- Thank you received: 0
Theory of Replication
15 years 10 months ago #15696
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
MARX, Sometimes books are wrong as in this case. Everyone misuses the constant involved here. Its a simple error but still an error and its really an importart detail. JxS is not energy times one second. JxS is energy times time. Time is not one second even if the book says time is one second. Time is maybe less or more than one second and would be one second at one time but not at another time. In the case of the constant involved here its not specified as one second thats for sure, no matter whatever the book says.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #15697
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
so Jim
your saying that the Proton Compton wavelength h/mc = 1.321409855588x10^-15 is not in meters..?
or 2.42631023816x10^-12/2187 = 1.10942*10^-15 is not in meters.?
MARX
your saying that the Proton Compton wavelength h/mc = 1.321409855588x10^-15 is not in meters..?
or 2.42631023816x10^-12/2187 = 1.10942*10^-15 is not in meters.?
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #15699
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stoat</i>
<br />Have a read of this on the toroidal electron. guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/book/06.html
Some people might not have noticed that there is a link to a pdf file on that ESA web page given. It goes into the detail of the article. Top right hand corner of the page.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks Stoat, for this link, just what I was looking for!
MARX
I have been doing some modeling of the torus electron and made this
http://i1.ytimg.com/bg/PHFUHiwbpMqC8ONxEICCiQ/default.jpg?app=bg&i=4576771&time=1230956386928
this is the mathematica 6.3 code for it
ParametricPlot3D[{(1.4 + Cos[ v ]) Cos, (1.4 + Cos[ v ]) Sin,
Sin[ v ]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, {v, 0, 2 Pi}, Axes -> False, Mesh -> None,
Boxed -> False, NormalsFunction -> Function[{x, y, z, u, V,}, RandomReal[{-1, 3}, {3}]]]
<br />Have a read of this on the toroidal electron. guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/book/06.html
Some people might not have noticed that there is a link to a pdf file on that ESA web page given. It goes into the detail of the article. Top right hand corner of the page.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks Stoat, for this link, just what I was looking for!
MARX
I have been doing some modeling of the torus electron and made this
http://i1.ytimg.com/bg/PHFUHiwbpMqC8ONxEICCiQ/default.jpg?app=bg&i=4576771&time=1230956386928
this is the mathematica 6.3 code for it
ParametricPlot3D[{(1.4 + Cos[ v ]) Cos, (1.4 + Cos[ v ]) Sin,
Sin[ v ]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, {v, 0, 2 Pi}, Axes -> False, Mesh -> None,
Boxed -> False, NormalsFunction -> Function[{x, y, z, u, V,}, RandomReal[{-1, 3}, {3}]]]
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #15701
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Hi Jim, h doesn't equal mc^2 you've forgotten the frequency. hf = mc^2
Now f * lambda = c
So f = c / lambda, pop that into the equation in place of f, h * c / lambda = mc^2
Divide out both sides by c, then divide both sides by h to get, 1 / lambda = mc / h
Invert both sides to get lambda = h / mc
All the dimensions are correct, we get the wavelength of the particle, which is its radius, and it's in metres. The electon is a lot bigger than the proton but it has a very low energy density in comparison to the proton or neutron. Quantum mechanics say that the electron is a dimensionless point, that is somewhere in a spherical volume of the compton radius. I happen to think that that's just plain wrong.
Now f * lambda = c
So f = c / lambda, pop that into the equation in place of f, h * c / lambda = mc^2
Divide out both sides by c, then divide both sides by h to get, 1 / lambda = mc / h
Invert both sides to get lambda = h / mc
All the dimensions are correct, we get the wavelength of the particle, which is its radius, and it's in metres. The electon is a lot bigger than the proton but it has a very low energy density in comparison to the proton or neutron. Quantum mechanics say that the electron is a dimensionless point, that is somewhere in a spherical volume of the compton radius. I happen to think that that's just plain wrong.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 10 months ago #15702
by evolivid
Yea Stoat I think that it is wrong as well, Quantum mechanics seems like it has been downgraded almost...
Just had a thought about the electron spins are a (up spin and a down spin) might have reference the way anti-graviton and graviton pressure are entering the vortex of the electron
for instance the up spin might have the gravitons entering the top and anti-gravitons entering the bottom
and a down spin wold be gravitons entering the bottom and anti-gravitons entering the top
Im working out some calculations to see about this graviton and anti-graviton pressure and I think they are both holding together photons in electrons and positrons,... and electrons and positrons in protons and neutrons
Let me know your Ideas on this,... I was also thinking that gravitons could be going outward from the vortex and
anti-gravitons inward... have to do some more math tho..
MARX
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Yea Stoat I think that it is wrong as well, Quantum mechanics seems like it has been downgraded almost...
Just had a thought about the electron spins are a (up spin and a down spin) might have reference the way anti-graviton and graviton pressure are entering the vortex of the electron
for instance the up spin might have the gravitons entering the top and anti-gravitons entering the bottom
and a down spin wold be gravitons entering the bottom and anti-gravitons entering the top
Im working out some calculations to see about this graviton and anti-graviton pressure and I think they are both holding together photons in electrons and positrons,... and electrons and positrons in protons and neutrons
Let me know your Ideas on this,... I was also thinking that gravitons could be going outward from the vortex and
anti-gravitons inward... have to do some more math tho..
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #15706
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Marx, the gravitons are going inwards forming the magnetic field at 90 degree opposition to electron because they both carry a negative charge. So that the electron is virtual and represents the 'light speed center' for the graviton in current ring. How this circulates also through the proton needs to be explored and defined and we could discuss this by our group [Stoat and I have had long discussions on this subject].
This is a complex process, a three phased synchronized wave interexchange takes place so that in and out is pulsed without causing destruction. We only see the neutral middle position from light waves being produced by this process. Now, the proton is even more unique because it represents how multiple dipolar time spheres interact from small to large scales. The Meson [rotation/flipping rate at three trillion times per second between q-/q+ mirrors around torus] is a forward and reverse dipolar time sphere that has an HFTL [Higher Frequencies Than Light] exchange taking place at the centers of the quark and antiquark just like our large scale that we reside in. There are mini-black holes with matter and antimatter induction taking place exchanging antigravitons and gravitons. So, the rules change inside the Meson. Outside the MESON TORUS is different, we are in forward time so any antigravitons will be repulsed away from forward time. Antigravitons will cause a repulsive force [push a part and this relates to the balance perceived by our dimension so that matter is not crushed into oblivion]. Gravity, gravitons is the strongest not the weakest force [it is harmonically balanced with the antigraviton circuit] and this energy circuit powers our visible Universe.
A group discussion is needed in trying to understand how the graviton [HFTL-frequencies are demodulated/rectified] demodulation takes place inside protons, this is a three phase conjugated terminus almost like a controlled burn [antimatter/matter annihilation] with distribution by way of a plasmoid/gluon exchange. This is the power plant for atomic energy and is distributed to Mesons [the power behind atomic energy is extreme]. Hope this helps, John
This is a complex process, a three phased synchronized wave interexchange takes place so that in and out is pulsed without causing destruction. We only see the neutral middle position from light waves being produced by this process. Now, the proton is even more unique because it represents how multiple dipolar time spheres interact from small to large scales. The Meson [rotation/flipping rate at three trillion times per second between q-/q+ mirrors around torus] is a forward and reverse dipolar time sphere that has an HFTL [Higher Frequencies Than Light] exchange taking place at the centers of the quark and antiquark just like our large scale that we reside in. There are mini-black holes with matter and antimatter induction taking place exchanging antigravitons and gravitons. So, the rules change inside the Meson. Outside the MESON TORUS is different, we are in forward time so any antigravitons will be repulsed away from forward time. Antigravitons will cause a repulsive force [push a part and this relates to the balance perceived by our dimension so that matter is not crushed into oblivion]. Gravity, gravitons is the strongest not the weakest force [it is harmonically balanced with the antigraviton circuit] and this energy circuit powers our visible Universe.
A group discussion is needed in trying to understand how the graviton [HFTL-frequencies are demodulated/rectified] demodulation takes place inside protons, this is a three phase conjugated terminus almost like a controlled burn [antimatter/matter annihilation] with distribution by way of a plasmoid/gluon exchange. This is the power plant for atomic energy and is distributed to Mesons [the power behind atomic energy is extreme]. Hope this helps, John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.305 seconds