<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Tommy</i>
<br />Dale wrote
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">In this alternative theory its the quantum vacuum or zero point energy puts matter in its place so that space can exist.In other words if you could deplete and or shield all of the zero point energy away from a particle then that particle would swell up and also display a faster time.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Interesting thought. But is there such a thing as time? If we were to take a snapshot of a now moment, would we be able to isolate time? Isn't time merely a measurement of a this time to that time, a distance betwee two now moments? After all, it is common knowledge that when we act in the now, wnen we are lost in the now, we lose a sense of time, so maybe there s no such thing as time? That time is a conceptual construct existing only in our theories?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If it can be understood its science.
I have a saying.
Any illusion done well enough becomes reality.
For the other posters asking about black holes giving off energy its interesting to examine how this alternative theory predicts white holes. Note that even white holes can appear dark in this theory if nothing from the reverse side falls into them.
It gives some predictions on what would be observed if you approached
a regular run of the mill black hole.
The 3m level where light is in principle bent enough that it can make
a complete orbit, is also predicted in this theory to actually be a
flat surface.
Tried to model how a hypothetical space ship could
measure the curving light beam as it traveled around the black hole
and through the space ship,could he observe the curving of the light
beam and if not why. A possible answer is that anything our astronaut
could use would become distorted, actually strength objects would
become curved to match the light path.Turning the ruler over would
only reverse the curving if this were so. But even this would require
matter
contraction on the lower side of the ruler.
If true and our astronaut rulers continue to distort as he goes deeper
and remember to him they are actually still straight, the continuing
curving of his tools "to him are straight" will eventually make the
hypothetical event horizon appear to
reverse becoming a white hole that to him now curves inwards.Note that
this event horizon now contains a universe larger than the total white
hole surface area is now able too contain.
Remember how some of our present day predictions for how the most
distant
possible views from a super hypothetical telescope would see our most
early
universe. It would be small patches located at different points also
oddly matching this prediction.
These predicted white holes would have repulsive gravity but in
reality its a bit like saying
the sky has repulsive gravity.They would be very odd in that while
they will
appear in different locations in our universe if you got up close
to one it would reveal itself to actually only be the one object.
A really really interesting prediction is that the surfaces would work
just like those predictions given for wormholes.Shortcuts to other
locations in our
universe.Its also a possible thought that we should get the equivalent
of cosmic rays from white holes
as Doppler shifted light or other radiation that randomly falls from
the previous universe into our universe from white holes.
Sorry about this part being even more speculative but
This theory also predicts white holes and while finding them might be
a bit hard in principle finding none will disprove the theory
Dale
Knowledge of a question is Knowledge.Knowledge of an original question is original Knowledge.
