- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
10 years 1 month ago #22374
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />rderosa - marsevidence01
You guys are funny.
Still, I enjoy looking over the shoulder of two reasonably (or at least apparently) competent individuals as they slap each other around.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I think it's a blessing that you're around to keep the ad-hominems in check. It forces one to answer the actual message. It's good practice.
rd
<br />rderosa - marsevidence01
You guys are funny.
Still, I enjoy looking over the shoulder of two reasonably (or at least apparently) competent individuals as they slap each other around.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I think it's a blessing that you're around to keep the ad-hominems in check. It forces one to answer the actual message. It's good practice.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22408
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
We can all thank Tom for setting it up this way.
He was a serious genius.
He was a serious genius.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pareidoliac
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22466
by pareidoliac
Replied by pareidoliac on topic Reply from fred ressler
rd- Brother from a previous life. I too can forget. I Apologize just like Apollo under orders from der ... mainly because words mean nothing to me accept for "word" as it actually describes itself.
Yes Ayn Rand was a genius as are we all before they put us in school.
Chang Tzu or some brilliant sage said the greatest gift is to be considered weak and stupid and perhaps have a hunch back as that will keep you from being conscripted by the military and it's tributaries. If one has vision one sees the slave/ slave- master system for what it is. All one needs is a roof over ones head and bread and the kingdom of god will follow. I forget the genius who said that. We are stimulated to see division.
It takes being a lying hypocrite to make any more money than one needs. "To lead- one must lie". Thank god for Grigori Parelman the man who knows he controls the universe just like you and I do. Read P.D.Ouspensky? David Bohm, Karl Popper, Walter Benjamin and everything else and it all points to different realities to each of us.
I was raised o think that it was positive to make money. I was taught that being rich and famous was positive. I thought if I ever came up with something it would be appreciated. I did . You see the response I get. Some day people will see the value in pareidolia and how the money system hid it under me a old uneducated (artistically) so no one would find it. One can make stinking money doing anything except being a pareidoliac. Money and God are anti-thetical. So is money and pareidolia. I thank god. I want no more money than I absolutely need. Excess money is sacrilegious. We are 100 trillion in debt to 3 people. You dig it? This machine even doesn't recognize the word spelling of PAREIDOLIA. Got gave me the greatest gift in the world = pareidolia. The gift of quiet appreciation in the art world.
saint-lucy.com/essays/referential-mania/
Yes Ayn Rand was a genius as are we all before they put us in school.
Chang Tzu or some brilliant sage said the greatest gift is to be considered weak and stupid and perhaps have a hunch back as that will keep you from being conscripted by the military and it's tributaries. If one has vision one sees the slave/ slave- master system for what it is. All one needs is a roof over ones head and bread and the kingdom of god will follow. I forget the genius who said that. We are stimulated to see division.
It takes being a lying hypocrite to make any more money than one needs. "To lead- one must lie". Thank god for Grigori Parelman the man who knows he controls the universe just like you and I do. Read P.D.Ouspensky? David Bohm, Karl Popper, Walter Benjamin and everything else and it all points to different realities to each of us.
I was raised o think that it was positive to make money. I was taught that being rich and famous was positive. I thought if I ever came up with something it would be appreciated. I did . You see the response I get. Some day people will see the value in pareidolia and how the money system hid it under me a old uneducated (artistically) so no one would find it. One can make stinking money doing anything except being a pareidoliac. Money and God are anti-thetical. So is money and pareidolia. I thank god. I want no more money than I absolutely need. Excess money is sacrilegious. We are 100 trillion in debt to 3 people. You dig it? This machine even doesn't recognize the word spelling of PAREIDOLIA. Got gave me the greatest gift in the world = pareidolia. The gift of quiet appreciation in the art world.
saint-lucy.com/essays/referential-mania/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22375
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
I just looked at 10 images at random on the HiRise website and they were all 1 x 1 binning, ~26cm/p, images approx. ~80cm resolved (approx 32 inches). Yes it's true about the fact that there are images that have been combined into super pixels, but as a general rule they do that for a purpose, and they are usually not concerned about the slight loss of resolution (if we took a picture of a car, would it matter if there were 7 million or 9 million pixels? Probably not).
So, the simple fact of the matter is that there are probably thousands of 1 x 1 binning images from the HiRise, and yet we're still squinting to see what in fact you claim you see. It's actually gotten quite boring.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> However, I have been working with some new 3D software recently which has produced much greater clarity. I will be posting a few intriguing 3D videos for review shortly.Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I wait with baited breath...<i>YAAWWWWNNNNNNN</i>
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">...3D IS the only way to go....Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And yet we're still squinting.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">depth of field IS everything and shows far greater resolution. Now if we can only get HiRise to acquire 1 X 1 binning in the stereo files of the places of REAL interest.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It's not gonna matter.
rd
[/quote]<font size="1"></font id="size1">
Oh yes it will!
Like I said, the regions I have found of interest (and most do not) are either 2D images (no stereo companion) or have one file captured at 1 X 1 binning and the other 2 X 2 binning which would resolve to around 170cm resolution across (70").
The problem you are having here frankly, is that you are still looking for an image that resembles a car or a familiar "thing". Shame really as anything that looks potentially artificial, you pass right on bye. You need to both open your eyes AND your mind.
But the dissonance you are experiencing is a super safety net of sorts and is quite understandable.
Btw, that yawn of yours....sounds scary...make sure you put your hand over your mouth like Mommy said to ok? Just kidding of course Rich [)]
Malcolm Scott
So, the simple fact of the matter is that there are probably thousands of 1 x 1 binning images from the HiRise, and yet we're still squinting to see what in fact you claim you see. It's actually gotten quite boring.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> However, I have been working with some new 3D software recently which has produced much greater clarity. I will be posting a few intriguing 3D videos for review shortly.Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I wait with baited breath...<i>YAAWWWWNNNNNNN</i>
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">...3D IS the only way to go....Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And yet we're still squinting.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">depth of field IS everything and shows far greater resolution. Now if we can only get HiRise to acquire 1 X 1 binning in the stereo files of the places of REAL interest.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It's not gonna matter.
rd
[/quote]<font size="1"></font id="size1">
Oh yes it will!
Like I said, the regions I have found of interest (and most do not) are either 2D images (no stereo companion) or have one file captured at 1 X 1 binning and the other 2 X 2 binning which would resolve to around 170cm resolution across (70").
The problem you are having here frankly, is that you are still looking for an image that resembles a car or a familiar "thing". Shame really as anything that looks potentially artificial, you pass right on bye. You need to both open your eyes AND your mind.
But the dissonance you are experiencing is a super safety net of sorts and is quite understandable.
Btw, that yawn of yours....sounds scary...make sure you put your hand over your mouth like Mommy said to ok? Just kidding of course Rich [)]
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22376
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />We can all thank Tom for setting it up this way.
He was a serious genius.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Yes he was and is sorely missed!
Malcolm Scott
<br />We can all thank Tom for setting it up this way.
He was a serious genius.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Yes he was and is sorely missed!
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22409
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<b>[pareidoliac] "I Apologize ... mainly because words mean nothing to me ..."</b>
I have to be the hard ass in situations like this, because it's a part of the job of being a God. (Not that I don't enjoy the role, he he
***
So I have to ask:
Is it possible for you to find a way to say it that sounds less sincere?
***
Richard - if this is acceptable to you I'll accept it as well. But I recommend he be required to word it differently.
I have to be the hard ass in situations like this, because it's a part of the job of being a God. (Not that I don't enjoy the role, he he
***
So I have to ask:
Is it possible for you to find a way to say it that sounds less sincere?
***
Richard - if this is acceptable to you I'll accept it as well. But I recommend he be required to word it differently.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.446 seconds