- Thank you received: 0
Space, time and matter
19 years 9 months ago #12443
by Messiah
Reply from Jack McNally was created by Messiah
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rush</i>
<br />I'm carrying on a discussion with a friend of mine about time and its relationship to matter and space.
Is there any way that time can be independent of matter? That is just what my friend is arguing. He says that while matter/space depends upon time to exist, time does not depend upon matter/space to exist.
I can't see how that can possible be true for we observe time as motions of material objects...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Actually time is the measurement of change. Motion is only one type of change.
<br />I'm carrying on a discussion with a friend of mine about time and its relationship to matter and space.
Is there any way that time can be independent of matter? That is just what my friend is arguing. He says that while matter/space depends upon time to exist, time does not depend upon matter/space to exist.
I can't see how that can possible be true for we observe time as motions of material objects...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Actually time is the measurement of change. Motion is only one type of change.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 9 months ago #11013
by rush
Replied by rush on topic Reply from
In Einstein's relativity time seems to be a physical "thing", because it can be dilated. But how a thing that has no physical properties can be dilated?
In Lorentz's relativity there is an absolute time and what really change due to motion is the internal process of clocks used to quantify the passage of a relative time. But this also assumes there is an inobservable physical quantity (absolute time) that has no physical properties!
Tom Van Fladern, could you clarify those ideas to me?
In Lorentz's relativity there is an absolute time and what really change due to motion is the internal process of clocks used to quantify the passage of a relative time. But this also assumes there is an inobservable physical quantity (absolute time) that has no physical properties!
Tom Van Fladern, could you clarify those ideas to me?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 9 months ago #11014
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rush</i>
<br />In Einstein's relativity time seems to be a physical "thing", because it can be dilated. But how a thing that has no physical properties can be dilated?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It can't.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">In Lorentz's relativity there is an absolute time and what really change due to motion is the internal process of clocks used to quantify the passage of a relative time. But this also assumes there is an inobservable physical quantity (absolute time) that has no physical properties!<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">True.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">could you clarify those ideas to me?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Time is just a dimension measuring change. As such, we are free to construct it in any way we wish. Why would we construct it to have rate variations? That would be senseless. -|Tom|-
<br />In Einstein's relativity time seems to be a physical "thing", because it can be dilated. But how a thing that has no physical properties can be dilated?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It can't.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">In Lorentz's relativity there is an absolute time and what really change due to motion is the internal process of clocks used to quantify the passage of a relative time. But this also assumes there is an inobservable physical quantity (absolute time) that has no physical properties!<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">True.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">could you clarify those ideas to me?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Time is just a dimension measuring change. As such, we are free to construct it in any way we wish. Why would we construct it to have rate variations? That would be senseless. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.240 seconds