- Thank you received: 0
Absorbtion and Emission in QED
20 years 6 months ago #9711
by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
If you carefully read my interpretation of QED, you will find that it sidesteps all of your well founded criticisms.
mhelland@techmocracy.net
mhelland@techmocracy.net
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 5 months ago #9776
by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
Ok, so I've picked up on the fact that my little explanation of these things is hard to understand. Here is a more playful way of making my point. Comments welcome:
We start with an angel named Steve.
Being that Steve is an angel we know that he is not made of the matter we observe. Also, he does not exist in the time or space we observe. This is cool because that means Steve does not abide to the laws of physics we know of and we are free to invent new laws of physics for him. Here:
1. An angel may still move by inertia
2. Angels cannot see other angels
3. There are baseballs flying around this angel-world which an angel can catch if they cross paths
4. When an angel catches a baseball his speed and direction changes based on the speed and direction of the incoming ball
5. The angel then throws the baseball, without a specific target he just chucks it randomly
Ok, so Steve is chilling, and all of a sudden he catches a baseball. His speed and direction adjusts, and then he throws the ball.
Let's now say this has continued for a while. Steve has been catching, adjusting, and throwing and the results of his adjustments have managed to group together a handful of angels in a collection. Sort of like how gnats seem to keep a swarm together, somehow the specific rules of how an angel reacts and adjusts by catching a baseball have managed to swarm together some angels. These angels still don't see each other or interact with each other through any mechanism except for the baseballs being tossed around.
During all of this the angels are pretty manageable. The direction the balls are coming from vary, naturally, as the positions of the angels in the group are always changing, but they are still somewhat predictable.
All of a sudden a baseball comes from somewhere totally unexpected. This confuses Steve. There must be something out there besides his known group in the local vicinity.
Through only ball speak Steve manages something pretty incredible. He and his buddies arrange themselves into a sophisticated configuration. This configuration enables them to coordinate the throws of their baseballs in some general direction. They are able to catch external baseballs from some general direction and through a sophisticated network of internal throws they are able gather and store information about these external catches. They are even able to compute based on this information.
What type of computations are performed? Say they throw a large number of baseballs in a general direction, and a number of baseballs comes back from that direction. The computer realizes there is another group of angels out there refracting back a fraction of the balls thrown at it. The computer can take the data of successive throws and catches to estimate the size and shape of the other group, triangulate its distances, and approximate the speed and direction of the group at large.
This is a good deal of information that arises from the network of angels. However, despite how much interesting information can be gathered this way, there are still limits to how specific the information can be. For example, if it takes multiple throws to determine the position, direction, and speed of a specific angel, after every throw the angel will have changed its position, direction, and speed. So information about a single specific state of an angel will always be incomplete in this way.
I propose that the universe works in the following manner:
1. There is a set of actors and events that we do not experience or observe.
2. The information produced by these actors and events is our reality, a subset of the universe which I call nature.
The information I speak of is not the angels and baseballs, but rather a set of information arising from the network of angels and baseballs. Everything that is real to us exists in this information; this information is what our environment and ourselves are composed of. The complexity observed in our reality, in this information called nature, is the result of yet another unseen complexity in the universe.
It should be noted that this interpretation of observed phenomena in the universe can be considered fairly consistent with what is known as the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics with some interesting differences. In the Copenhagen view reality is created by observation. In the view that I have just proposed the observations of the large configuration creates our reality as well.
What then, is different? How matter, space, and time exist is completely redefined in this framework. And I mean *completely*
They actually work their way in twice. One version of matter, space, and time for nature, and one version for the underlying realm of the unseen actors and events.
If you are interested in understanding these ideas... good luck. They're rather difficult based on the departures from established thinking.
Start with this casual introduction, it will link you to a more technical explanation:
www.techmocracy.net/science/zeno.htm
mhelland@techmocracy.net
We start with an angel named Steve.
Being that Steve is an angel we know that he is not made of the matter we observe. Also, he does not exist in the time or space we observe. This is cool because that means Steve does not abide to the laws of physics we know of and we are free to invent new laws of physics for him. Here:
1. An angel may still move by inertia
2. Angels cannot see other angels
3. There are baseballs flying around this angel-world which an angel can catch if they cross paths
4. When an angel catches a baseball his speed and direction changes based on the speed and direction of the incoming ball
5. The angel then throws the baseball, without a specific target he just chucks it randomly
Ok, so Steve is chilling, and all of a sudden he catches a baseball. His speed and direction adjusts, and then he throws the ball.
Let's now say this has continued for a while. Steve has been catching, adjusting, and throwing and the results of his adjustments have managed to group together a handful of angels in a collection. Sort of like how gnats seem to keep a swarm together, somehow the specific rules of how an angel reacts and adjusts by catching a baseball have managed to swarm together some angels. These angels still don't see each other or interact with each other through any mechanism except for the baseballs being tossed around.
During all of this the angels are pretty manageable. The direction the balls are coming from vary, naturally, as the positions of the angels in the group are always changing, but they are still somewhat predictable.
All of a sudden a baseball comes from somewhere totally unexpected. This confuses Steve. There must be something out there besides his known group in the local vicinity.
Through only ball speak Steve manages something pretty incredible. He and his buddies arrange themselves into a sophisticated configuration. This configuration enables them to coordinate the throws of their baseballs in some general direction. They are able to catch external baseballs from some general direction and through a sophisticated network of internal throws they are able gather and store information about these external catches. They are even able to compute based on this information.
What type of computations are performed? Say they throw a large number of baseballs in a general direction, and a number of baseballs comes back from that direction. The computer realizes there is another group of angels out there refracting back a fraction of the balls thrown at it. The computer can take the data of successive throws and catches to estimate the size and shape of the other group, triangulate its distances, and approximate the speed and direction of the group at large.
This is a good deal of information that arises from the network of angels. However, despite how much interesting information can be gathered this way, there are still limits to how specific the information can be. For example, if it takes multiple throws to determine the position, direction, and speed of a specific angel, after every throw the angel will have changed its position, direction, and speed. So information about a single specific state of an angel will always be incomplete in this way.
I propose that the universe works in the following manner:
1. There is a set of actors and events that we do not experience or observe.
2. The information produced by these actors and events is our reality, a subset of the universe which I call nature.
The information I speak of is not the angels and baseballs, but rather a set of information arising from the network of angels and baseballs. Everything that is real to us exists in this information; this information is what our environment and ourselves are composed of. The complexity observed in our reality, in this information called nature, is the result of yet another unseen complexity in the universe.
It should be noted that this interpretation of observed phenomena in the universe can be considered fairly consistent with what is known as the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics with some interesting differences. In the Copenhagen view reality is created by observation. In the view that I have just proposed the observations of the large configuration creates our reality as well.
What then, is different? How matter, space, and time exist is completely redefined in this framework. And I mean *completely*
They actually work their way in twice. One version of matter, space, and time for nature, and one version for the underlying realm of the unseen actors and events.
If you are interested in understanding these ideas... good luck. They're rather difficult based on the departures from established thinking.
Start with this casual introduction, it will link you to a more technical explanation:
www.techmocracy.net/science/zeno.htm
mhelland@techmocracy.net
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.274 seconds