The patch work done on redshift is what I am complaining about. The Hubble redshift can be caused by velocity as per all the models you are using. Or Hubble redshift can be caused by other factors not in the current theories. You say the redshift is caused in part by atoms being slowed down and data is available in GPS that proves this is true. I find no data indicating the emission of photons from atoms is slowed because the atom has been moving at a faster rate despite GPS. You then say I'm at fault for this becuse I'm too uneducated to access the data which is fine with me because I can deligate that to someone better qualified to access the data. Still no data seems to exist to prove anything and that is the real issue here not which model is better. For me money none of the models are worth the time spent on them. Data is ignored when ever it misfits the model and only when it can be massaged to suit tthe model is data accepted.
