- Thank you received: 0
Theory of Replication
15 years 10 months ago #20290
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
MARX, If protons are made in nature at some environmental parameters it is clear no lasers and whatever are in use. I wonder how you would invent fire if it was not an everyday common thing? The way a proton is made needs to be determined and the first step in doing that is understanding protons are made in some natural process that is not yet known. Even the BB model says protons are made in a right kind of enviroment that does not now exist but did exist at some time way back. Why not look at that environment and do the math from that point. And if the CERN guys can reproduce that environment then why not make the proton there?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #23390
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Jim
My model I showed you is based on how I think they were made during the big bang...
The environment is that of a plasma of electrons and positrons
and gravity waves from a higher dimension condensed that plasma energy into matter....
I think that using a lot of electromagnetic resonance waves calculated to the 3d shape of electrons and positrons in a proton would help so that the waves help to stabilize the system at some point then use the lasers to speed up there spins while making the electromagnetic resonance waves((that create spaces based on the canceled waves that the electrons and positrons can be held in)) smaller
until the whole system gets to the mass of a proton...
I think with that idea it might be possible to send one electron and positron in to the electromagnetic framework at a time.
I have been looking at "Bose-Einstein statistics" and have found that in an ideal Bose gas, some of the particles would condense in a zero state where they do not contribute to the density, volume ...
as would need to happen with this model for replicating protons.
(Based on the McGRAW-HILL concise Encyclopedia of PHYSICS
page 75 by Max Dresden -died in 1997)
MARX
My model I showed you is based on how I think they were made during the big bang...
The environment is that of a plasma of electrons and positrons
and gravity waves from a higher dimension condensed that plasma energy into matter....
I think that using a lot of electromagnetic resonance waves calculated to the 3d shape of electrons and positrons in a proton would help so that the waves help to stabilize the system at some point then use the lasers to speed up there spins while making the electromagnetic resonance waves((that create spaces based on the canceled waves that the electrons and positrons can be held in)) smaller
until the whole system gets to the mass of a proton...
I think with that idea it might be possible to send one electron and positron in to the electromagnetic framework at a time.
I have been looking at "Bose-Einstein statistics" and have found that in an ideal Bose gas, some of the particles would condense in a zero state where they do not contribute to the density, volume ...
as would need to happen with this model for replicating protons.
(Based on the McGRAW-HILL concise Encyclopedia of PHYSICS
page 75 by Max Dresden -died in 1997)
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #15664
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
hey Stoat
That is one of the reasons I started looking in to how to describe the proton structure, to crack water into
hydrogen using less energy... and that's the good thing about this theory is that if it is able to describe a different point of view of the same thing (Quantum Mechanics)in a more in depth way then we would be able to simulate a better result
for almost every thing in chemistry!
It is my hope to be able to use a laser to make hydrogen from water on the go...using stainless steal is dirty
and the device would have to be cleaned a lot..
that would make sea water the new gas and we really have a limitless supply, where truckers can just go up to the ocean and fill up there trucks, to send to people for fuel.. Imagine 40 cents a gallon, or free if you go to the ocean your self!
MARX
That is one of the reasons I started looking in to how to describe the proton structure, to crack water into
hydrogen using less energy... and that's the good thing about this theory is that if it is able to describe a different point of view of the same thing (Quantum Mechanics)in a more in depth way then we would be able to simulate a better result
for almost every thing in chemistry!
It is my hope to be able to use a laser to make hydrogen from water on the go...using stainless steal is dirty
and the device would have to be cleaned a lot..
that would make sea water the new gas and we really have a limitless supply, where truckers can just go up to the ocean and fill up there trucks, to send to people for fuel.. Imagine 40 cents a gallon, or free if you go to the ocean your self!
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #15665
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Hi John
I thought anything over the speed of light is suppose to be instantaneous?...
didn't they measure gravity to be the speed of light?...
so your telling me that the graviton is a part of the mechanism that operates behind the electric and magnetic field lines??
In September 2002, Sergei Kopeikin and Edward Fomalont announced that they had made an indirect measurement of the speed of gravity, using their data from VLBI measurement of the retarded position of Jupiter on its orbit during Jupiter's transit across the line-of-sight of the bright radio source quasar QSO J0842+1835. Kopeikin and Fomalont concluded that the speed of gravity is between 0.8 and 1.2 times the speed of light, which would be fully consistent with the theoretical prediction of general relativity that the speed of gravity is exactly the same as the speed of light.
Are you saying that matter in this dimension is held together to some great extent by gravity and anti-gravity flowing in and out of dimensions instantly (faster then the speed of light)
or is that the wrong idea, and relativity is wrong?
somthing is faster then light, and not instantaneous.?
MARX
I thought anything over the speed of light is suppose to be instantaneous?...
didn't they measure gravity to be the speed of light?...
so your telling me that the graviton is a part of the mechanism that operates behind the electric and magnetic field lines??
In September 2002, Sergei Kopeikin and Edward Fomalont announced that they had made an indirect measurement of the speed of gravity, using their data from VLBI measurement of the retarded position of Jupiter on its orbit during Jupiter's transit across the line-of-sight of the bright radio source quasar QSO J0842+1835. Kopeikin and Fomalont concluded that the speed of gravity is between 0.8 and 1.2 times the speed of light, which would be fully consistent with the theoretical prediction of general relativity that the speed of gravity is exactly the same as the speed of light.
Are you saying that matter in this dimension is held together to some great extent by gravity and anti-gravity flowing in and out of dimensions instantly (faster then the speed of light)
or is that the wrong idea, and relativity is wrong?
somthing is faster then light, and not instantaneous.?
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #20291
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Marx, YES that is exactly what I am stating, a large scale graviton cycle and graviton capture mechanism not only creates mass but is the key to understanding all motion in the Universe. The ESA found through experiment that the gravitomagnetic force is a trillion times stronger than Einstein predicted and high spin rates create an antigravity effect. Gravity is an instantaneous force because literally the graviton motion operates way above the speed of light, you cannot calculate 100,000 light year orbits using the speed of light it will not work. Kiplerian equations for orbits do not use a light speed time delay, otherwise the calculations for orbits will be wrong. Zero ligt speed time delays in orbits so Newton was correct regarding gravity being an instantaneous force. Black holes are the return mechanism terminating forward time which is where antimatter induction takes place creating a reverse motion solid antimatter core and FTL antigravitons. Two polar rings exist around the reverse motion antimatter core where electron positron polar ring annihilation zone generating a tube of gamma rays around a solid 17,500 trillion mile long jets of pure antimatter. These relativity jets operate at light speed and do not represent the true hour glass antigraviton radiations that leave our galaxy at HFTL speeds [HFTL-higher frequencies than light]. Black holes are the key to understanding how galaxies form, and Halton Arp is exactly correct that quasar ejections from antimatter cores create new galaxies---the missing key is that it takes antimatter ejections to create the seed for galaxy formation. There is an inextricable relationship between matter and antimatter. It is the antigravitons that leave our galaxy at HFTL speeds that pushes away clouds of antimatter towards the magnetic boundary. It is also the antigravitons that pushes away any other galaxy as long as both ecliptics are parallel, if they are not then a collision can and does take place while the graviton flow moves strictly along the ecliptic and will suck in mass but for the most part 'hot creational zones' form in arms of galaxies do to graviton capture reaching a critical point of density creating light speed mass. The galactic wind from mass formation processes forming gases pushes againt the graviton stream causing solar systems to trail behind the faster moving eyewall. That is why galaxies have usually at least two trailing arms of circulating mass---solar systems, because the core light speed mass is moving at 4.4 million miles per hour while the galaxy is moving through space a 1.4 million miles per hour. The existing models do not include an energy dynamic nor do we currently understand the functions of black holes. Naive quantum physics and cosmological models show zero cause for motion other then action at a distance from curved space time around mass to dark matter and dark energy which supposedly makes up 96% of the missing mass---it is a big JOKE! We are so totally confussed that it is no wonder we are still using carbon based fuels to drive vehicles and rocket technology to get into space.
The Universe has always existed, Universe is a perpetual motion machine, singularities do not exist in an already infinite Universe, space is not a substance and can not be cramed into a singularity so the BIG BANG never happened, and everything is in dual motion between a forward and reverse time mirror Universe.
General Relativity [GR] and Special Relativity [SR] are wrong. No space time curvature around mass but some of the relativistic equations do work but not for the reasons explained. SR is false, there are no speed limits and we certainly can build faster than light space ships. Since magnetic fields are captured gravitons, we can manipulate the graviton HFTL capture process to generate free electrons and antigravity effects, create shielding around ship so that you do not feel any movement---no G forces and also build antimatter induction similar to black holes to create a hyper drive system that shoots antigravitons ahead of the ship creating a 4th dimensional worm hole that is chased by gravitons pushing the ship upwards to 20 billion times the speed of light.
Protons-I have not had the time to look at magnetic fields around protons but most likely there is only a meson and a dipolar gluon stream chasing a quark and antiquark around a torus and central magnetic field. More than one meson would mean that quark pairs would still track in their own torus, but now they would also track around the proton in a combined torus with an incoming top and outgoing bottom plasmoid gluon distribution system tied to the graviton cycle. So, why do we see so many variations during collider experiments? The motion is so extreme as identified by FERMI labs that measured what they call flipping states between quark and antiquarks upwards to 3 trillion times per second, that a colliding proton when the field is burst open creates all sorts of deformed quark and antiquarks so that we really will never get a true picture of what is going on. The artifact in the experiment is the mental imaging and a prioi thinking that has all this baggage from past theory.
So, unless you look at how energy is being transferred through the system you will not get a true picture of Universe. John
The Universe has always existed, Universe is a perpetual motion machine, singularities do not exist in an already infinite Universe, space is not a substance and can not be cramed into a singularity so the BIG BANG never happened, and everything is in dual motion between a forward and reverse time mirror Universe.
General Relativity [GR] and Special Relativity [SR] are wrong. No space time curvature around mass but some of the relativistic equations do work but not for the reasons explained. SR is false, there are no speed limits and we certainly can build faster than light space ships. Since magnetic fields are captured gravitons, we can manipulate the graviton HFTL capture process to generate free electrons and antigravity effects, create shielding around ship so that you do not feel any movement---no G forces and also build antimatter induction similar to black holes to create a hyper drive system that shoots antigravitons ahead of the ship creating a 4th dimensional worm hole that is chased by gravitons pushing the ship upwards to 20 billion times the speed of light.
Protons-I have not had the time to look at magnetic fields around protons but most likely there is only a meson and a dipolar gluon stream chasing a quark and antiquark around a torus and central magnetic field. More than one meson would mean that quark pairs would still track in their own torus, but now they would also track around the proton in a combined torus with an incoming top and outgoing bottom plasmoid gluon distribution system tied to the graviton cycle. So, why do we see so many variations during collider experiments? The motion is so extreme as identified by FERMI labs that measured what they call flipping states between quark and antiquarks upwards to 3 trillion times per second, that a colliding proton when the field is burst open creates all sorts of deformed quark and antiquarks so that we really will never get a true picture of what is going on. The artifact in the experiment is the mental imaging and a prioi thinking that has all this baggage from past theory.
So, unless you look at how energy is being transferred through the system you will not get a true picture of Universe. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #23496
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Marx, we should talk later via email about free energy. I am building a video production studio and lab for developing technology. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.309 seconds