- Thank you received: 0
EXISTENCE (not creation) Ex Nihilo
19 years 7 months ago #13463
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
<br />No outside no inside, no beginning, no end. I guess you could say God = Universe.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
explain the above. and prove it.
<br />No outside no inside, no beginning, no end. I guess you could say God = Universe.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
explain the above. and prove it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 7 months ago #13335
by DWB
Replied by DWB on topic Reply from Duane Brown
Not sure what you want but here goes...
If there is no "outside" then there can be no inside.
If there is no "beginning" then there can be no end.
If God was "only" thing, then by the definition of this message board of Universe = God.
I don't think God can be put into a Box so easily.
Not sure what you desire proven: hope this helps.
Duane Brown
If there is no "outside" then there can be no inside.
If there is no "beginning" then there can be no end.
If God was "only" thing, then by the definition of this message board of Universe = God.
I don't think God can be put into a Box so easily.
Not sure what you desire proven: hope this helps.
Duane Brown
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 7 months ago #13175
by Messiah
Replied by Messiah on topic Reply from Jack McNally
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
<br />Not sure what you want but here goes...
If there is no "outside" then there can be no inside.
If there is no "beginning" then there can be no end.
If God was "only" thing, then by the definition of this message board of Universe = God.
I don't think God can be put into a Box so easily.
Not sure what you desire proven: hope this helps.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> It appears that if we were to ask the question - "Does God Exist?", your answer wouldn't be "YES" or "NO" , but somewhere in between . . . makes your logic kind of hard to follow.
<br />Not sure what you want but here goes...
If there is no "outside" then there can be no inside.
If there is no "beginning" then there can be no end.
If God was "only" thing, then by the definition of this message board of Universe = God.
I don't think God can be put into a Box so easily.
Not sure what you desire proven: hope this helps.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> It appears that if we were to ask the question - "Does God Exist?", your answer wouldn't be "YES" or "NO" , but somewhere in between . . . makes your logic kind of hard to follow.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 7 months ago #12580
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
<br />Not sure what you want but here goes...
If there is no "outside" then there can be no inside.
but both "outside" and "inside" exists in a confined construct.the universe.
____________________________________________________________________
If there is no "beginning" then there can be no end.
substance is infinite, therefore has absolute existence. nothing has no construct(Space,time and Dimension) the absolute opposite to substance. there is no begining or end.
____________________________________________________________________
If God was "only" thing, then by the definition of this message board of Universe = God.
as i said substance is absolute. therefore so is existence.
_____________________________________________________________________
I don't think God can be put into a Box so easily.
god is in the strictess of terms is life. the universe is random. therefore not based on god because the universe does not share the "god" perspective.
_____________________________________________________________________
Not sure what you desire proven: hope this helps.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
the universe is not emotional. it just is.
<br />Not sure what you want but here goes...
If there is no "outside" then there can be no inside.
but both "outside" and "inside" exists in a confined construct.the universe.
____________________________________________________________________
If there is no "beginning" then there can be no end.
substance is infinite, therefore has absolute existence. nothing has no construct(Space,time and Dimension) the absolute opposite to substance. there is no begining or end.
____________________________________________________________________
If God was "only" thing, then by the definition of this message board of Universe = God.
as i said substance is absolute. therefore so is existence.
_____________________________________________________________________
I don't think God can be put into a Box so easily.
god is in the strictess of terms is life. the universe is random. therefore not based on god because the universe does not share the "god" perspective.
_____________________________________________________________________
Not sure what you desire proven: hope this helps.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
the universe is not emotional. it just is.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 7 months ago #12583
by DWB
Replied by DWB on topic Reply from Duane Brown
North:
If we had a long discussion we probably would find we agree on most things. A few sentences hardly defines a person. Maybe I should first read every post on this board before posting again, because I obviously have no idea what were talking about.
Duane Brown
If we had a long discussion we probably would find we agree on most things. A few sentences hardly defines a person. Maybe I should first read every post on this board before posting again, because I obviously have no idea what were talking about.
Duane Brown
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 7 months ago #13396
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
<br />North:
If we had a long discussion we probably would find we agree on most things. A few sentences hardly defines a person. Maybe I should first read every post on this board before posting again, because I obviously have no idea what were talking about.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
you made the statement that god=universe i disagreed. i thought that is what we were talking about. if i'm wrong let me know what you then meant.
<br />North:
If we had a long discussion we probably would find we agree on most things. A few sentences hardly defines a person. Maybe I should first read every post on this board before posting again, because I obviously have no idea what were talking about.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
you made the statement that god=universe i disagreed. i thought that is what we were talking about. if i'm wrong let me know what you then meant.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.741 seconds