<i>Originally posted by n/a</i>
<br />yea, that's what i thought too. Although I believe that black holes actually exist, the theory behind it was, which this is the part i don't really buy, that normal holes are not rotating. If somehow, a rotating black holes (called a kerr hole) could somehow form, then the rotation wouldn't allow a singularity to be formed, and thus it might be possible to travel through. This is also the theory with the parallel universes and such where you might end up getting spewed out a white hole (which i don't personally think really exists, but hey, i'll keep an open mind) then you might have landed yourself in a parallel universe where ALMOST everything mirrors your normal universe, but in a parallel universe, you might stop reading altogether and do something else, whereas in this universe you continue to read until you finish. The theory is that there are an infinite amount of parallel universes, and you may never find your way to your normal universe if you did somehow end up in a parallel universe. With all that in mind, i don't think i really buy it, but like I said, I don't think it hurts to keep an open mind.
n/a
i don't think that black holes exist,why because they are based on rotation,vortex and rotation are NOT the same thing.vortex is either at the TOP or BOTTOM of a mass,have you ever seen a picture of a galaxy with a vortex either on TOP or BOTTOM of it.vortex is never begun in the center of any mass,rotation however IS at the center of a mass but NOT at the TOP or BOTTOM,true?!!a galaxy always looks like a suspended egg,half above center,half below.i have never seen a vortex start,or suspend itself at the center of any mass.
