Does it matter where the money comes from?

More
14 years 1 week ago #21057 by Larry Burford
<b>[Stoat] " ... the thread has already gone off track ... "</b>

Thank you Stoat. At least one of you was paying attention. Now, I realize it will be hard to stay away from a lot of the political events that are happening. They are interesting, and a case can usually be made that such events have, or can have, an impact on the scientific world. But my initial take on this is that that isn't good enough.

In general, I want us to stick to discussion of things with a direct impact.

So lets give this rule a try, and see if it works: "If you want to talk about &lt;some particular event or group&gt;, and you think it ties into the theme of Big Science and its relationship to Big Government, then show us that tie explicitly. Say it in words."

Most of the time, I expect that this would require several paragraphs to demonstrate the tie in for an event that can be described in one or two sentences. I will be very surprised if you can make a satisfactory post that does not have close to half of the words devoted to explicitly describing the tie in. But we shall see.

And as interesting as some of this Big Government stuff is, I believe the tie-ins to Big Science will be more interesting.

Here is a suggestion
<ul><li>compose your post in Notepad.</li>
<li>Save it</li>
<li>Read it a few hours later, and make the changes you now see it needs.</li>
<li>Repeat this process, until it stops needing chages.</li>
<li>Copy and paste it into the message window here.</li>
<li>Preview it and make changes as needed.</li>
<li>Post it.</li></ul>
IOW, do not shoot from the hip. THINK about what you are saying. Ask yourself if it really is on topic.

Then post.

===

Take the global warming/polar bear habitat stuff mentioned above. We have all heard that it is imperative that we (mankind) start spending all the money that the Rich Among Us have ever hoarded, in order to avoid the loss of that last little ice cube where the VERY Last Polar Bear In Existence is clinging to life. We have also all heard that the polar bear polulation is larger today than it ever has been, and that the ice caps are not shrinking.

Let's find the science behind both claims. And let's find where the money comes from to do the science behind each claim. You may have noticed that discussions about global warming never go anywhere in the popular press. I'd like to think that we are better than that, and that we can actually figure out how to know at least a portion of the truth.

I'm an optimist, in case you have not noticed. But that doesn't mean I'm right. If we can't do this, and avoid all the shouting matches that usually go along with the discussion of the things that are on tipic here, then I'll just pull the plug.

(And apolgize to Tom.)

Good luck to us,
LB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 years 1 week ago #24050 by Larry Burford
<b>[headrobot] "Wall street came up with this idea of carbon credits"</b>

Did they? A cursory search on the net for "carbon credit inventor" is not very informative. There seem to be some sources that belive Al Gore is the inventor. But I suspect that this is about as credible as the claim that he invented the internet. Of course, even if he did not invent carbon credits, he has made hundreds of millions of dollars off of the idea.

(Homework assignment - "Or did he?")

And, by the way, to say that someome "came up with an idea" is not really the same as saying that someone "invented it". (Or is it? Is something like carbon credits going to be invented? Or is it going to be thought up? What do these things mean? )

===

I want this forum (forum name = "Big Science and Big Government", with the first and so far only topic named "Does it really matter where the money comes from?") to be a more scientific discussion of issues like this. You can go almost anywhere on the net and find a non-science (non-sense?) discussion of these things. If that is what you really want, then go there.

If this forum is going to work (be productive, or useful, in some scientific way) we are going to have to do more than just "pop off" with unsupported claims.

Try to work with me on this, please. I do not mean for this to be easy. I want it to, ultimatey, at some time in the future, actually find some d*mn answers. We can do this. We have some talent here. Talent that is used to thinking, to some extent, out of the box. That is, in fact, a rare resource.

Write. Stop. Think. Stop. Rewrite. Stop. Think. Post.

Regards,
LB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 years 1 week ago #21058 by Larry Burford
And, the best posts are going to those that manage to make an explicit tie-in not just to science, but to astronomy and/or cosmology. Because they are the primary focus areas of this website.

I plan to be a little more flexible here (in this forum) than elsewhere on the message board. But like any god, I can become p*ss*d *ff, and start hitting the "smite" button on my keyboard. It is unlikely, for I am a mello god. But hey, stuff happens.

Stay tuned.

LB


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 years 1 week ago #21059 by headrobot
Replied by headrobot on topic Reply from HYRUM JONES
1. I apologize for the diversion from the topic.

2. Does it matter where the money comes from? Well, a small part of that money used to be or would have been mine, but it is taken and placed against my will, so that matters to me. I would choose to fund different science projects.

3. Like Larry, I want to find some answers. I came to meta research to help me in my search.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.348 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum