- Thank you received: 0
Quantum extension of the Meta Model
20 years 10 months ago #7745
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
OK, I'll assume the sililarity is just me- so what are the two particles that I am asking about?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 10 months ago #7747
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />OK, I'll assume the sililarity is just me- so what are the two particles that I am asking about?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Could you be asking about neutrinos? I mentioned earlier how those might arise in this model. If their masses are too small to hold significant elysium atmospheres, they will appear to have zero charge. -|Tom|-
<br />OK, I'll assume the sililarity is just me- so what are the two particles that I am asking about?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Could you be asking about neutrinos? I mentioned earlier how those might arise in this model. If their masses are too small to hold significant elysium atmospheres, they will appear to have zero charge. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 10 months ago #8179
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
In one of the posts above there is a reference to two particles with mass of ~10E-31 & 10E-38 kg. I just wonder what they are all about? I may not have been clear about the source and assumed anyone would know it was a reference to this thread-I can't explain why I assumed that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 10 months ago #7843
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />In one of the posts above there is a reference to two particles with mass of ~10E-31 & 10E-38 kg.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I don't know where Don found that second number, what he calls the "elyson mass". It might have come from an estimate I made in one of the EME Notes.
Don, if you're reading this, where did you get that value?
BTW, an elyson is not a "photon". Photon is the name given to a lightwave by those who hold that light has a mixed particle-wave nature. An elyson is the tiniest constituent making up the wave. We have no current knowledge about how elysons are composed, so the mass of the elyson is just a number to which we cannot presently attach any physical significance. -|Tom|-
<br />In one of the posts above there is a reference to two particles with mass of ~10E-31 & 10E-38 kg.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I don't know where Don found that second number, what he calls the "elyson mass". It might have come from an estimate I made in one of the EME Notes.
Don, if you're reading this, where did you get that value?
BTW, an elyson is not a "photon". Photon is the name given to a lightwave by those who hold that light has a mixed particle-wave nature. An elyson is the tiniest constituent making up the wave. We have no current knowledge about how elysons are composed, so the mass of the elyson is just a number to which we cannot presently attach any physical significance. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 10 months ago #7814
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
What ever you call it I have a similar idea about waves and particles of energy and as I see it the problem goes back to the begining of QM with the Planck Constant. The wave nature and particle nature of energy are the result of two scales-the Planck bundle and the componants of the bundle. So, as I see it what you call something others call something else. The confusion is in the Planck Constant.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.234 seconds