My pareidolia knows no bounds.

Not to belabor the point and risk being smitten but i have no idea if rd wears the $ sign and in all honesty was not thinking of him when i made the comment.

Fair enough.

I guess I need to amend the Big Rule to include personal attacks on anyone, even if they have not posted here. Their messages, of course should still be fair game.

A message can be wrong, or incomplete and so on.
A messenger can be silly or an idiot and so on.

You are allowed to mention the former.
You are not allowed to mention the latter. (I almost decided to keep you from even noticing, but then decided to leave your free will alone.)

Any comments?

And in the spirit of individualism and freedom, there will be no ex-post-facto smiting.

Neutral or positive intent free of negative emotion should be the accepted agreement generally. How about slightly modifying English and avoid terms such as wrong, idiot and so on. How about looking at everything as being created by something much more intelligent/ complex/ perceptive than woman/man- call it random/ god/ allah/ unknown/ void/ un-namable etc. We just found out about DNA (how that for complexity) and how to put wheels on luggage. Maybe we should all lighten up and see everything as following a perfect flow pattern. My contention is that paradolia shows an example of perfect flow patterns and there is infinite knowledge displayed by them. Pattern and consciousness is all we have for sure andpareidolia is a pattern seen by man on to of the material mechanical obvious pattern. The obvious pattern must be based on it's fuction. The pareidolic pattern is free of function. It's main function if for man to see he creates what he sees.
Whatever- still the best pareidolia blog on the web. Thanks God and rd and all. Even the dude who said i should man up and get a 40 hour a week job. i try to keep it as close to 6 hrs. a year as possible like Bucky Fuller says is equitable. Was that you God?
Larry?
Interesting article on my point of view of quantum reality. Pretty much a combination of Bohm/ Perelman/ Coltrane/ Bruce Lee/ Billie Holiday/ Lester Young/ Van Gogh/ Rembrandt/ DaVinci/ RamaKrishna/ Dali/ Dolphy/ Monk/ Ives etc. and a few things of my own.

blogs.scientificamerican.com/critical-op...ysicist-basil-hiley/

<b>[rderosa] "This seems simple enough to understand, but for the most part, Liberals never get it."</b>

I have no doubt that they do in fact get it. But they enjoy watching conservatives go apoplectic when they pretend to not get it.

Conservatives are mostly nice people but not especially smart.

Liberals, on the other hand, tend to be very smart and very mean.

***

"Obama is an idiot" is a classic ad-hominem. It might be allowed in a court of law, but I have some actual standards.

***

Hmm. I might go play with the cuss filter. perhaps I can make it do some work for me. I think it can be set to replace word "x" with word "y" rather than just block word "x".

So if word x = "idiot", I might be able to have the cuss filter replace it with word y = "((poster hereby certifies that he is a d*mb*ss")).

Sort of an "auto-smiter".

Chuckle.

You are certainly right about the drift ...

More to follow.

I would like to get a little feedback on this image file and ask if anyone can see anything a little odd in the escarpment located in Hebes Chasma?

[/URL]

Malcolm Scott