Antigravity Research

More
19 years 1 month ago #12651 by Dangus
Replied by Dangus on topic Reply from
If you're going to cite the "Knights Templar" as a source of credible evidence, I'm not sure there's much I can do to help this discussion.

If we had anti-gravity, we'd be using it. Not even the government, and perhaps ESPECIALLY not the government, could keep that sort of thing secret. We can't even hide our nuclear secrets from the Chinese! Besides, anti-grav would be useless if the private sector didn't put a lot of R&D into it. The government is simply incapable of keeping up with current tech on it's own. We can't even handle a hurricane well.

"Regret can only change the future" -Me

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 1 month ago #12658 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
You have the right to disagree with anything that you read on this message board. However, I disagree with your generalized statements and I think you are totally wrong about national security priorities and DOD secrets. But, I will partially agree with you in regard to FEMA having a difficult time coordinating hurricane relief efforts with the local government that was totally inept in not forcing a complete evacuation given that they were warned about the severity of Katrina and the breaching of the dikes....

I in fact did see an awesome archival film of documents, pictures of craft, and actual test flights that were held in secret for many years by free masons that were involved with the research, engineering and production of german antigravity technologies that were initially developed back in the 1920's. If you had actually researched the history of Antigravity rather then just making blanket negative comments, then you would also know that antigravity research was also initiated in the United States back in the 1920's. This is prior to WWII, and in fact before the subject was locked down under existing strict security controls it was publicly discussed and researched by a long list of major DOD contractors prior to 1952. I will post some documents later that pertain to the early gravitic government research papers prior to the lock down, but first I want to get back to current public non DOD research including the Intalek Papers once I get more time. If you want to discuss this subject then please do some cursury homework, read the posts here and see the video's.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 1 month ago #14285 by Dangus
Replied by Dangus on topic Reply from
One entire side of my family is buried in the Masonic Garden in Des Moines. I'm pretty familiar with the group ;)

I've done a lot more research into this than you give me credit for. I just believe that a lot of the "footage" is a fabrication, and quite a lot of it isn't what people think it is. German research into helicopters, hovercraft, and hovering via jets is well known, and much of the supposed NAZI flying saucer footage merely shows examples of that very research. They aren't big secrets. No government on Earth is capable of keeping a secret that huge, unless of course their anti-gravity technology is so incredibly inefficient that anyone who's seen it doesn't want it. That's about the only condition I could think of where it could be kept secret, if it was useless.

"Regret can only change the future" -Me

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 1 month ago #11127 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
There are no exhaust pipes for propulsion exiting under the smooth surface of any of the german craft (posted pictures-no exhaust vents or jet air disturbances) that I saw in motion or on the extensive engineering plans that I looked at, nor can helicopters or jets move at right angles quickly and remain perfectly still in the atmosphere.

For the last year and a half I have been building my dream home overlooking a prime surf spot here on the big island of Hawaii, finally my dad and mom have just flown over to see our new house. Growing up around the defense industry, I use to as a child spend time out in Palmdale around a pool while my father worked on top secret military projects at Edwards Air Force Base. While in the military I processed security clearances for the Human Reliability Program for Nuclear Weapons. If you wandered into a secured military facility that has posted signs "Authorized Personnel Only," or "... Use of Deadly Force" and did not stop upon being approached by a security team you would be shot dead. Only a fool would think that "black projects" are public knowledge, when in fact these projects may take up to 30 years of development and you will not hear about it because the project may be classified "Top Secret" for another 50 years. If you read the existing defense industry documents that were allowed to be published prior to 1952, you will note that every major government contractor was working on antigravity. Only a very few documents after that period are available such as the Townsend Brown Antigravity Space Vehicle proposal (posted above). Prior to that time period the projects were still classified, but there was an open discussion regarding UFO's and antigravity at corporate levels. A great documentary called "Are UFO's Real?" was produced by a former Air Force information officer that showed actual black and white footage of antigravity craft defying normal flight capabilities. Also, 1952 was the year that the capital of the US was buzzed by a fleet of UFO's which may have been the final event that pushed the complete lock down on the subject in which all discussion by corporations was now off limits to the public.

Now back to rediscovering the primary principles of levitation which may redefine how gravity works as was exhibited by prior experimentation from T. Townsend Brown, J.R. Searl, and John Hutchison.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 1 month ago #11128 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Now we will finally take a look at the Intalek Papers. This watershed re-discovery by William Alek, of Intalek Corporation of "Negative Energy" that Tesla called "Radiant Energy" redefines the geometries associated with electromagnetic waveforms and gravitational interactions, creates a cold (reverse time) electrical energy state. Here is a synopsis of his discovery:

"Negative Energy is observed as a transformation of ambient thermal environmental energy to "time-reversed" electrical energy. This form of electrical energy is theorized as an electromagnetic flow of "time-reversed" displacement current that is "converged" onto electrons. This results in a "backward" or "reverse" drift flow of electrons, or what is known as "cold current". Both common current (hot current) and cold current can flow down a copper conductor simultaneously.

However, if cold current dominates the flow through a resistor for example, a "cooling" effect is observed in that resistor. The cooling effect is regarded as "negentropic" and theorized as "self-ordering" of the quantum active vacuum, which has been proven to
occur for a short period of time.

The phenomena was first observed by Nikola Tesla back in the 1880's. Tesla then devised a series of machines patented in the 1890's that greatly amplify this phenomena, which he later called RADIANT ENERGY.

INTALEK, INC. has discovered that an impulse of NEGATIVE ENERGY is released back to the source (dipole) supply from a set of mutually coupled primary/secondary coils configured as an ordinary
transformer. The "negative" mutual coupling component is established through ferromagnetic media. The secondary coil MUST have reverse residual magnetization and sufficient inductance in
order for the phenomena to occur.

INTALEK, INC. has found a way to build practical solid-state electronic products based on this discovery."

216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=INTALEK&p...ULd1e&icp=1&.intl=us

Here is Bill's post at ZPEnergy:

"I show how the mass of an object undergoes a state transition from its kinetic state to gravimetric state, back to its kinetic state. The kinetic state is considered Newtonian and therefore, subject to inertia. On the other hand, the gravimetric state is considered non-Newtonian and therefore, inertialess.


A correlation is established between a fluctuating mass, a fluctuating inductance, and a fluctuating capacitance, thereby unifying the gravitational force with the electromagnetic forces. If fluctuation should cease, the object resorts back to its original kinetic state.

The paper also shows how the gravimetric state may be used to extract electrical FREE ENERGY. Spacetime media is modeled as an aetheric gas, or exerts a graviton pressure. Simply by compressing or rarefying the spacetime media, directly affects electromagnetic energy. A "gravimetric amplifier" could be built that adroitly collects this excess electrical energy. A consequence of this action results in a variance of the local time stream with an active radius that conforms to the inverse square law. An instantaneous change in motion of the "amplifier" will also be experienced.

A fascinating correlation is also established between the gravimetric state of matter and the common photon. A photon can be modeled as a fluctuating mass that exerts a force, must travel at a constant velocity, and is entirely inertialess. Its direction of motion is only affected by gravity because it contains a property of mass.

A brief summary of my theory is shown here:
intalek.com/Index/Index.htm

Inductive and capacitive MathCAD simulations are shown here:
www.intalek.com/Papers/GIMFsim01.pdf
www.intalek.com/Papers/GCMFsim01.pdf

Finally, a theory that’s simple, stunningly exquisite, and testable.

Bill

Dear Bill,

Thanks for the sending of your paper, this seems interesting, but where I can find a simple PROOF OF CONCEPT EXPERIMENT about your Gravimetric Mass Fluctuation theory that ANYONE can perform and REPLICATE INDEPENDANTLY?

I shall be glad to conduct myself a such experiment... Don't forget that a claim is valid ONLY with some full and independent replications by independent researchers worldwide...

Best Regards
Jean-Louis Naudin
Email: JNaudin...@aol.com
Main Web site : www.jlnlabs.org

Jean-Louis,

The theory I presented, no doubt, makes some rather extraordinary "predictions". The issue is devising experiments to test the theory, which I'm in the process of doing.

Stay tuned! There's more to come.

Bill"

216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=intalek+p...ULfgy&icp=1&.intl=us

"Hello all,

I just uploaded my latest and greatest major new release 3.0 of my GMF paper:
www.intalek.com/Papers/GMF.pdf

It's 100 pages of NEW physics. The main subject of this paper is the discovery of gravitational mass, and how its related to an inertial mass. As you know, an inertial mass diverges to infinity as a vehicle approaches the speed of light, however, this is NOT the case with a gravitational mass. The speed of a gravitational mass is ONLY limited by a rate at which its mass is changing, and converges to a minimum mass at distance infinity. Therefore, controlling this mass of the vehicle controls its position within a given gravity well. The rate of speed of this vehicle could easily exceed the speed of light without inertial reactive effects because its moving gravitationally, not inertially. Since the speed of the vehicle could exceed far beyond the speed of light, Warp Factor calculations are required and example calculations are shown in this paper.

To prove my gravity theory is correct, example 5 using GPS global positioning satellites on page 40 shows the "pinpoint" accuracy of my calculations. Observe the effect of gravitational BLUE SHIFT and special relativistic RED SHIFT has on electromagnetic radio waves coming from a satellite over 20 x 10^3 km in orbit above the Earth. The "exactness" and high precision of these calculations are revealed.

In the coming weeks, I'll explain more of the incredible detail presented in my paper as I consider the REAL possibility of NOT only traveling to other star systems, but finding the "onramp" to the galactic "superhighway"! I have a feeling the traffic is --- heavy.

A brief summary of the paper is presented here:

www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/GMF/GMF.htm

So, stay tuned, strap yourself in, there's much more to come...

Bill

---
William S. Alek
FREE ENERGY and Antigravitational Technologies
groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek "

216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=intalek+p...ULf6h&icp=1&.intl=us

How does time really work? Can we travel faster then light? Here are some quotes from my previous posts that question existing physics and provide possible new directions in understanding a dual time domain:

"Even though we live in a forward time Universe where antimatter is sublimated to a secondary role in defining the relativistic processes that maintains the structure of matter and times arrow, it may be that this asymmetric role of antimatter (in our half of universe) is in itself a phase conjugation mirror of matters structural holographic template whereby phase fluctuations are anchored to a phase conjugation of the moment as the mirror reverse time template of antimatter is being reassembled into forward time template of matter. If we can understand the process of assembly of time and matter, then we will see that it is impossible to have forward time without having reverse time balancing the future motion of all waves. The picture even gets more complicated since this duality of motion with in the nuclei of all matter has a complex geometry that is fed by a duality of fields in motion at faster then light speeds (GRAVITONS AND ANTIGRAVITONS?) of extremely high frequencies that resonate within this dimension and form the gluon strings that attach to quarks and antiquarks within the nucleons. Could gravity be the result of mass locked synchronizations that form from this modulation of high frequencies with in the nuclei of atoms as they cascade into this dimension creating matter mass attractions and electromagnetic frequencies?

If both electrostatic forces and gravitons travel FTL, then there is a good chance that the photon is a subset of these higher frequencies and is created by the interactions between gravitational and electromagnetic forces. Further, the density strength of the electromagnetic fields and gravitational fields will affect the speed of light. Can light travel backwards in time? Yes, and I would also say that light can travel faster then the forward motion of time, which means that the electrostatic forces could actually also loop into forward time and an object could temporarily disappear and then reappear. Maybe light waves are dependent upon the surrounding electromagnetic fields and tunneling due to packets of photons surrounded by strong fields allows this displacement or faster then light speeds to take place with in (our) time."

.....Given these new findings about time, we may be in for a lot more surprises that may challenge existing theories of relativity regarding the interactions between forward and reverse time domains, which as noted by the results of John Hutchison effects with Tesla Coils and Van De Graf Generator most certainly may create all kinds of strange effects from levitation to reassembly of atomic structure creating cold welds of normally non mixable materials. I will next explore further Bill Alek's explanation of the Hutchison Effect.

John

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 1 month ago #14364 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Effects Powered by 'Neutrino-Capture' Technology

July 18, 2005: This new video clip shows Dr. Rex Webb demonstrating a glowing, ring-shaped device that exhibits Antigravity properties & a mysterious levitation. Webb's research has been causing a stir in the AG community since 2004, when Boyd Bushman began promoting Webb as discovering a new "Hutchison Effect".

Details on the exact nature of Webb's apparatus have not been forthcoming, but the inventor, located in Slidell, TX, claims that his research involves the capture & focusing of solar neutrino's through an optical assembly to power a coil system capable of producting "Hutchison-like Effects".

www.americanantigravity.com/articles/19/...no-Antigravity-Video

VIDEO CLIP

www.americanantigravity.com/video/RexWebb_7_18_2005.wmv

"Why anti-gravity?" Read Dr. Rex Webb's explanation:

www.neutrinoscience.com/



Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.502 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum