- Thank you received: 0
Antigravity Research
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
17 years 1 week ago #18200
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Stoat, Did your professor friend get in touch with you finally? I want to explore the energy cycle of Universe...explore how a structure might look how bands of motion might interact. If Gravitons are a cascade from a higher frequency scale of motion then what would that scale look like? If matter and antimatter are going in opposite directions of motion around centers on large scales how do they contact each other without causing complete annihilation? Maybe the two time domains have a controlled annihilation that feeds back to the highest scale of motion causing the entire cascade and feedstock energies to drive subscale motions.
If so we should be able to see this arcing take place during collider experiments between sub particls of matter and antimatter when they separate and return to their time domains. Also, we should be able to tap this process to generate controlled burns for generating power. Controlled annihilations must drive Universe at all scales/ levels. The other factor is just how huge distances and non-locallities are bridged by very high scale energies represented at very small sub atomic levels. It is almost a multi-dimensional relationship that must exist that is invisible to our 3d perspective.
John Rickey
If so we should be able to see this arcing take place during collider experiments between sub particls of matter and antimatter when they separate and return to their time domains. Also, we should be able to tap this process to generate controlled burns for generating power. Controlled annihilations must drive Universe at all scales/ levels. The other factor is just how huge distances and non-locallities are bridged by very high scale energies represented at very small sub atomic levels. It is almost a multi-dimensional relationship that must exist that is invisible to our 3d perspective.
John Rickey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 week ago #19932
by Cole
Replied by Cole on topic Reply from Colleen Thomas
Why not consider electricity instead of antimatter, gravity and such? Electricity is the strongest force known and can account for all the otherwise considered "anomolies" in space. H Alfven's nobel prise was based on this idea, after all. Much advancement and support for the electric universe model has come forward in the last few years due to probes sampling materials "out there."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 week ago #18201
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Cole, Actually it is all the same energy just in different forms. You have to see the entire perspective on how the energy cycles work. Electric currents are similar to Graviton currents just that Gravitons operate above the frequency and speed of light. So, these currents are impacting all mass first, then electrical circuits are a secondary system. Antimatter is from a reverse time domain and has its own circuits that operate in that domain. The recycling part that creates the motion is the balance between the two forward and reverse domains caused by a controlled annihilation between matter and antimatter on large/small scales.
John
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 week ago #18289
by Cole
Replied by Cole on topic Reply from Colleen Thomas
I guess I just don’t buy into the graviton theory (yet). None has ever been produced or caught through examination. This does not mean they don’t exist, after all I believe in the sub-quantum aether that has only marginal evidence to support its existence. What troubles me is the idea that anything to do with gravity, including its supposed carrier, could in any way eclipse the forces of electrical energy. In fact, it is my belief that gravity is an electrical side effect. When close objects experience gravity strongly but as they become distant the force of gravity levels out to be equal amongst all particles in the universe. Should the charge of the particles repel one another the force of gravity is easily overcome. It is agreed that it is all the same energy.
In terms of aether theory, it supports what you say in that there are both forward and reverse time domains coupled with matter and antimatter. But you are also correct in that the two cannot coexist in the same reference frame. They are pulsed out of the aether’s toroidal structure; the upper ½ spin (from our perspective) does not experience the lower ½ spin. It’s sort of like having a spool of yarn where you are pulling the inner most end and the outermost end at the same time. The whole spool spins but the ends never “experience” each other as they are headed in opposite directions.
I’ve been reading your posts for many months and know that we are on the same page with many things but this is one where I have to object for sanity’s sake The idea that matter is created and annihilated sits well with me, but not in the manner you suggest.
The Casimir effect is no doubt the observation of new matter evolving out of the environment (aether). Certain conditions seem to create extra stress on the environment and cause discrete packets of angular momentum to take form. Because matter is in essence an electrical creature we can measure its addition to an environment, such as between plates of metal or the corona of stars. Annihilation of matter is simply to strip an entity of its spin/angular momentum. Colliders subdivide particles into bits that are too small to maintain their spin momentum so they swiftly evaporate back into their environment (the aether).
If you haven’t yet found this paper on your own, let me point you to a very productive aether physics model. The inventor has managed to work from the foundations of his model up to accurate prediction of the 1s binding energies of the electrons for all the elements in the periodic chart. This shouts loudly that of all the theories of everything out there, this one is truly on to something real and reliable.
www.16pi2.com/electron_binding_energies.htm
In terms of aether theory, it supports what you say in that there are both forward and reverse time domains coupled with matter and antimatter. But you are also correct in that the two cannot coexist in the same reference frame. They are pulsed out of the aether’s toroidal structure; the upper ½ spin (from our perspective) does not experience the lower ½ spin. It’s sort of like having a spool of yarn where you are pulling the inner most end and the outermost end at the same time. The whole spool spins but the ends never “experience” each other as they are headed in opposite directions.
I’ve been reading your posts for many months and know that we are on the same page with many things but this is one where I have to object for sanity’s sake The idea that matter is created and annihilated sits well with me, but not in the manner you suggest.
The Casimir effect is no doubt the observation of new matter evolving out of the environment (aether). Certain conditions seem to create extra stress on the environment and cause discrete packets of angular momentum to take form. Because matter is in essence an electrical creature we can measure its addition to an environment, such as between plates of metal or the corona of stars. Annihilation of matter is simply to strip an entity of its spin/angular momentum. Colliders subdivide particles into bits that are too small to maintain their spin momentum so they swiftly evaporate back into their environment (the aether).
If you haven’t yet found this paper on your own, let me point you to a very productive aether physics model. The inventor has managed to work from the foundations of his model up to accurate prediction of the 1s binding energies of the electrons for all the elements in the periodic chart. This shouts loudly that of all the theories of everything out there, this one is truly on to something real and reliable.
www.16pi2.com/electron_binding_energies.htm
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 week ago #20439
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Cole, I will read your reference. You make some good points, the problem is scale...sure electric fields could certainly provide antigravity effects and casimir effects. But, you are talking about one flat scale paired with another flat scale ...which has subscales, so no gravitons means no higher scale energies. look at it this way, matter is like a hole in a sea of energy...now I know you agree with that point and if higher frequencies exist which I am certain that our spectrum is not the only spectrum of frequencies out there then a pouring into the hole driving momentum at all levels of these higher frequency FTL 'ELECTRONS' or GRAVITONS [FTL HFTL-WOULD OPERATE ABOVE OUR SPECTRUM INVISIBLE] would be creating all the motion. It is all the same energy we just give them different names....John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 week ago #18290
by Cole
Replied by Cole on topic Reply from Colleen Thomas
… “if higher frequencies exist which I am certain that our spectrum is not the only spectrum of frequencies out there then a pouring into the hole driving momentum at all levels of these higher frequency ''ELECTRONS'' or GRAVITONS would be creating all the motion.”
Indeed so. There is a “preeminent” force for which the aether is but a manifold between it and this material universe but of which all things are comprised.
In the model I mentioned before the guy gives this force the name of G-Force (short of God force of course). The intensity of that energy is immense (a “force, equal to 121 million billion billion billion billion newton, that drives each quanta of space-time and mediates each of the forces that holds the Universe together”)
www.16pi2.com/gforce.htm
So again, I’m agreeing with you, I just would describe it differently than you do.
Indeed so. There is a “preeminent” force for which the aether is but a manifold between it and this material universe but of which all things are comprised.
In the model I mentioned before the guy gives this force the name of G-Force (short of God force of course). The intensity of that energy is immense (a “force, equal to 121 million billion billion billion billion newton, that drives each quanta of space-time and mediates each of the forces that holds the Universe together”)
www.16pi2.com/gforce.htm
So again, I’m agreeing with you, I just would describe it differently than you do.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.401 seconds