My pareidolia knows no bounds.

[Larry Burford]"Paraphrasing myself - "Even BS theories can offer some insight into the nature of nature."
Another agreement.

Some of my favorite B.S. theories that can offer "some insight into the nature of nature" are that matter exists. That "solid" objects exist. That might is right. That life and death exist. That time and space exist.

Exactly. I find it so interesting that the ideas we accept and the ideas we reject say at least as much about us (both as individuals and as a group) as about the ideas themselves.

Not long ago the advent of things like BB and QM and SRT led many to the idea of "the end of science". There were just a few small holes left to be filled in, after which all the scientists could retire. A bit premature IMO because despite all that we do know there is still much to be learned. For example, think about how little we actually know about Mars. Or about Luna. Or even about the floor of the Indian Ocean where that airliner might be resting right now. (We don't even know THAT for sure.)

And there are most likely some things to be unlearned.

Natural philosophy is still an infant.

DRP offers the promise of advancing knowledge a bit, and/or correcting a few misunderstandings, but even if it does we still will not have it 'right'. There is a long long way to go.

We need something unified. Philosophy is dual. If we don't all agree we will have friction and as we all know there is only friction on the Newtonian level. There is no friction in quantum reality which i propose we accept or we will have war and friction. Reality is that each thing is in the universe and the universe is in it- they co-create each other are infinite and beyond time and space- everlasting like light or our spirit. Our spirit is electromagnetic energy appearing to move thru an electromagnetic field. If we continue to look at things mechanically we will never perceive with our senses let alone transcend power/ art/ sociability / philosophy/ reality. Right now the world is still in the might is right belief mode. In reality (quantum) might and right are ideas of Newtonian man.
i realize that at the present time no major agreement exist as to the mode of acceptance of which interpretation of the dead cat B.S. is most matching to reality (quantum). This is looking at quantum with Newtonian eyes. Quantum jumps around depending to the perceiver etc. It is not categorical to the same degree as Newtonian physics.

Sounds like fun. Let us know how it turns out.

Larry Burford- Found a website that i intuit points to a lot of reality (quantum). Seems post Bohr- post dead double talking cats. www.commonsensescience.org/quantum_reality.html

<b>[pareidoliac] "Larry Burford- Found a website that i intuit points to a lot of reality (quantum). Seems post Bohr- post dead double talking cats. www.commonsensescience.org/quantum_reality.html "

This is indeed an interesting website. I've known about it for a while.

Since you seem to be a Believer (in Quantum BS) I'm curious why you have pointed to it.