EXISTENCE (not creation) Ex Nihilo

More
20 years 8 months ago #8803 by Skarp
Replied by Skarp on topic Reply from jim jim
Hmmmmm interesting. I've never felt so welcome.
Can anyone tell that I'm serious that existence is the definition of nothing through a conceptual geometric embodiment?
I'll call it {{{{{The Conceptual Geometric Embodiment Theory}}}}}.
All in Nothing.

It would seem I can't spark even a mild bit of curiosity from those in this forum. Opting out of this particular discussion is obviously the only recourse.

Carry on.



Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 8 months ago #8712 by Messiah
Replied by Messiah on topic Reply from Jack McNally
<font size="6">Hello</font id="size6"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="5">Hello</font id="size5"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="4">Hello</font id="size4"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="3">Hello</font id="size3"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="2">Hello</font id="size2">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="1">Hello .....</font id="size1">

<font size="6">Anybody there</font id="size6"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="5">there</font id="size5"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="4">there</font id="size4"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="3">there</font id="size3"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="2">there</font id="size2">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="1">there .....???</font id="size1">

Dern-it-all Skarp, see what you've done. You went and got all serious and scared everybody off . . .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 8 months ago #8587 by Skarp
Replied by Skarp on topic Reply from jim jim
Well

You could always discuss.
{{{{{{{{The Conceptual Geometric Embodiment Theory.}}}}}}}
It's actually quite self explanatory.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 8 months ago #8490 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from

<i>Originally posted by Skarp</i>
<br />Well

You could always discuss.
{{{{{{{{The Conceptual Geometric Embodiment Theory.}}}}}}}
It's actually quite self explanatory.
____________________________________________________________________

Skarp

how about this,read the pages from "Broken Circle" which will lead to topic "Creation Ex Nihilo" on this site, then perhaps you will understand why nobody is responding to you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 8 months ago #8526 by Skarp
Replied by Skarp on topic Reply from jim jim
North
Perhaps you can explain this from the broken circle thread. It's from one of your post.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">first,although absolute nothingness can exist conceptually, it is not possible in reality because absolute substance exists.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I'm taking it that you agree with me in at least some way when I say Conceptual Geometric Embodiment. It's really not that much of a stretch to say that all things are conceptual in nature, and those things are made of nothing as oppose to something. In fact one would expect this when non-existence is conceptualized. If I drive into a bridge abutment with a Buick Skylark at 60 MPH - I can explain the result every bit as much through conceptual means as the well known physical explanation. The only difference in the result is that of physical verses conceptual. If a conceptual entity acts in accordance with known physical laws - How are we to know physical verses conceptual?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 8 months ago #8492 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
Skarp(i have to do this quickly i'm going to work)

did you read it all(broken circle etc.) don't just pick out what you want,read carefully and think about what i have said above. think about the difference between reality and concept.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.368 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum