- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
10 years 11 months ago #21648
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
My 'banish' comment was tongue-in-cheek. But with the posts flying so fast it just made things worse.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 11 months ago #21463
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
We just did a whole page in about 45 minutes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 11 months ago #21464
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<b>[rderosa] "Sorry Larry, but I think you lost me. Just when I was getting the idea."</b>
You did. But I missed it. See one of my posts on the previous page.
You did. But I missed it. See one of my posts on the previous page.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 11 months ago #21947
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Possibly. He may actually be sincere. And the nasty thing about that is that we could never <u>prove</u> him wrong without going to Mars.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
That's true. But I've often said that's what makes this the ideal case to study.
On Earth, if we see an image on a mountain wall for instance, we can go there an look at it closely. If it disappears up close, or we see why we thought it was a face, we know how to interpret it. If it persists up close, it means some indigent people etched it.
Since we can't prove anything on Mars, apparently, we are really getting to a subject that may never have been explored this deeply before.
rd
<br />Possibly. He may actually be sincere. And the nasty thing about that is that we could never <u>prove</u> him wrong without going to Mars.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
That's true. But I've often said that's what makes this the ideal case to study.
On Earth, if we see an image on a mountain wall for instance, we can go there an look at it closely. If it disappears up close, or we see why we thought it was a face, we know how to interpret it. If it persists up close, it means some indigent people etched it.
Since we can't prove anything on Mars, apparently, we are really getting to a subject that may never have been explored this deeply before.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 11 months ago #21649
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /> If it disappears up close, or we see why we thought it was a face, we know how to interpret it. If it persists up close, it means some indigent people etched it.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This is precisely why I've occasionally posted real Earth images, and even a Cat or two.
One of my basic premises has always been the common sense viewpoint: see it clearly enough, and you're most likely going to be able to tell.
Have we ever really seen anything that convincing?
rd
<br /> If it disappears up close, or we see why we thought it was a face, we know how to interpret it. If it persists up close, it means some indigent people etched it.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This is precisely why I've occasionally posted real Earth images, and even a Cat or two.
One of my basic premises has always been the common sense viewpoint: see it clearly enough, and you're most likely going to be able to tell.
Have we ever really seen anything that convincing?
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 11 months ago #15118
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Zip Monster</i>
<br />Sorry Derosa, but this thread is as dead Pareidolia.
Good by.
Zip Monster
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Why not make your case as best you can? You could call yours Pareidolia (MS DOS)
rd
<br />Sorry Derosa, but this thread is as dead Pareidolia.
Good by.
Zip Monster
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Why not make your case as best you can? You could call yours Pareidolia (MS DOS)
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.479 seconds