Tom Sir,
After 26 yrs study and 40,000 books read and uncounted websites, my latest conclusion about gravity is:
"Gravity is what space does...that is, vortexing space implodes and expands and collects mass in its centers". I also regard
Charles Brush's 1930's Shadowing Theories,
Gematric (Geometric) Phi Implosion Theories,
my own 4th dimension/0-Dimension Gravity and
the Anu Building Block Theory as the Aether Medium,
as valid premises to be associated with gravitational characteristics.
Tom, if relativity must use Elysium local gravitational fields which seems to force a 3 dimensional relativity upon the 4 dimensional Aether of pure, virgin space, what is the superior technique of using Einsteins 3 dimensional relativity over the 4th dimensional Quaternion maths of the Aethers universal gravitational field:
"Gravity is what space does...that is, vortexing (curved) space implodes and expands, when in Phi ratio, by way of the Anu medium, instantly and collects mass in its centers".......
Met
MetPhys@aol.com
rgrace@rgrace.org
www.rgrace.org/index.html
Impossible Correspondence
**********
Originally posted by Meta
Why are you using the word Elysium to describe the medium of space, or the non-medium if you want to be very technical, when there is already a word for this, which is Aether. Are you saying Elysium and Aether have two different meanings?
Yes. Aether provides a universal rest frame. Elysium is entrained by masses, so every local gravity field is a local rest frame, and as good as any other. So elysium obeys the relativity principle, whereas classical aether does not.
The origin of the word is the phonetic similarity of "elysium" to "LCM" for "light-carrying medium". Also Elysium Fields were a feature of Greek mythology, and our elysium is apparently identical to the local gravitational potential field. So both usages are closely associated with fields. -|Tom|-
