Is the Meta Model necessary?

More
15 years 1 week ago #23183 by JoeP
Replied by JoeP on topic Reply from
Mark,

Are you suggesting that there are situations where an otherwise-massive photon would not exhibit mass?
If so, can you describe a couple of these situations?

Thanks.


-Joe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 1 week ago #23861 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
LB, According to NASA the moon is receding 3.8 centimeters per year as per the redshift. How did you determine your figures? Its kind of important to know which method is used to make this estimate. I get so many details mixed up and when one can be set right the attempt is worthwhile. As you know in my world the moon is in a common orbit with Earth rather than a run away satellite of the Earth so this is much more interesting to me than perhaps to you and others.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 1 week ago #15189 by JoeP
Replied by JoeP on topic Reply from
Jim,

I made a correction to #3 and #6 in my post from Oct.31. Although I know that you're not keen on defining acceleration in a spatial way -temporal only- I wanted to notify you just the same.


-Joe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 1 week ago #23184 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
JoeP, You still miss my point about effects induced by acceleration. Maybe its wrong and only my problem,but, the effects of acceleration are more than just a change in motion. I get this idea from a new rendition of Planck's Law which has been kicked around in another thread on this site several years ago. It seems to me energy has many properties that are hiden in the dogma of the day.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 1 week ago #23111 by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by JoeP</i>
<br />Mark,

Are you suggesting that there are situations where an otherwise-massive photon would not exhibit mass?
If so, can you describe a couple of these situations?

Thanks.


-Joe
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Joe,

Photons only exhibit mass when measured (wave particle duality)

Mark Vitrone

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 1 week ago #15190 by JoeP
Replied by JoeP on topic Reply from
Jim,

It is possible, even anticipated, that a specific property would work in concert with other properties. If acceleration changes, then other factors might change with it, each in its own proportion.
Energy is all-important. Energy is the life of every property. No-energy = no-property.

Pray, tell us, what is this new rendition of Planck's Law.


-Joe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.397 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum