Requiem for Relativity

(email sent last night, March 19, 2010)

Dear Prof. *******:

...Would you email or landmail me a copy of your Ph.D. thesis? I am a graduate of Harvard College, B. A., Mathematics, 1977.

I think that the 6000 year duration of creation, told by early Christians, is explained spuriously by them according to the accidental correlation, "God made the World in 6 days", "to God a day is as 1000 yr", 6x1000=6000. The truth is, that there is a real, physical, cataclysmic Earth cycle of approx. 6000 yr. Early Christians preserved this true knowledge but gave it a spurious numerological/textual explanation.

I post everything I know about this, to Dr. Tom Van Flandern's messageboard at www.metaresearch.org , under my name, Joe Keller. Here is a summary:

1. From lake varves, Brauer et al (2008) determined that the onset of the "Younger Dryas" was 12,683 years before 2012AD (exactly). The Younger Dryas phenomenon includes a mysterious "black layer" throughout much of N. America, which might signify a holocaust due to comet impacts. Almost all large animals in N. America suddenly became extinct at the time of this "black layer", as did the human "Clovis Culture".

2. Phoenix-like, human progress continued. The dog was domesticated ~13,000 yr ago and agriculture is thought to have begun at about that time.

3. Jantz & Owsley (2001) found that roughly 6000 yr ago, human cranial diversity in N. America drastically decreased. Published European data somewhat support similar change in Europe.

4. Last year I discovered by careful standard astronomical almanac calculations, that Arcturus rose heliacally at Giza at the summer solstice of ~4329BC. I applied Prof. Eduard Meyer's "Sothic dating" concept to the famous "Sothic" date of Thutmose III. I found that if this date of Thutmose III, is "1 Thoth" in the "official (360 day) calendar", and a reasonable assumption is made for the summer solstice in the "seasonal calendar", then "1 Thoth" in 4329BC, is the summer solstice, the heliacal rising of Arcturus at Giza. Therefore it is reasonable to suppose that the (now lost) Egyptian calendar began in 4329BC.

5. Phoenix-like, advanced human civilization appeared shortly after the cataclysm at that time.

6. The famous Mayan time interval, 5125 yr, though made by them into a conveniently remembered calendar, really is advanced astronomical knowledge: a common multiple of the orbital periods of Jupiter, Saturn, *and* Uranus.


Sincerely,
Joseph C. Keller, M. D.

13,000 and 6,500 years ago

According to Randles & Warrington, "UFOs: a British Viewpoint", p. 18, fig. 1 (citing Aime Michel and Gordon Creighton), "typical" central European cave art c. 14,000 yr ago, depicted four-armed humanoids (?) and domed saucers leaving tracks. Alleged UFO art exists for many dates, however.

Jack Hough, Journal of Geology 58:254-260, 1950, p. 258, fig. 2, shows that according to seafloor sediment cores from the 2nd Byrd expedition, the Ross Sea at 70 S latitude was almost perfectly free of icebergs from 6000 to 15,000 yr ago. I found this reference in Charles Hapgood, "Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings".

*********

"The 'Chronicle' [of disputed authorship] accounts 65 generations from the creation of the world to the birth of Christ; whereas the 'Commentary on Daniel' [known to be by Hippolytus] gives 60. ...[the 'Chronicle'] in presenting the patriarchs from Adam to Christ, gives a list which probably originally contained only 60 names."

- Prof. David G. Dunbar, Ph.D. thesis, pp. 42-43 (electronic text obtained from Biblical Seminary, of Hatfield, Pennsylvania).

What follows, is not discussed in the above thesis, but it occurs to me, that as a period of time, one "patriarch" might more have resembled one "lifetime" than one "generation". This is so, with the Dalai Lamas and other similar Buddhist successions.

The 1st Dalai Lama was born in 1391 and the 14th in 1935, averaging (1935-1391)/13 = 42 yr per Dalai Lama. The 15th probably will be born no sooner than 2010, which gives, alternatively, at least (2010-1391)/14 = 44 yr. Multiplying 65 patriarchs x 44 yr gives 2860BC as the time of creation. Multiplying 65 x 70 yr gives 4550BC. Jewish and Christian tradition, according to the above thesis, was 5500BC or 5502BC. (Usher's chronology gave 4004BC.)

These numbers are comparable to the date, 4328 or 4329BC, I found from studying the "Sothic" date of Thutmose III.

Hi Joe, have you tried getting an image form these guys? adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996DPS....28.1002P

Off topic a bit, the Schwarzschild equations. g / r_s ( r / c )^2 = 0.5
where g is surface grav or a body.
r_s is the Schwarzschild radius
r is the radius of the body
c is the speed of light
Change c for b, the speed of gravity and multiply that 0.5 by the ratio of the speed of light squared divided by the speed of gravity squared, with my proposed speed of gravity that would be
g / r_s ( r / b )^2 = 0.5 * 6.626E-34 (h as a pure dimensionless number)

It gives us the same answers for orbits but there's no time dilations to speak off.

Another thought here, you remember that we talked about the Reimann conjecture? Now, that's one hell of a nut to crack. So I thought, if we have gravity having an exponential fall off, and that doesn't show because of the huge distances involved with a very high speed of gravity, Something suggested by MOND. We also have the very real phenomena of negative refractive index, which means looking at "imaginary" solutions. I also have that problem of, is the speed of gravity, such that the ratio c^2 / B^2 is h or barh (again these are dimensionless numbers, as we are talking refractive indices)

So, we have e, i (or j) and pi in the Lorentzian where there's a phase change at the speed of light. Euler's famous equation springs to mind e^(i / pi)

Not sure, it might be an easier job to look at that.

To save a bit of time writing down a load of formulae, here's a couple of links. the first one is on Euler. Note that animated graphic, i thnk we can do something with that.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity

The second is on the Schwarzschild radius, where it gives the formulae for orbits.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius

Barbarossa & "excursions" (less than flips) of Earth's magnetic pole

JA Jacobs, Royal Astronomical Society Quarterly Journal 27:328-350, 1986, lists three (sometimes doubtful) magnetic excursions and their dates:

Laschamp excursion 45,400 +/- 2500 BP
Mono Lake excursion 24,500 BP
Gothenburg flip 12,350 BP

Let's add 2012-1986=26yr to these times, and divide by the 6339.5 yr period of Barbarossa's orbit:

Laschamp is 7.17 periods
Mono Lake is 3.87 periods
Gothenburg is 1.95 periods

That these three would be as close to integers as they are, is significant at p=0.88%.

Hi Joe, I'd like to pick your brains on this for a moment. I'm still looking at the Dirac cosmology and how it might relate to the "speed" of gravity. We've got.
e^2 = 1/137 * barh c aprox (m_o / 137m_e) m_e c^3 t / (4pi n t^3 c^3 /3)^0.5

Now this is in cgs units, which I'm not used to but for people used to SI units note that there's no 4pi epsilon_0

e = 4.8E-10 erg^0.5 cm^0.5
bah = 1.5E-27 erg sec
m_e = mass of electron
t = 1.06E-40

Now that m_o is taken to be the mass of the pion by Dirac and co. That's about 273 times the mass of an aelctron. So the ratio of m_o / 137 m_e is about 1.99

So let's say that the speed of gravity is either h = c^2 /b^2 or barh = c^2 / b^2 where b is the speed of gravity. Replace the c^3 with the speed of gravity and the barh = c^2 / b^2 value is very close. So just make that 1.99 ratio equal to two.

I still think I'm missing something here, it's that damn 2pi i can't account for.