Speeding away

Another issue on redshift- if you observed from 10 billion light years from here and looked at the redshift would it still appear the universe was ~15 billion years old? At that distance from here how would an object we see as redshifted to z=6 be seen?

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Another issue on redshift- if you observed from 10 billion light years from here and looked at the redshift would it still appear the universe was ~15 billion years old? At that distance from here how would an object we see as redshifted to z=6 be seen?


<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

jim

the way i see it, what we can see from our point of view would also be seen from 15 billion light yrs. from here.and whether the universe is 15 billion yrs.old or not(this assumes that the big bang is correct,which i do not think that it is)is the point, is it? is perspective missleading us (a sort of human self centeredness,the universe revoles around us!?)and that this hinders seeing the truth?

In the model I would propose - There would be a difference if you were to observe from a location say 15 billion light years away from earth. The material in that location would also be much younger...by billions of years. I would propose a much older universe from it's initial beginning to now than the current Big Bang model. The model would propose that everything is moving away from a central point at various speeds depending on distance from center, and all of it is slowing down but never to a stop.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
In the model I would propose - There would be a difference if you were to observe from a location say 15 billion light years away from earth. The material in that location would also be much younger...by billions of years. I would propose a much older universe from it's initial beginning to now than the current Big Bang model. The model would propose that everything is moving away from a central point at various speeds depending on distance from center, and all of it is slowing down but never to a stop.




<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

jright

if what you say is true (possible)then would we not be able to see things moving away from the side?from our perspective we seem to be in the centre,we don't seem to see anything moving past us,or just in front.

Why couldn't two observers that are 10 billion light years apart from each other see the same redshifted objoect at the same time? Object being seen near to where the BB says the young universe is and the two observers at different locations in the current universe.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Why couldn't two observers that are 10 billion light years apart from each other see the same redshifted objoect at the same time? Object being seen near to where the BB says the young universe is and the two observers at different locations in the current universe.


<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

a double red shift, how?