- Thank you received: 0
Deep-Gas, Deep Hot Biosphere Theory
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
17 years 1 week ago #18187
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">One more thing - the pyramids you have drawn have five sides.[LB]<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Not to be contrary (a bad habit I learned in that "other thread,") but they have 4 sides ( see Figure 1, molecular hydrogen above). The "black side" is meant to signify hollowness filled with elysium (such as labeled in first attempt above in cone-shaped proton.) And the black side is a 4-sided square, so the hollow pyramid has 4 sides—though my perspective needs help.
I'll be glad to do more drawings as I learn more, but I'm like a babe in the woods here, I need more time to study the model. In the meantime, if anyone else wants to try it, great. I just use the old fashioned "Paint" software. I don't think it can be done with my Corel Paint Pro X. Though any engineer with CAD or AUTOCAD software could do it, if he/she knew what to design. [Neil]
Not to be contrary (a bad habit I learned in that "other thread,") but they have 4 sides ( see Figure 1, molecular hydrogen above). The "black side" is meant to signify hollowness filled with elysium (such as labeled in first attempt above in cone-shaped proton.) And the black side is a 4-sided square, so the hollow pyramid has 4 sides—though my perspective needs help.
I'll be glad to do more drawings as I learn more, but I'm like a babe in the woods here, I need more time to study the model. In the meantime, if anyone else wants to try it, great. I just use the old fashioned "Paint" software. I don't think it can be done with my Corel Paint Pro X. Though any engineer with CAD or AUTOCAD software could do it, if he/she knew what to design. [Neil]
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 week ago #18283
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Gregg</i>
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
One of the characteristics of antigravity propulsion is that it causes an extreme collapse wave of electrons that cascade perpetually into the drive system [Searl device does this that is why he lost his original craft because they went directly up into space]. No power needed once process becomes self sustained.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If one can devise a molecular (crystal) structure that can bring in "random" gravitational flux and redirect it in one direction, then you have a propulsion engine with no "apparent" energy consumption. This would be, in effect, a "sailship" in outer space. Trick is, how?
Gregg Wilson
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The SEG Searl device was invented in 1946. A documnetary film is under production as we speak which will address physics and history of antigravity and energy production of the SEG. If you watched the videos which are many just look up Searl Effect Generator you will see that the rollers do not touch the wall but float in a field as they spin around ring at high speeds. This is world changing technology that will solve all of our energy problems, including space travel.
I agree a "crystal structure" or solid state antigravity device that has no moving parts and taps the Graviton 'flux' current that enables all mass to exist, could be built. Now, how do you reverse these flux tubes of force so that they push against mass away from the earth? The Hutchison Effect utilizes radio frequencies generated at 75 watts from 120 amp circuit. So, we know that it can be done with very little power requirements to make heavy objects levitate---we have the proof.
The SEG strips electrons from the surrounding environment and the positive ions now accumulate above the device forming a polarity. In forward time motion negative charge moves towards positive charge [proven by discharge of capacitors jumping towards positive pole]. Also, Gravitons are not random they form solid relationships with Mass as flux tubes of force that transfer momentum. If protons are the positive pole that gravitons terminate with [deep with in proton with some unknown particle that is in parity with antimatter reverse return wave and is at an extremely higher frequency beyond our spectrum], then motion is exchanged creating all of the other forces that bind atoms. So, maybe a highly charged positive ion field or positively charged surface could generate antigravity effects if below this field there is also a high capacitance electric field. Causing an assymetric balance of tubes of force to accumulate on electric field side of device pushing craft away from earth.
Gravitons-FTL-cascade-more then impact they are the prime force generating mass. Antigravitons also exist and are the reverse wave leaving this time zone. Mass is the intersection between two wavefronts one coming in and another going out. Antimatter is held in balance with matter, if not you generate radioactive decay, and annihilations. So, any model of pyramid shaped protons would have to take into consideration this greater interaction of wavefronts that also involves antimatter as subcomponents at all quantum scales.
Take a look at CLASSICAL ISODUAL THEORY OF ANTIMATTER:
arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/9705/9705001v1.pdf
John Rickey
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
One of the characteristics of antigravity propulsion is that it causes an extreme collapse wave of electrons that cascade perpetually into the drive system [Searl device does this that is why he lost his original craft because they went directly up into space]. No power needed once process becomes self sustained.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If one can devise a molecular (crystal) structure that can bring in "random" gravitational flux and redirect it in one direction, then you have a propulsion engine with no "apparent" energy consumption. This would be, in effect, a "sailship" in outer space. Trick is, how?
Gregg Wilson
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The SEG Searl device was invented in 1946. A documnetary film is under production as we speak which will address physics and history of antigravity and energy production of the SEG. If you watched the videos which are many just look up Searl Effect Generator you will see that the rollers do not touch the wall but float in a field as they spin around ring at high speeds. This is world changing technology that will solve all of our energy problems, including space travel.
I agree a "crystal structure" or solid state antigravity device that has no moving parts and taps the Graviton 'flux' current that enables all mass to exist, could be built. Now, how do you reverse these flux tubes of force so that they push against mass away from the earth? The Hutchison Effect utilizes radio frequencies generated at 75 watts from 120 amp circuit. So, we know that it can be done with very little power requirements to make heavy objects levitate---we have the proof.
The SEG strips electrons from the surrounding environment and the positive ions now accumulate above the device forming a polarity. In forward time motion negative charge moves towards positive charge [proven by discharge of capacitors jumping towards positive pole]. Also, Gravitons are not random they form solid relationships with Mass as flux tubes of force that transfer momentum. If protons are the positive pole that gravitons terminate with [deep with in proton with some unknown particle that is in parity with antimatter reverse return wave and is at an extremely higher frequency beyond our spectrum], then motion is exchanged creating all of the other forces that bind atoms. So, maybe a highly charged positive ion field or positively charged surface could generate antigravity effects if below this field there is also a high capacitance electric field. Causing an assymetric balance of tubes of force to accumulate on electric field side of device pushing craft away from earth.
Gravitons-FTL-cascade-more then impact they are the prime force generating mass. Antigravitons also exist and are the reverse wave leaving this time zone. Mass is the intersection between two wavefronts one coming in and another going out. Antimatter is held in balance with matter, if not you generate radioactive decay, and annihilations. So, any model of pyramid shaped protons would have to take into consideration this greater interaction of wavefronts that also involves antimatter as subcomponents at all quantum scales.
Take a look at CLASSICAL ISODUAL THEORY OF ANTIMATTER:
arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/9705/9705001v1.pdf
John Rickey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 week ago #18284
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Gregg</i>
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
One of the characteristics of antigravity propulsion is that it causes an extreme collapse wave of electrons that cascade perpetually into the drive system [Searl device does this that is why he lost his original craft because they went directly up into space]. No power needed once process becomes self sustained.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If one can devise a molecular (crystal) structure that can bring in "random" gravitational flux and redirect it in one direction, then you have a propulsion engine with no "apparent" energy consumption. This would be, in effect, a "sailship" in outer space. Trick is, how?
Gregg Wilson
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The SEG Searl device was invented in 1946. A documnetary film is under production as we speak which will address physics and history of antigravity and energy production of the SEG. If you watched the videos which are many just look up Searl Effect Generator you will see that the rollers do not touch the wall but float in a field as they spin around ring at high speeds. This is world changing technology that will solve all of our energy problems, including space travel.
I agree a "crystal structure" or solid state antigravity device that has no moving parts and taps the Graviton 'flux' current that enables all mass to exist, could be built. Now, how do you reverse these flux tubes of force so that they push against mass away from earth and not towards it? The Hutchison Effect utilizes radio frequencies generated at 75 watts from 120 amp circuit. So, we know that it can be done with very little power requirements to make heavy objects levitate---we have the proof.
The SEG strips electrons from the surrounding environment and the positive ions now accumulate above the device forming a polarity. In forward time motion negative charge moves towards positive charge [proven by discharge of capacitors jumping towards positive pole]. Also, Gravitons are not random they form solid relationships with Mass as flux tubes of force that transfer momentum. If protons are the positive pole that gravitons terminate with [deep with in proton with some unknown particle that is in parity with antimatter reverse return wave and is at an extremely higher frequency beyond our spectrum], then motion is exchanged creating all of the other forces that bind atoms. So, maybe a highly charged positive ion field or positively charged surface could generate antigravity effects if below this field there is also a high capacitance electric field. Causing an assymetric balance of tubes of force to accumulate on electric field side of device pushing craft away from earth.
Gravitons-FTL-cascade-more then impact they are the prime force generating mass. Antigravitons also exist and are the reverse wave leaving this time zone. Mass is the intersection between two wavefronts one coming in and another going out. Antimatter is held in balance with matter, if not you generate radioactive decay, and annihilations. So, any model of pyramid shaped protons would have to take into consideration this greater interaction of wavefronts that also involves antimatter as subcomponents at all quantum scales.
Take a look at CLASSICAL ISODUAL THEORY OF ANTIMATTER:
arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/9705/9705001v1.pdf
John Rickey
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Gregg</i>
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
One of the characteristics of antigravity propulsion is that it causes an extreme collapse wave of electrons that cascade perpetually into the drive system [Searl device does this that is why he lost his original craft because they went directly up into space]. No power needed once process becomes self sustained.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If one can devise a molecular (crystal) structure that can bring in "random" gravitational flux and redirect it in one direction, then you have a propulsion engine with no "apparent" energy consumption. This would be, in effect, a "sailship" in outer space. Trick is, how?
Gregg Wilson
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The SEG Searl device was invented in 1946. A documnetary film is under production as we speak which will address physics and history of antigravity and energy production of the SEG. If you watched the videos which are many just look up Searl Effect Generator you will see that the rollers do not touch the wall but float in a field as they spin around ring at high speeds. This is world changing technology that will solve all of our energy problems, including space travel.
I agree a "crystal structure" or solid state antigravity device that has no moving parts and taps the Graviton 'flux' current that enables all mass to exist, could be built. Now, how do you reverse these flux tubes of force so that they push against mass away from earth and not towards it? The Hutchison Effect utilizes radio frequencies generated at 75 watts from 120 amp circuit. So, we know that it can be done with very little power requirements to make heavy objects levitate---we have the proof.
The SEG strips electrons from the surrounding environment and the positive ions now accumulate above the device forming a polarity. In forward time motion negative charge moves towards positive charge [proven by discharge of capacitors jumping towards positive pole]. Also, Gravitons are not random they form solid relationships with Mass as flux tubes of force that transfer momentum. If protons are the positive pole that gravitons terminate with [deep with in proton with some unknown particle that is in parity with antimatter reverse return wave and is at an extremely higher frequency beyond our spectrum], then motion is exchanged creating all of the other forces that bind atoms. So, maybe a highly charged positive ion field or positively charged surface could generate antigravity effects if below this field there is also a high capacitance electric field. Causing an assymetric balance of tubes of force to accumulate on electric field side of device pushing craft away from earth.
Gravitons-FTL-cascade-more then impact they are the prime force generating mass. Antigravitons also exist and are the reverse wave leaving this time zone. Mass is the intersection between two wavefronts one coming in and another going out. Antimatter is held in balance with matter, if not you generate radioactive decay, and annihilations. So, any model of pyramid shaped protons would have to take into consideration this greater interaction of wavefronts that also involves antimatter as subcomponents at all quantum scales.
Take a look at CLASSICAL ISODUAL THEORY OF ANTIMATTER:
arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/9705/9705001v1.pdf
John Rickey
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 week ago #18282
by Gregg
Replied by Gregg on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
Take a look at CLASSICAL ISODUAL THEORY OF ANTIMATTER:
arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/9705/9705001v1.pdf
John Rickey
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This seems to be an exercise in mathematics where it parts company with physics. Matter has mass (inertial resistance to being accelerated), size, shape and <b>perhaps</b> an intrinsic velocity. What properties does anti-matter have other than an absence of the properties of matter?
One can "prove" anything with equations but is it real?
Gregg Wilson
Take a look at CLASSICAL ISODUAL THEORY OF ANTIMATTER:
arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/9705/9705001v1.pdf
John Rickey
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This seems to be an exercise in mathematics where it parts company with physics. Matter has mass (inertial resistance to being accelerated), size, shape and <b>perhaps</b> an intrinsic velocity. What properties does anti-matter have other than an absence of the properties of matter?
One can "prove" anything with equations but is it real?
Gregg Wilson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 week ago #19736
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Gregg, Actually mass is constantly being accelerated. Mass is traveling in extreme motion all the time! Galaxy center in motion at 4.4 million miles per hour, Galaxy in motion around center at 1.4 million miles per hour....with out mathematics physics is a religion. Human conditioning prevails...with 'belief' systems supporting 'Big Bang' and other myths such as GR curvature and SR speed limits---.
Actually what is happening is that Two time lines [large scale motion] like a tunnel going in opposite directions form Antimatter as a mirror of Matter and both are point like particles that enable each other to exist. Matter only exists because of Antimatter. Fermi Labs discovers Sub b Mesons rotating between Matter and Antimatter states at three trillion times per second! Gregg if that is not extreme motion then what is????
Equations are required in understanding cause and effect relationships of Physical properties. The myth busters: Dr. Tom Van Flandern has made a huge contribution to our understanding of both scale properties and the speed of Graviton. Tesla understood that Atomic Power was not intrinsic to the Atom itself but came from an outside EM source. Further proof is seen in discoveries made far back in 1946 that Mass accelerations, mass regeneration operate from outside source of power. This power can be tapped with the exact mathematical properties as explained by the 'law of squares' as discovered by John R. R. Searl works to accelerate roller magnets by the power of the Universe creating unlimited source of energy and antigravity effects!
The only reason there is any accelerations at all is because of the matter and antimatter orbital relationships. In fact nothing would exist without this separation going in opposing directions.
John Rickey
Actually what is happening is that Two time lines [large scale motion] like a tunnel going in opposite directions form Antimatter as a mirror of Matter and both are point like particles that enable each other to exist. Matter only exists because of Antimatter. Fermi Labs discovers Sub b Mesons rotating between Matter and Antimatter states at three trillion times per second! Gregg if that is not extreme motion then what is????
Equations are required in understanding cause and effect relationships of Physical properties. The myth busters: Dr. Tom Van Flandern has made a huge contribution to our understanding of both scale properties and the speed of Graviton. Tesla understood that Atomic Power was not intrinsic to the Atom itself but came from an outside EM source. Further proof is seen in discoveries made far back in 1946 that Mass accelerations, mass regeneration operate from outside source of power. This power can be tapped with the exact mathematical properties as explained by the 'law of squares' as discovered by John R. R. Searl works to accelerate roller magnets by the power of the Universe creating unlimited source of energy and antigravity effects!
The only reason there is any accelerations at all is because of the matter and antimatter orbital relationships. In fact nothing would exist without this separation going in opposing directions.
John Rickey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 week ago #18193
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
The term "antimatter" is unfortunate, however it doesn't mean "anti mass." The anti particle is exactly the same as its countepart, apart from charge. So, what do we mean by an anti neutron? A neutron has a magnetic field, and the poles are reversed for the anti neutron.
On another matter, how thick are the walls of this proton model? At the moment they have zero thickness, and therefore zero mass.
Oddly, there is somethng called a pentaquark. [8D] Something with a neutron and a pi meson, it doesn't last long though.
On the model itself, it might be an idea to look at the cone shape first. It's a conic section and there's loads of work on that particular problem.
On another matter, how thick are the walls of this proton model? At the moment they have zero thickness, and therefore zero mass.
Oddly, there is somethng called a pentaquark. [8D] Something with a neutron and a pi meson, it doesn't last long though.
On the model itself, it might be an idea to look at the cone shape first. It's a conic section and there's loads of work on that particular problem.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.870 seconds