- Thank you received: 0
T or E
18 years 4 months ago #8886
by Gregg
Did ice ever go that far south in an earlier ice age? One of the things any visitor to Yosemite is familiar with, is what they call "glacial erratics", or large boulders that have been dropped far from their origin, by the ice flow.
Here's an example from Cairgorms, UK.
www.fettes.com/Cairngorms/glacial%20erratics.htm
rd
[/quote]
You have a fair and rational question. As far as I know the last ice age reached as far south as the middle of Washington State. Having existed in Bakersfield (not lived), I cannot imagine ice in that area. But that is a personal bias.
By the way Larry Burford, I have attempted to violate TANSTAAFL many times. Never succeeded.
Gregg Wilson
Replied by Gregg on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson
Did ice ever go that far south in an earlier ice age? One of the things any visitor to Yosemite is familiar with, is what they call "glacial erratics", or large boulders that have been dropped far from their origin, by the ice flow.
Here's an example from Cairgorms, UK.
www.fettes.com/Cairngorms/glacial%20erratics.htm
rd
[/quote]
You have a fair and rational question. As far as I know the last ice age reached as far south as the middle of Washington State. Having existed in Bakersfield (not lived), I cannot imagine ice in that area. But that is a personal bias.
By the way Larry Burford, I have attempted to violate TANSTAAFL many times. Never succeeded.
Gregg Wilson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #16013
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Gregg</i>
<br /> Having existed in Bakersfield (not lived), I cannot imagine ice in that area. But that is a personal bias.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I know the last ice age didn't, I saw a picture of a simulation. But there have been more extensive ice ages prior to that.
rd
<br /> Having existed in Bakersfield (not lived), I cannot imagine ice in that area. But that is a personal bias.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I know the last ice age didn't, I saw a picture of a simulation. But there have been more extensive ice ages prior to that.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #8887
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
As a change of pace while I gear up for my next round of face postings, I find it interesting that the much vaunted Yucatan Crater that supposedly extincted the dinosaurs on Earth is not much bigger than the run of the mill (size wise) crater on Mars, and there are hundreds--or thousands of them (I haven't counted them).
Here's the well known Gusev Crater in a Mola section map. It's around 150 km dia. to the Yucantan's 200. Also interesting about the Gusev is that you can see obvious evidence of water. The channel is either flowing into or out of the crater, either as a result of the water dump proposed in the EPH, or an outflow as the impact was made in or near a once existing body of water.
Neil
Here's the well known Gusev Crater in a Mola section map. It's around 150 km dia. to the Yucantan's 200. Also interesting about the Gusev is that you can see obvious evidence of water. The channel is either flowing into or out of the crater, either as a result of the water dump proposed in the EPH, or an outflow as the impact was made in or near a once existing body of water.
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #8888
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
[neilderosa] "The channel is either flowing into or out of the crater ... "
My first impression is that water flowed into the crater via this channel. The land to the south is higher, and it looks like the crater wall on the north west side was washed away. There is no clear channeling to the north west, but large parts of that area might already have been underwater at the time.
There are some shorter flow channels (south west of the crater) that also lead from the higher yellow areas to the lower green areas.
???,
LB
My first impression is that water flowed into the crater via this channel. The land to the south is higher, and it looks like the crater wall on the north west side was washed away. There is no clear channeling to the north west, but large parts of that area might already have been underwater at the time.
There are some shorter flow channels (south west of the crater) that also lead from the higher yellow areas to the lower green areas.
???,
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #16078
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">My first impression is that water flowed into the crater via this channel. The land to the south is higher, and it looks like the crater wall on the north west side was washed away. There is no clear channeling to the north west, but large parts of that area might already have been underwater at the time. LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Agreed.
Viewers also note that I just added some info to M2100050 "Ugly Woman" post above.
Neil
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Agreed.
Viewers also note that I just added some info to M2100050 "Ugly Woman" post above.
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #15909
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">This is one that compares with the Cydonia Face in size. Image width (of strip) is 2.93 km. That makes the face with hair about 1 km wide. Pixel width is 2.87, which is decent resolution for the MOC. The JPL censors must have missed this 2001 image because what's right next to it is blocked out. It is in the West Candor Chasma, just north of the Valles Marineris, aprox. 74W, 5S. Neil (from "Ugly Woman" post above)
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Do I have any evidence to support that outrageous statement? I submit two pieces of evidence: 1-There are no 1998 images with blocked out sections, (to my knowledge they don't use film in the traditional sense, so why would they need to block out sections as if running out of film?) 2-I hates coincidences. That looks an awfull like her kid she's holding up for us to see ,under that blocked out section. (Correction, the W Candor Chasma is part of the Valles Marineris system.)
Neil
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Do I have any evidence to support that outrageous statement? I submit two pieces of evidence: 1-There are no 1998 images with blocked out sections, (to my knowledge they don't use film in the traditional sense, so why would they need to block out sections as if running out of film?) 2-I hates coincidences. That looks an awfull like her kid she's holding up for us to see ,under that blocked out section. (Correction, the W Candor Chasma is part of the Valles Marineris system.)
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.409 seconds