for now, if this is the case, then shouldn't graviton absorpsion be a major power source for the Sun and other stars?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 6 days ago #14456
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nemesis</i>
<br />shouldn't graviton absorpsion be a major power source for the Sun and other stars?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Yes, and the source of atomic energy such as alpha and beta decay, orbitals, and spontaneous photon emission. -|Tom|-
<br />shouldn't graviton absorpsion be a major power source for the Sun and other stars?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Yes, and the source of atomic energy such as alpha and beta decay, orbitals, and spontaneous photon emission. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 6 days ago #13041
by nemesis
Replied by nemesis on topic Reply from
How is this different from Paul LaViolette's mechanism? I read that he proposes that only 1/3 of the Sun's energy source is from fusion (no more solar neutrino problem). I think he discusses this in his book Subquantum Kinetics, which I have not read, but would probably be too technical for me in any case.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 11 months ago #17035
by Sir_Zerp
Replied by Sir_Zerp on topic Reply from Michael
The peanut butter question.
If space was peanut butter, would it be smooth or chunky style???
Zerp's Universal Law --- Dude, The Hot Side Faces Away From the Gravity Well ---
If space was peanut butter, would it be smooth or chunky style???
Zerp's Universal Law --- Dude, The Hot Side Faces Away From the Gravity Well ---
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.284 seconds