My pareidolia knows no bounds.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />2. If the image looks like a girl and cannot be explained as a result of natural processes then it is, or has, a "Possible Artificial Design"

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

It also has a "Possible Pareidolic Design."

Are we getting there?

Use the word "Possible" for both cases, not just one.

rd

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br /> IT WOULD BE LIKE SAYING..."LOOK, THERE'S SOME SADNESS ON MARS" OR LOOK, THERE'S "ANGER ON MARS"

Are we getting there?

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It would also be like saying: "LOOK, THERE'S ART ON MAR'S."

Are we getting there, yet?

rd

Orion. Man in the Moon. Horse head nebula. NOT PAREIDOLIA

We also see patterns in clouds and on toast. YES, PAREIDOLIA - THE TARGET DATA CAN BE CONFIRMED

And we see patterns in the rocks on Mars. NOT PAREIDOLIA

***

You say pareidolia is the wrong word to use. OK, fine. Stop whining and fix it.

Oh Larry, you look so attractive when you get testy....!

???

[/quote]

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br /> IT WOULD BE LIKE SAYING..."LOOK, THERE'S SOME SADNESS ON MARS" OR LOOK, THERE'S "ANGER ON MARS"

Are we getting there?

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It would also be like saying: "LOOK, THERE'S ART ON MAR'S."

Are we getting there, yet?

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Correct, if the images cannot be explained by probable natural processes and the target data point has intent in the design, yes, it could be art most certainly and there is ample evidence to suggest this IS the case.

Malcolm Scott

Larry...which bar? I need a bourbon on the rock..gee and it's only 10 am!

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<b> the target data point has intent </b> in the design

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Totally subjective, just like pareidolia.

You have just made my argument for me.

rd