Antigravity Research

More
17 years 1 month ago #17973 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Stoat, Don't fret or get discouraged, so your guy along with most all of the other physicists do not like the idea of FTL GRAVITONS because of GR and supposed curvature of space around mass, and SR speed limit. Here is the problem, light speed alone cannot cause the incredible spin of mesons that rotate between states of matter & antimatter at three trillion x per second, and all of these unexpected high rotations from Galaxies to sub particles must have some outside source causing this exchange of energy and it must make contact---here I will say it louder the high rotations are caused by CONTACT with FASTER THEN LIGHT GRAVITONS!!!!

Plus there is ZERO questioning about why there is so much extreme motion. It is just not talked about, and the entropic running down Big Bang which is a non-regenerative Universe model does not really address all this motion except that the missing mass must be some yet to be discovered repulsive DARK MATTER. All energy comes from some outside source, yet we fail miserably in understanding that huge circulations dictate the precision of geometries found in matter and life itself.

John

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 1 month ago #19784 by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Hi John, I'm thinking about his failure to respond. It can't be that I've moved the speed of gravity downwards, to link it to the perimitivity of free space. He doesn't like the idea of ftl gravity anyway! We did talk for ages about Linda Howe's alleged ufo fragment. A lot of that was about wrapping a spaceship in a neg r.i. space, to make it go faster than light. So, he has no problems with that. The idea that space is complex, has a real and imaginary aspect to it. No problems there. That we live in the imaginary part; perhaps, it is something that could be construed as being damaging to the old ego but so what! If we do, then tough, live with it. He may not like the idea that the ball of neg r.i. material in our sun doesn't have to stay at the centre. I find that disturbing as well. It contains the principle moment of inertia; for a proton let's say, it can be outside the proton but it's smaller than h, so we can be happy about it. For a sun however, we would have an invisible ball of stuff that contains half the electromagnetic energy of the sun, sitting at times outside the sun. I think this idea is what has him silent. A planet's orbit is going to be around this thing and not the visual sun. What ever it is, it aint space time curvature, it's a real ugly brute of a thing. At least it would be if we could see it [:D][8D]

(Edited) If we look at that volcano again. A couple of blue photons are walking along a plain, about a thousand feet above sea level. They come to a volcano and climb it. They become redder and redder as they climb, out of breath [:D] At the volcono rim they wander about, they can't stop walking anyway. Then they decide to go down into the caldera. As they descend they get their normal blueness back but when they reach the thousand foot mark they start to go faster than they are used to. Fair enough.

Now, let's suppose that the volcano can move, but not the floor of the volcano. On one side of the volcano the wall becomes thinner. Does it collapse down to ground level? So that our photons can just drop down to sea level without the tedious mountain climbing part of the job [8D]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 1 month ago #18118 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Stoat, Something you said got my attention regarding dividing light speed/graviton which would generate a negative number. At graviton speeds suddenly slowing down to light speed certainly would create some sort of a shock wave. I am not certain that you can divide light by gravity and really have this account for any actual real situation. But, what images did result from seeing high speeds suddenly reverse into a negative number, was that maybe this some how relates to the negative refractive index which results from the flipping state [forming antimatter/antigraviton return circuit] that takes place after the conversion of gravitons to light [gravitostatic field/bec/phonons between gluons/magnetic forces]. Alright, so maybe a shadow does exist on the back side of rotation that is slightly out of phase [may not be able to see it] a following ghost mass that traverses backwards, a tail of showering antigravitons heading towards the other side of the dipole.

Hopefully your friend will contact you soon. John

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 1 month ago #18119 by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Hi John, sure there would be a wake of gravitational energy. Though not much until the graviton smacks into neg r.i. region. Now, it would be faster than light but in this region electrons are allowed to travel faster than light. Again we must remind ourselves that an electron going at some percentage of light speed is starting to get into the ball park for picking up this contracted speed of gravity energy.

If we want to make a photon, we add frequencies over a range, that creates a pulse of energy which has a particle's entropy. The more frequencies we add the more dense this particle becomes. Ftl frequencies have to be available, as how else can we explain photons travelling faster than light in diamond lets say. Are gravitational frequencies available? One thing has to be allowed for. Our part of the universe is gravitationally very cold. A phase transition occurs at light speed. If the electromagnetic energy is flipping over, then the gravitational frequencies, if they can be added, will tend to make our photon less dense rather than more.

Shades of the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy, we should be looking for the magic number
1/137, the fine structure constant So far we've got pi and we've got an exponential, and we have a ball park figure for the speed of gravity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 1 month ago #18269 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Stoat, I have a friend that lives close by [he may be doing a tv series on what he discovered] has worked out a number matrix that repeats in exact replications showing incoming and outgoing wave, spacings, geometries, that repeat in all aspects. At some point I will collaborate with him and see what we can see. Back to outgoing wave motion it should cross over the incoming wave in perfect symmetry only the incoming and outgoing pulse must be synchronized so that there is no distortion effects [echos, shadows, coronas, resonance, could be wave cross over distortion effects]. Particles resonate from the incoming pulse and some interferrence must take place in wave dispersions forming geometries of shapes star configurations, dispersion of emf, etc. Maybe there is a 'burn rate' the burn being the energy dynamic keeping a particle alive for as long as the rate of incoming wave motion is synchronious/maintained. The fact that antiparticles form during particle formation leaves us with an unresolved situation: Where do these reverse wave particles end up going?

Some must spin as a secondary wave partner right along with the radiation but go unnoticed until either annihilation, or spliting takes place such as in a cooper pair. Literally, our FORWARD TIME MOTION "world" is tunneling through a forward view and reverse view that operates at different TIME rates of MOTION that includes a forward view of the tunnel and a backward tunnel view that is going in the opposite direction. You are also correct about our spectrum being 'cold' in comparison to the higher spectrum where the Graviton originates. Could our half of forward motion [other half in reverse motion] within this range of spectrum of light [scale] just be one side of a gigantic 'Cooper Pair' travelling through a huge raceway [super conducting imbedded in a higher range/spectrum that is also rotating around a common axis] at incredible speeds while slowly rotating around itself?

If particles form as pairs of matter and antimatter, then most likely so does our Universe.

John Rickey

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 1 month ago #18120 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
RECIPROCAL MOTION MODEL OF UNIVERSE [work in progress - update]

“The Theoretical Framework for a Continuous Creation Model of Universe that is balanced in Reciprocal Motion; here are the primary points: 1) The Universe has always existed, 2) Space is infinite, flat, and without curvature; only fields of energized particles in motion generate mass, time, and curvature, 3) The Universe operates in a wide range of motion to include infinitely small atomic structure to infinitely large circulations of mass, a wide range of motion above and below the speed of light, and a wide range of frequencies that operate above or below the frequencies of light, 4) the faster the speed of motion by a particle the higher the frequencies generated, 5) All mass in motion is the result of a higher scale cascade of higher frequencies and higher speed particles in motion collapsing into lower frequency lower speed range of scales of motion creating mass accelerations, mass regeneration, gravity and all quantum forces, 6) In a multiple scale wide spectrum Universe, each range of motion has a specific band width of frequencies such as found within the visible universe spectrum of light that is the base rate of motion within that scale, all atomic particles with in a given scale of motion forms an inverse mirror of large scale order with each successively smaller sub particles representing cycling of ever higher frequencies that are matched to greater universe motions that also form in pairs of matter and antimatter opposing rotations in a wide range of ever greater scales of size, frequency, and speeds of motion around coordinated axis centers of rotation, 7) Within all scales of motion, gravity and mass accelerations are the result of opposing circulations of Matter and Antimatter portions of Universe accelerating around each other attempting to collapse back to the zero point, 8) In Forward Time Domains, Matter is the primary substance and the bound Antimatter particles with Matter take on the properties of Matter; whereas in Reverse Time Domains, Antimatter is the dominant particle and we can only see the interaction between the two domains in CP violations, and in virtual pair formations resulting in annihilations and relativity jets from centers of Black Holes where we are able to recognize the interactions with Antimatter circuits operating within Reverse Time Domain circulations, 9) Graviton impacts represent the leading edge of the Forward Time Wave and are absorbed by Matter, upon Nucleonic absorption the wave reverses and exits from a partner Antimatter sub particle forming Antigravitons in a much reduced energy state creating a repulsive force, and finally, 10) The law of attraction of opposites, as revealed in large scale attractions between Forward and Reverse Time Domains perpetuates the recycling of energies and the continuous Creation of the Universe.”

John Rickey

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.461 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum