My pareidolia knows no bounds.

Oh,now I see what you're getting at.

If we do not do something like this, how are we going to talk about pareidolia (currently UNDEFINED)? Actually it currently has MULTIPLE definitions, but what is the difference?

I am still open to a discussion on this matter. How do we resolve the issue of the meaning of 'the word'?

But until ONE of you makes a post that defines 'the word' <u>according to the rules</u>, I'm going to start smiting you soon, whenever a reply mentions 'the word'.

LB
***
What if we banish the member that is pointing to the original 18th century definition? The one that no one else here has ever used? It's all his fault, isn't it?
***

Sorry Derosa, but this thread is as dead Pareidolia.

Good by.

Zip Monster

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />
But until ONE of you makes a post that defines 'the word' <u>according to the rules</u>, I'm going to start smiting you soon, whenever a reply mentions 'the word'.

LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Didn't I just do it correctly two messages up?

rd

Larry, you're going to have to tell me what's wrong with my last attempt before I can continue. In reality, there is a common understanding of the meaning as sanctioned by a scientist of the caliber of a Carl Sagan.

This attempt to turn it into a mental disorder, because we refuse to believe Mars is littered with artwork is a diversion.

Let me know.

Actually you did.

But we had already spiraled down into a flame war. Or something similar.

Too hot - too fast.

Sorry - my plan did not work as well as I had hoped.

LB