Einstein's Starting Point

Hi Tom,

So, here is the evidence that two "time domains" exist:

1) Antimatter and Matter balanced waveforms within all atomic structure. Reference: HERA COLLIDER EXPERIMENTS

2) Antimatter and Matter annihilations.

3) Antimatter and Matter annihilations always are symmetric in producing two matter and antimatter high energy particle waveforms.

Need I go on? Going to breakfast, Merry Christmas!!!!


John

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
<br />here is the evidence that two "time domains" exist<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Apparently, where you see fireworks, I see only grass growing. What is the connection between any of your three points and time or domains?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">1) Antimatter and Matter balanced waveforms within all atomic structure.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I've no idea what "balanced waveforms" means. But in MM, antimatter has low-density elysium atmospheres where matter has high-density elysium atmospheres, and vice versa.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">2) Antimatter and Matter annihilations.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It violates logic to think that anything can ever come into existence from nothing or cease to exist into nothing. Things can decompose, blow up, or even "annihilate", yet every single bit of substance remains in existence before, during, and after that event. When matter and antimatter annihilate, they turn into "energy", which means all their substance is reduced to ultra-small particles moving away at high speeds.

The event is not different in kind than two equal-sized asteroids hitting head-on at speeds high enough to vaporize them. All the matter in both asteroids is reduced to molecules, atoms, and smaller quantum entities streaming away. But every bit of it can still be accounted for.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">3) Antimatter and Matter annihilations always are symmetric in producing two matter and antimatter high energy particle waveforms.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Waves are simply organized disturbances of particle mediums.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Need I go on?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Need I?

And what has any of this to do with time or time reversal? -|Tom|-

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by tvanflandern</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
<br />here is the evidence that two "time domains" exist<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Apparently, where you see fireworks, I see only grass growing. What is the connection between any of your three points and time or domains?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">1) Antimatter and Matter balanced waveforms within all atomic structure.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I've no idea what "balanced waveforms" means. But in MM, antimatter has low-density elysium atmospheres where matter has high-density elysium atmospheres, and vice versa.

---

I will take a look at your data.

---

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">2) Antimatter and Matter annihilations.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It violates logic to think that anything can ever come into existence from nothing or cease to exist into nothing.

---

I never said that. Everything is connected to some cause. The cause could be ultra large dual fields that move at extreme speeds. This antimatter and matter relationship points to an effect, one that may involve a two way flow of energy.

---

Things can decompose, blow up, or even "annihilate", yet every single bit of substance remains in existence before, during, and after that event. When matter and antimatter annihilate, they turn into "energy", which means all their substance is reduced to ultra-small particles moving away at high speeds.

The event is not different in kind than two equal-sized asteroids hitting head-on at speeds high enough to vaporize them. All the matter in both asteroids is reduced to molecules, atoms, and smaller quantum entities streaming away. But every bit of it can still be accounted for.

---

I would agree with that statement.

---

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">3) Antimatter and Matter annihilations always are symmetric in producing two matter and antimatter high energy particle waveforms.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Waves are simply organized disturbances of particle mediums.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Need I go on?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Need I?

And what has any of this to do with time or time reversal? -|Tom|-

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Our Time Dimension is light spectrum specific and euclidean dynamics as you stated may hold up to speed of light and you would be correct then in stating that SR is wrong and a time geometry would hold. However, high field states may void this natural connection to our universal dimensional time. We just don't really know yet. So, time might function like an onion in specific relativities, maybe even time could be frozen given certain dynamics say at center of imploded star and maybe there are also zero states of time at higher dimensions whereby a merging may take place where all things meet. Energy states may exist that really are strange in comparison to our present understandings. As shown by the huge unexpected energy releases found in hydrogen plasmas that were formed from fractional ground states that may decouple the local time wave allowing huge flux releases from higher dimensions.

We certainly do see symmetry in the golden ratio indicating a smooth transition from higher dimensional spin dynamics being modulated into this timeline. The perfection of symmetry between matter and antimatter does not reflect a condition that resulted from chaos, but one from order. (NO BIG BANG) Whereby waveforms decelerate into this dimension of time and may cause MATTER/ANTIMATTER and all that we see and may be going in opposing directions as an inward and outward flow of continuous energy at graviton speeds or higher. Again, I will take a look at MM soon to see how the elysium and graviton motion impacts are viewed in understanding more completely your viewpoint.

John

John,

OK, you have convinced me.

It is now obvious that you have no interest in real science. You are just trolling. (What is it about b*llsh*t that you guys find so compelling? This is a serious question - I'd really like to know.)

LB

Hi Larry,

I gave you my definition of universe, now it is your turn.

If fractional ground states of hydrogen release 1000:1 ratio of energies then maybe you should take a look at the data. All existing doctrines including yours are subject to change.

How can mankind in a very short period of history frought with wars and inept use of intelligence really understand an infinite universe that has always existed. No doubt in my mind that we are primitives here on this planet as compared to off planet intelligence that may exist through out universe. I am certain that you and I both care about our future and I deeply care about the future of science.

The data will point the way, the problem is that our preconceptions keep our mind closed to all options.

The Atomic Vortex



John

[cosmicsurfer] "I gave you my definition of universe, now it is your turn."

((Guffaw)) Real definitions clear things up instead of making them murkier. Please try again. (See my suggestion from a few posts ago if you don't really have a definition.)

===

Keep in mind that we are not going to put up with your incomprehensible babbling forever. You have in fact entertained us (of course we would much rather have you educate us), but it's starting to get old now.

LB