- Thank you received: 0
A nice little gravitational anomaly
22 years 2 months ago #3030
by Jim
Reply from was created by Jim
You can say that the Newtonian system is violated and be proven wrong since it is misplaced gravity centers that cause this problem. Every particle in these rings is contributing to the overall effect. To use a common gravity center for all effects gets the wrong result.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 2 months ago #2677
by Youjaes
Replied by Youjaes on topic Reply from James Youlton
I don't know what you mean by 'misplaced gravity centers'. Would you like to explain yourself a bit further?
James
James
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AgoraBasta
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 2 months ago #2700
by AgoraBasta
Replied by AgoraBasta on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
I don't know what you mean by 'misplaced gravity centers'. Would you like to explain yourself a bit further?
James
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I'm not Jim, but there's nothing to explain. The smallest fraction dust in that ring acts like a gas providing viscous friction, thus transfers momentum and angular velocity throughout the ring. Mind also that, "gas" is "hotter" at the outer rim due to "buoyancy". (remember - hot air goes up, he-he-he) Anything out of synchronicity either obeys or has to leave.
If you insist on any esoteric explanation, please disprove the above self-evident one first.
I don't know what you mean by 'misplaced gravity centers'. Would you like to explain yourself a bit further?
James
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I'm not Jim, but there's nothing to explain. The smallest fraction dust in that ring acts like a gas providing viscous friction, thus transfers momentum and angular velocity throughout the ring. Mind also that, "gas" is "hotter" at the outer rim due to "buoyancy". (remember - hot air goes up, he-he-he) Anything out of synchronicity either obeys or has to leave.
If you insist on any esoteric explanation, please disprove the above self-evident one first.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 2 months ago #2757
by Youjaes
Replied by Youjaes on topic Reply from James Youlton
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
I'm not Jim, but there's nothing to explain. The smallest fraction dust in that ring acts like a gas providing viscous friction, thus transfers momentum and angular velocity throughout the ring. Mind also that, "gas" is "hotter" at the outer rim due to "buoyancy". (remember - hot air goes up, he-he-he) Anything out of synchronicity either obeys or has to leave.
If you insist on any esoteric explanation, please disprove the above self-evident one first.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
You make it too easy. First, bouyancy requires pressure, and guess what? There isn't any. The region above and below the ring plane is a vacuum. In addition, the ring plane is inclined to the sun, giving practically uniform solar radiation, so a temperature gradient from this source is negligible. So, would you like to try again? And by the way, since when is an esoteric explanation a crime?
I'm not Jim, but there's nothing to explain. The smallest fraction dust in that ring acts like a gas providing viscous friction, thus transfers momentum and angular velocity throughout the ring. Mind also that, "gas" is "hotter" at the outer rim due to "buoyancy". (remember - hot air goes up, he-he-he) Anything out of synchronicity either obeys or has to leave.
If you insist on any esoteric explanation, please disprove the above self-evident one first.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
You make it too easy. First, bouyancy requires pressure, and guess what? There isn't any. The region above and below the ring plane is a vacuum. In addition, the ring plane is inclined to the sun, giving practically uniform solar radiation, so a temperature gradient from this source is negligible. So, would you like to try again? And by the way, since when is an esoteric explanation a crime?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AgoraBasta
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 2 months ago #2758
by AgoraBasta
Replied by AgoraBasta on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
You make it too easy.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I'm not making anything here. It IS easy and simple. The "gas" was used as an analogy only. Statistically, the ring appears exactly as a viscous medium for the rocks constituting it. There is internal friction from mechanical scattering and from the mutual gravitation of the rocks of the ring. So it locks in near perfect synchronicity. There's completely nothing anomalous here, niente, nada, zilch!
You make it too easy.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I'm not making anything here. It IS easy and simple. The "gas" was used as an analogy only. Statistically, the ring appears exactly as a viscous medium for the rocks constituting it. There is internal friction from mechanical scattering and from the mutual gravitation of the rocks of the ring. So it locks in near perfect synchronicity. There's completely nothing anomalous here, niente, nada, zilch!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 2 months ago #2701
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
If you want to get into the heat thing there is the "hot air" forum. I mean by "misplaced gravity centers" that modeling or math is done on the assumption the mass center of a system is the center of gravity when in fact there are many bodies in a system all contributing to the overall effect from different centers.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.309 seconds