- Thank you received: 0
Wils' Tetrahedron
10 years 7 months ago #22403
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Malcolm, you didn't address my concerns in my previous message.
rd
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 7 months ago #22241
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />Malcolm, you didn't address my concerns in my previous message.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Oh sorry, I'll check and get back with you...need to run be back later
Malcolm Scott
<br />Malcolm, you didn't address my concerns in my previous message.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Oh sorry, I'll check and get back with you...need to run be back later
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 7 months ago #22242
by Marsevidence01
As I said, my image comes directly as is, from the JP2 Anaglyph downloaded from hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_002841_1740
I was trying to match up with precise lines, your image to mine, but was unable to. You drew a big circle on the grayscale image, but that doesn't help lining them up.
rd
[/quote]
Rich, I'm not sure specifically what you are trying to "line up" here. The images I posted have quite extreme magnification so give me a little more info here and will be glad to help.
I too downloaded the file(s) from HiRISE but these are the two stereo files and not their anaglyph JP2. Yes, their anaglyph does show the terrain in the same topography but my point was, when I see this, their anaglyph topography does not make any sense in respect to the sheer "thickness" of the "<i>arte</i> like" mountain ridges. <i>Arte</i> mountain ridges, on Earth are formed typically by glacier movements and can't see that happening here. Even on Earth, these type of ridges get no where close to being that thin. This is very strange.
Malcolm Scott
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
As I said, my image comes directly as is, from the JP2 Anaglyph downloaded from hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_002841_1740
I was trying to match up with precise lines, your image to mine, but was unable to. You drew a big circle on the grayscale image, but that doesn't help lining them up.
rd
[/quote]
Rich, I'm not sure specifically what you are trying to "line up" here. The images I posted have quite extreme magnification so give me a little more info here and will be glad to help.
I too downloaded the file(s) from HiRISE but these are the two stereo files and not their anaglyph JP2. Yes, their anaglyph does show the terrain in the same topography but my point was, when I see this, their anaglyph topography does not make any sense in respect to the sheer "thickness" of the "<i>arte</i> like" mountain ridges. <i>Arte</i> mountain ridges, on Earth are formed typically by glacier movements and can't see that happening here. Even on Earth, these type of ridges get no where close to being that thin. This is very strange.
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 7 months ago #22335
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
The Chevron, from the full high-res JP2 Grayscale:
Note the gouge at the top of the left face (red arrow), scraping down into the top and right faces.
rd
[/quote]
Here's a super mag of the very tip (pit) with a 30% reduction in the contrast. Interesting bolder now can now be observed.
[/URL]
Malcolm Scott
Note the gouge at the top of the left face (red arrow), scraping down into the top and right faces.
rd
[/quote]
Here's a super mag of the very tip (pit) with a 30% reduction in the contrast. Interesting bolder now can now be observed.
[/URL]
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 7 months ago #22573
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />Rich, I'm not sure specifically what you are trying to "line up" here. The images I posted have quite extreme magnification so give me a little more info here and will be glad to help.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I was just trying to get oriented, you know, like when you find a street on a map.
But forget that for now. Forget any other images. Just tell me this. You're not trying to tell me <b>THIS</b> is an IMPRESSION, are you? This tetrahedron is a mountain, right?
rd
<br />Rich, I'm not sure specifically what you are trying to "line up" here. The images I posted have quite extreme magnification so give me a little more info here and will be glad to help.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I was just trying to get oriented, you know, like when you find a street on a map.
But forget that for now. Forget any other images. Just tell me this. You're not trying to tell me <b>THIS</b> is an IMPRESSION, are you? This tetrahedron is a mountain, right?
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.328 seconds