Well again you have hit upon the crux of the problem with the speculation going on throughout this thread. While I'm not a mathemetician I have always looked at the math imposed on the cydonia site with skepticism simply because there are perceived point that "should" exist but are for the most part eroded away so it becomes a best guess point to work from.
There is no real proof of a "crater" on the face so it becomes a best guess from which to work from.
There is no real proof that the face is composed of metal so it becomes a best guess from which to work from.
There is no real proof that the face is a hollow structure so it beomes a best guess from which to work from.
There is no real proof that the face is mirror-symetrical so it becomes a best guess from which to work from.
There is no real proof the the face is bi-furcated so it becomes a best guess from which to work from.
There is no real proof that you, I, TVM, ZM, MSSS, NASA has the correct skills to process images so it becomes a best guess from which to work from.
There is just too much me-ism in this whole thing, my Nefrititi is better than your bi-furcated face... in the end analysis that position is just plain BS especially when so many so-called rules are twisted and distorted to arrive at the conclusion acceptable to the writer.
The simple fact remains that no matter how much so-called "scientific method" you claim to apply that the conclusions of the paper discussed above are based on speculation and not proof of any kind. That no matter how much you rail and ridicule the bifurcation of the face that little else remains as a possibility if you don't introduce the speculation of a meteor hit and melting of an "imagined" metal coevering.
A SERIOUS SCIENTIFIC MIND would do everything possible to explore the possibilities of the opposite position simply to bolster their own theories. What has occurred to this point is little more than accusations and half hearted efforts to make other ideas look silly.
So TVM et al I challenge you all to read the book Cydonia Codex (as I have read your material) work through the examples and test the theory, test the theory, test the theory... before dismissing the idea out of hand with I won't even read the thing if it contains anything that is mirrored.
We are in a real fight today with science as a whole and real discoveries are being cast by the wayside with a simple 'it doesn't fit the accepted paradigms' just ask Michael Cremo author of Forbidden archaeology. Closed minds are dangerous, we are not supposed to be of that type but sadly I find that the anomaly community has minds that are closed tighter than mmost of that which we rail against as keping us back... we are keeping ourselves back.
I want to apologize here in advance as I am leaving on an extended trip and while on the road expect to have intermittant internet access so I won't be able to respond here until the end of May. but I leave you with my favorite adage from Brian Tracy "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still" I don't expect to change your opinions but I do know that if somebody has new information they can change their minds, please seek some new information you really don't know it all!
Jim Miller, You can find anything if you want to!
Topic Author
