- Thank you received: 0
The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
12 years 6 months ago #13789
by Jim
Reply from was created by Jim
So, what happens to all the extra mass a star has? All the planets are much smaller in mass than even small mass stars.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 years 5 months ago #13798
by Jefferoo
Replied by Jefferoo on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />So, what happens to all the extra mass a star has? All the planets are much smaller in mass than even small mass stars.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The mass was never there to begin with.
1. True mass of "Sun" is 2.82 * 10^23 kg based off density measurements of photosphere in accordance to homogeneous sphere as based off measurements of global harmonic oscillations (helioseismology recordings) of 2 hours and 40 minutes and its moment of inertia as a celestial sphere of .059, meaning it is undifferentiated.
2. True mass of "Sun" is 3.61 * 10^23 kg based off empricial measurements of tidal force exerted by the Sun as opposed to the Moon, which is roughly 2.21 times as strong, using Newton's equation for Force = G((M1m2)/d^2).
Both of these mean the Sun is very diffuse ball of plasma. It is not the supermassive 333,000 times the mass of Earth ball mainstream has taught based off mathematical models for the supposed requirements for stellar fusion. Hydrogen fusion is simply not happening in the sun. It resemble an arc welding torch more than an nuclear furnace. It should be no surprise that the surface is around the same temp as an arc welder.
You can do anything you put your mind to.
<br />So, what happens to all the extra mass a star has? All the planets are much smaller in mass than even small mass stars.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The mass was never there to begin with.
1. True mass of "Sun" is 2.82 * 10^23 kg based off density measurements of photosphere in accordance to homogeneous sphere as based off measurements of global harmonic oscillations (helioseismology recordings) of 2 hours and 40 minutes and its moment of inertia as a celestial sphere of .059, meaning it is undifferentiated.
2. True mass of "Sun" is 3.61 * 10^23 kg based off empricial measurements of tidal force exerted by the Sun as opposed to the Moon, which is roughly 2.21 times as strong, using Newton's equation for Force = G((M1m2)/d^2).
Both of these mean the Sun is very diffuse ball of plasma. It is not the supermassive 333,000 times the mass of Earth ball mainstream has taught based off mathematical models for the supposed requirements for stellar fusion. Hydrogen fusion is simply not happening in the sun. It resemble an arc welding torch more than an nuclear furnace. It should be no surprise that the surface is around the same temp as an arc welder.
You can do anything you put your mind to.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 years 5 months ago #21416
by Jefferoo
Replied by Jefferoo on topic Reply from
It should be no surprise they are trying to find the "extra mass and energy" of the universe. They created the mass in math formula. It never existed in the first place.
You can do anything you put your mind to.
You can do anything you put your mind to.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Solar Patroller
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 3 months ago #21690
by Solar Patroller
Replied by Solar Patroller on topic Reply from
You're talking about plasma cosmology and the electric universe proposed by Perratt, Scott, and Talbot and Thornhill. Very good that you point it out.
However, your signature statement is irrational and unrealistic, which is how orthodoxy is.
However, your signature statement is irrational and unrealistic, which is how orthodoxy is.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.324 seconds