My pareidolia knows no bounds.

Pareidolia has a different aspect from each of our vantage points. i see it as created by the viewer. Please check out the three frames before "Lila" and the one after.(At bottom of page). Can you see from my point how i saw the first "Lila" aspect image and was rewarded with increasing magic till the image started to break down in frame five. Click on thumbnails to enlarge. Bottom of page photos. beyondpareidolia.shutterfly.com/ "Einstein" was the ultimate reward in a similar process. i would like to see what it would take to come up with a more complex pareidolic example. (i recently applied to Guinness World Book of Records for most complex pareidolia. Who knows when pareidolia will be seen as something other than a joke or curiosity. There is something deeper than the obvious everywhere. Pareidolia is one of the most extreme example of freedom from merely functional form. Magical/ meaningful patterns pointing to the reality that we all create what we perceive. (from my vantage point).

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by pareidoliac</i>
<br /> Can you see from my point how i saw the first "Lila" aspect image and was rewarded with increasing magic till the image started to break down in frame five.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Wow, that's amazing. OK, from the point of view of doing it frame by frame, I'd say a good camera would probably give you more to work with. I forgot you were doing that.

rd

Definitely. Rapid fire camera with criss-crossing foliage.

1/10 of one percent? No way!

Have you ever used the Browse Map?
Quote rd:

I stand corrected Rich...I was on my way out the door. I meant to say 1\10 of one percent of the surface in high resolution images.



Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />I meant to say 1\10 of one percent of the surface in high resolution images.

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">OK, that's probably true. So basically your hope (contention) is that hi res will reveal the truth. Maybe. We thought that was a distinct possibility also, but so far re-imaging past famous artifacts from the MOC discoveries have been largely dissappointing and non-confirmational (did Ijust make that word up?).

But you're right about that part so there's still hope.

rd

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by pareidoliac</i>
<br />Definitely. Rapid fire camera with criss-crossing foliage.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I got you. Do you have one?

rd