Time Travel

Personally I don't think i fully buy these theories, but what do you guys think on the theories of the wormhole, or the rotating black hole style theories?

Marks of wisdom can come from even the most unlikely sources.

Origin,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>Personally I don't think i fully buy these theories, but what do you guys think on the theories of the wormhole, or the rotating black hole style theories?</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I suspect that something extremely massive that would be considered a Black Hole probably exists but that the physics about it are totally out of wack. The extrapolations of Relativity to the extremes is simply not physical reality. There are likely several factors that cause a breakdown of the mathematics and singulatities, worm holes, etc are not realistic.



"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

yea, that's what i thought too. Although I believe that black holes actually exist, the theory behind it was, which this is the part i don't really buy, that normal holes are not rotating. If somehow, a rotating black holes (called a kerr hole) could somehow form, then the rotation wouldn't allow a singularity to be formed, and thus it might be possible to travel through. This is also the theory with the parallel universes and such where you might end up getting spewed out a white hole (which i don't personally think really exists, but hey, i'll keep an open mind) then you might have landed yourself in a parallel universe where ALMOST everything mirrors your normal universe, but in a parallel universe, you might stop reading altogether and do something else, whereas in this universe you continue to read until you finish. The theory is that there are an infinite amount of parallel universes, and you may never find your way to your normal universe if you did somehow end up in a parallel universe. With all that in mind, i don't think i really buy it, but like I said, I don't think it hurts to keep an open mind.

Marks of wisdom can come from even the most unlikely sources.

I think the safest bet on the universe is to assume anything is
possible, it being so infinite and all. But presently, the most
useful physics have been done under an assumption of
a universe following a basic cause and effect principle.

The trick is allowing your mind to be open to new ideas, but not so much as to allow your brain to fall out.

123.., I suggest wearing a hat.

Origin, check the floor, I believe you dropped something.


JR

Here is what all of rigorous Science uses as a definition of time:

We shall "assume without examination", the unidirectional, one-valued, one-dimensional character of the time continuum.
www.reciprocalsystem.com/ce/timenat.htm
Reciprocal Systems

Personally, the more I examined this concept of time, the more I realized that neither the concept of space nor time existed at all. Universe seems to renew itself so rapidly, that it has no time unit for all intents and purposes. What we call time should be called "laggin past". Traveling from our lagging past (cause then effect) to the Present Presence (cause = effect) is the function of sleep, and we do this every night to renew our being.

Time is gravity. John Worrell Keely

Meta