- Thank you received: 0
To coin a phrase.... MetaTechnology
- PheoniX_VII
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
18 years 7 months ago #10398
by PheoniX_VII
Reply from Fredrik Persson was created by PheoniX_VII
The first thing that comes to mind is faster then light travel, and possibly even faster than gravity travel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 6 months ago #10642
by modu
Replied by modu on topic Reply from
Hi Mark
not exactly what you had in mind, but following this site for the past few months there is an expriement that come to mind.
1. according to "clasical gravity", a given mass (mass "A") will exert gravitional pull on mass "B" proportionaly to the distant between the center of mass A and mass B.
therefore if we take a long cilinder object and place it horizantly over another object (the center of the cilinder object "close" to secondery object) we should get bigger gravitional pull then if we placed it verticaly over the object (the center of the cilinder object "far" from secondery object)
2. according to "push gravity", gravitional force is pushing and get blocked by a mass.
therfore placing the cilnder object horizantly over a secondery object will block less graviton coming from above then placing it verticaly, in which case the results should be the exact oposit of exp. 1
A. is that correct?
B. was it tried?
modu
not exactly what you had in mind, but following this site for the past few months there is an expriement that come to mind.
1. according to "clasical gravity", a given mass (mass "A") will exert gravitional pull on mass "B" proportionaly to the distant between the center of mass A and mass B.
therefore if we take a long cilinder object and place it horizantly over another object (the center of the cilinder object "close" to secondery object) we should get bigger gravitional pull then if we placed it verticaly over the object (the center of the cilinder object "far" from secondery object)
2. according to "push gravity", gravitional force is pushing and get blocked by a mass.
therfore placing the cilnder object horizantly over a secondery object will block less graviton coming from above then placing it verticaly, in which case the results should be the exact oposit of exp. 1
A. is that correct?
B. was it tried?
modu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Peter Nielsen
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 6 months ago #10654
by Peter Nielsen
Replied by Peter Nielsen on topic Reply from Peter Nielsen
The best approach to realizing Phoenix VII's dream of "faster then light travel, and possibly even faster than gravity travel" would be some sort of light(EMR)/gravity wave surfboard that takes energy from those waves by riding on/repelling them . . .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 6 months ago #10656
by modu
Replied by modu on topic Reply from
Hi Peter
Your approach is the same as as trying to move through the atmosphere using sounds wave (which i dont think will be very practical).
in my opinion the only way its to find that elusive medium (esylum) and then find a way of manipulating it, very much like a jet in the air or a boat in water.
modu
Your approach is the same as as trying to move through the atmosphere using sounds wave (which i dont think will be very practical).
in my opinion the only way its to find that elusive medium (esylum) and then find a way of manipulating it, very much like a jet in the air or a boat in water.
modu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 6 months ago #10662
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by modu</i>
<br />placing the cilnder object horizantly over a secondery object will block less graviton coming from above then placing it verticaly ... is that correct?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">No, gravitons are so ultra-tiny and matter is so transparent that every atom is equally accessible to gravitons. So the shape of the body doesn't matter. Gravity's push is equal on every atom individually, so it doesn't matter how many atoms there are or how they are arranged. -|Tom|-
<br />placing the cilnder object horizantly over a secondery object will block less graviton coming from above then placing it verticaly ... is that correct?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">No, gravitons are so ultra-tiny and matter is so transparent that every atom is equally accessible to gravitons. So the shape of the body doesn't matter. Gravity's push is equal on every atom individually, so it doesn't matter how many atoms there are or how they are arranged. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 6 months ago #10667
by modu
Replied by modu on topic Reply from
Hi TVF
thanks for your reply
I wasnt refering to the shape of the object in general, my idea is changing the size/mass of the object in a GIVEN DIRECTION, which certainley should make a different, otherwise (to be completley simpleton) replacing the moon with a tenis ball should have no effect on earth gravity ?!!
modu
thanks for your reply
I wasnt refering to the shape of the object in general, my idea is changing the size/mass of the object in a GIVEN DIRECTION, which certainley should make a different, otherwise (to be completley simpleton) replacing the moon with a tenis ball should have no effect on earth gravity ?!!
modu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.449 seconds