Theory of Replication

hmm

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />Have you any idea what kind of environment and drive system would be required to make protons from energy of whatever energy? Although its not yet known to science it clear to me energy transforms into protons. It seems to me science will never make this discovery due to the rules that are in force at this time but that does not mean making protons is prohibited-It just means science is a human tool.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

hey Jim

I was thinking how I would do that in Comsol and I was thinking
about 3 lasers for each electron and positron that would control
there speed and provide radiation pressure, and a electron gun and a positron gun (I dont think the later has been invented yet)... so that would be
about 6561 lasers pointed at 2187 electrons and positrons
flying at each other and then getting the lasers to slow down there velocity and speed up there spin all at the right moments at the right angles and the right trajectory... all at under 1. x10^-15 meters!!!

I really have to get all the mathematics down first tho!

MARX

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by evolivid</i>
<br />

So John do you think that
the Anti quarks might be

121 212 121
212 212 212
121 212 121 = anti down quark = X

212 121 212
121 121 121
212 121 212 = Anti up quark = Z

XZX = anti proton
ZXZ = anti neutron



The reality is experiments show what is really going on and we have to piece the puzzle together
With this theory I think the pieces are all there,...

I wonder about the gluons and the nature of the electric(electron) and (positron)magnetic fields overlapping
as a whole inside the quark creating maybe a gluon effect!
The electric field from the electron is bigger then the magnetic field ,.. and in the positron the magnetic field is bigger then the electric field,...

I like what I see from that HERA experiments site. Because in my mind
I see the system as a whole and the all the electrons and positrons
are propagating through out each other inside the quark and the up quarks and down quarks exchanging electrons and positrons.. that may be or look like anti quarks.. in the whole of the proton

This question here John is really a big one I know, and it has been
something that I have been thinking about that might be needed in the mathematics of the proton system.


I thought that someone had hacked the HERA project and some transformers
where damaged and they would not be able to fix them for a year tho???

MARX
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

MARX

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by evolivid</i>
<br />

<i>Originally posted by evolivid</i>
<br /> The electric field from the electron is bigger then the magnetic field ,.. and in the positron the magnetic field is bigger then the electric field,...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I would say that they are 180 degrees out of phase. Fall into a toroidal electron and you spiral clockwise, let's say, fall into a positron and you spiral anticlockwise. The magnetic field for both is a rough apple shape. Hm... Not quite, the magnetic field through the toroid centre is huge but it falls off according to a cube law. Now I happen to like Kanarev's model of the electron, which has six turns. Six turns which have six nodes that rotate, trying to catch up with pi.

The magnetic field is at right angles to this spiral curve. Obviously angular momentum is varying in proportion to where we are on the spiral curve, in relation to the toroid centre. So the magnetic field is varying also.

However, at the centre of the toroid the magnetic field lines cannot cross. So the magnetic field won't be at ninety degrees to the spiral. That's intersting in itself, is the speed of light fast enough here to avoid work being done? If the two fields get out of synch then a photon has to be emmited or absorbed.

Hi Marx, Yes you got it the big picture is lacking in quantum physics and cosmology for that matter. My gut tells me before I pour into researching magnetic and electric fields, gluons, and meson spin states that in trying to incorporate what I have learned from the big scenario into the proton coupling taking place with electrons that really the magnetic field/electric field represents the graviton flow. Here is why I say that because in forward time negative charge moves towards the positive charge [capacitors discharge causing actual movement towards the positive pole]. If gravitons exist which I believe that they do and that they are the prime mover and cause for mass to exist, then they carry a negative charge just like electrons [gravitons become electrons and fall out of magnetic circulation as virtual electrons creating the electric field]. The 90 degree right thumb rule states that magnetic fields move around the electron torus/current/orbit, and because both electrons and gravitons carry a negative charge that the two repel each other but are attracted to the positive charge and are literally in motion around the proton and maybe through the center of it because it is probably a torus. I think gravitons are very small and operate with in their own spectrum above that of light moving very fast and are an exchange particle similar to electrons and positrons only they are at the top of the hierarchy of all particles. The source is the graviton which are born on the other side of our local large scale motion in reverse time from matter core induction taking place inside antimatter black holes.

Superconductors reveal an antigravity effect because of the 'reverse time wave' is actuated causing zero friction when gravity is neutralized:

"By enveloping fundamental particles, this field would severly distort the rate, and direction at which time flows, as perceived by an external observer. Thus, electric and magnetic fields, from every fundamental particle, would be modulated forwards and backwards in time, but average to the local present. As Richard Feynman observed, a reversal of time equates to a reversal of a particle's charge. The weak binding of cooper-pairs - 10-4-10-3 eV, is therefore proposed to arise from a small phase difference in their relative times. These temporal oscillations are proposed to be the origin of the wave nature of matter. The time-reversed portion of these waves would explain the complex structure of the wavefunction."

starflight1.freeyellow.com/index.html

Gluon strings when they break automatically form a quark and an antiquark at each end because the phased pulse is something like 3 trillion times per second as measured by FERMI labs and the light speed shell is all we see which is the left overs from this extreme interaction that is taking place way above light frequencies. Maybe gluon strings operate similar to a vacuum tube with cathode and anode and taking in graviton [processed by quarks] and emitting antigraviton [processed by antiquarks] causing this extreme flipping rates in mesons. In any case, there is a flow of incoming and outgoing field/particle functions that is controlled by this large scale graviton pool.

Kind of reminds me of a polyphase circuit, that goes both ways, and the gate has to be cleared prior to engagement otherwise overload takes place causing antimatter/matter annihilations. Alternating current must operate this way, and for Universe in general to function a circuit must be completed in La Sage type circuits between our local positive and negative large scale exchange.

Photon's increase electromagnetic strength when passing through gravity fields revealing increased graviton interactions around mass. Gravitons probably cause redshifts more often then not by striping some of the electric field energy reducing the mass of the electron around high energy antimatter core discharges from centers of galaxies. The problem is that we do not recognize how energy cycles in our Universe so we cannot see that mass exists only because of this large scale interexchange. John

Hi John and Mark, I took another look at the problem of the gravitational wavelength. If we have the odd situation in which the gravitational energy of a particle is exactly the same number as the electromagnetic frequency, it would be rather nice if the gravitational wavelength was related to the electromagnetic mass.

That troublesome 2a showed up again, and the result is not quite an electron mass but it's close. The thing is, I don't believe anyone has a good explanation of what the fine structure constant does. Feynman said that physicists go to bed and dream about it.

So, Lambda = h2a / mb = 9.11527784162E-31
b = the speed of gravity
The mass of an electron is 9.1093897E-31 That suggests a mass gain of about h (0.8 something) That might mean that we have to allow for the measurement of the speed of light in our region of space being slightly off, at least I hope thats all it means.

I did find that thread about the infamous spindizzy Dirac Blackett equation of James Blish. Then I remembered why I didn't follow it up. Horrible stuff about something called the g factor in quantum mechanics. Anyway the equation is G = 2 (pc / Bu)^2

p = the magnetic moment 9.2740154882E-24 for an electron, it should be 5.05078646623E-27 for the proton but it's not, it's supposed to be 14.106067E-27 The equation anyway, is mu = e barh / 2m

B = (v cross product E) and u is the angular momentum, which I presume we are taking to be h. I might actually do this once I've given up on this celtic drink fest that my part of Britain subjects itself to at this time of year.

I'll put up two images that are up on the site already but finding anything here is hard work. The first one is the graph of an f.m. cosine particle. If it were animated, wave crests move one way from zero to x equals one, and the other way from one to infinity.

The second image is of the wave pattern of three particles. Admittedly this is of a.m. waves but it does show an equilateral triangle with maybe a virtual particle in its centre. That could be a nodal point for a star delta shadow connection between three quarks. I think that if we allow ourselves neg r.i. then we can explain a force which is in the numerator of an equation.

(Edited) I knew there was something I forgot. Suppose a primitive animalcule has a magnesium atom in its structure. It will have, because theres a lot of it in sea water. Suppose it can use an f.m exponential wave. It will hit a resonant frequency but it will be very inefficient. Still, it does give it some advantages. When it teams up with others, it can make a lattice of magnesium atoms, this allows it to place water into an ice configuration, with the result that we have a catalytic process for cracking water at a very low temperature. Perhaps we could do the same?

In Joe's thread I mentioned that the higgs particle comes out as being close to the mass of an Iron atom. I checked this out and my value comes in at being pretty close to the mass of a Vanadium atom. I don't know much about vanadium, other than its another catalyst, of interest to annelid worms. Em... How would a lump of vanadium, packed with higgs particles vibrate? What's its Fermi velocity?