Antigravity Research

Hi Stoat, Yes for some reason I saw the same effect with the wobble when Mars was a moon of Fifth planet I visualized it in a not quite fixed rotation but with an over rotation that was constantly correcting itself with a back and forth motion. Kind of a strange phenomenon, what is amazing is the huge size of the bulge and volcanoes located on top of bulge. The three volcanoes reminded me of Orions belt.

I also think EPH is triggered by the failed binary system [failed binary system due to collision with another system causing gravitational collapse] dwarf sister sun and may have actually been a direct hit by one of the planetoids that travel with the red dwarf. Especially on smaller planetoids such as a sister planet to Mars. It would be much harder to overload a rocky planet and cause it to explode because the gravitational pressures are already reduced by the small size.

After destruction of Fifth planet, Mars replenished its atmosphere from all of the volcanism which most likely also resulted in years of torrential rains. If a second blast occured it may have mostly been small particles but enough of a blast to blow away a large portion of the atmosphere.

Regarding letter to NASA, there is so much suppression of information that I doubt if EPH is even something they would talk about. Much less a rogue sister sun that comes through the solar system every 3600 years causing potential destruction. There is so much evidence of ancient civilizations on Mars and Moon that NASA must know a lot more then what we are currently being told.

John

Hi John, it would be like our moon, a slightly eccentric orbit would allow more than fifty percent of the surface to be seen. What I mean by the overshoot though, is that the planet's rotation speeds up from a month; or should that be a "manth;" to nearly twenty four hours. It's the planet's mantle that's shifting round nearly fifty degrees, and from a slow start, all that inertia means that it goes past equilibrium before returning to its new equilibrium.

As for NASA, it's simply the rules of the game, they have to be conservative. In fact I'm glad that they don't come out with a theory of the month. There is a case to be made however, that they should computer model EPH if only as a comparison study. A computer model will be done, as it's very important in terms of terrestrial planets in other solar systems. There's so many variables involved that the job has to be done by a super computer.

I don't know, perhaps Tom Van Flandern has already tried. I don't think that readers of this board should write letters. If i got a letter from me, I'd tear it up, the man's an idiot. [8D][][)]

Hi Stoat, I agree that NASA is conservative. However, there is still major suppression regarding known facts and stated theories. Most of us on this board are more aware of "why" motion takes place in Universe because we accept that Gravitons travel FTL. While existing GR and SR mainstream notions require scientists to constantly do work arounds to fit data that includes extreme motions. I ask NASA, why is everything moving so fast?

SEG, gravitomagnetic field generators, strip electrons from surrounding atmosphere create lift above 600 RPM--as witnessed by NASA. Now, our galaxy center rotates at 4.4 million miles per hour and galaxy is in motion at 1.4 million miles per hour through space. Obviously, high speed rotations store a lot of energy that can be transferred instantly into extreme motion. The faster the rotation the higher the potential for motion. Black project scientists of course already know all of this and of course we are kept in the dark.

Let's again look at the ISO-DUAL extreme motion of SUB B MESONS as a model of subscale inverse mirror of larger scale motion [Rotate between Matter and Antimatter pairs at three trillion times per second-Fermi Labs]. Can you draw a graph with your computer graphic skills that could look at scale size variables?

1. Graph of size forward time domain comparisons, from atoms, solar systems, galaxies, super galaxies, mega galaxies, super mega galaxies, mega mega galaxy rotations, etc.

2. Then extrapolate opposing reverse time domains and fit to scale beginning with visible ISODUAL matter and antimatter SUB B MESON's in dual rotation at three trillion times per second which is matched with larger scale motion.

So that the Graph should be straight lines revealing [cross over of graph lines indicates relationship with reverse time domains] extreme size differences from atoms, solar systems, galaxies, super galaxies, etc = size relationships of one half of time domain paired rotations.

Latest count of galactic directions of rotation indicates a common pattern of left handedness. I predict that Void Windows of empty space will eventually reveal another Arm within our Super Galaxy that all visible Galaxies are traveling around in. Expansion is simply space expanding from motion away from a Center within a Super Galactic structure. Just as our solar system is traveling away from hot "Creational Zones" from extreme central motion at 4.4 million miles per hour around rotational Center. Our GALACTIC extreme motion through space is 1.4 million miles per hour...All mass is constantly being regenerated by this collapsing larger scale fields at 3 trillion times per second from Gravitons---how large is this inverse mirror from SUB B MESONS to Large Scale paired motions????...the SOLAR SYSTEM rotation is much slower and is kicked away from faster motion of center. Positron Jets at poles indicates ANTIGRAVITON ftl activity from greater field interactions with our partner reverse time domains.

Let's explore these size comparisons. In an infinite Universe with vast rotations balanced in forward and reverse time.

John Rickey

WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED THAT MOST GALAXIES IN THE VISIBLE PORTION OF UNIVERSE ARE LEFT HANDED:

"Based on conclusions from over one-hundred-thousand GalaxyZoo volunteers as part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey project, most galaxies seem to be rotating counterclockwise in relation to the Earth. Astronomers wonder why?

Preliminary results from the volunteers indicate that the universe possesses the property called “handedness.” That is, most galaxies seem to be left-handed, or prefer to rotate counterclockwise when looked at from our position on the planet Earth.

However, astronomers are surprised by this finding. They would have thought, based on current theories on the origins and evolution of the universe, that galaxies throughout the universe possessed randomness with respect to rotation. If such theories hold true, then handedness would also be random; that is, about half of them would be right-handed (rotating clockwise) and the other half of them would be left-handed (rotating counterclockwise).

In addition, the property of handedness would be pretty much evenly distributed throughout the universe: counterclockwise rotating galaxies interspersed with clockwise rotating galaxies in a random mix. Instead, most galaxies were found to be left-handed.

This finding, thus, needs to be explained.

Astronomers will be studying this result in further detail in the future with the hope of finding out why this lefthandedness occurs in the universe.

A group of astronomers recently developed GalaxyZoo as a different but very effective way to identify one million galaxies that were in need of being classified. They asked thousands of volunteers to help organize about one million photographs of galaxies taken by a digital camera mounted on a telescope located at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico (United States).

The volunteers were asked to identify galaxies as either elliptical or spiral, and to state in which direction each galaxy rotated.

The project is called the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, but the volunteer project is called GalaxyZoo.


The project was written about in the July 13, 2007 iTWire article “GalaxyZoo: Galactic number of volunteers needed to identify 1 million galaxies.”

www.itwire.com.au/content/view/15283/1075/

The reason that I am not surprised is that most likely the generalized form of rotating systems as found in solar systems and the parent Galaxy are organized in further rotational larger scale assemblies. There will be a generalized direction of motion as noted in our galaxies motion towards the so called great attractor. Everywhere we look we see the same generalized formations that were all created as part of this larger organized rotation around a mega galactic system. These mega systems again are moving in extreme motion relative to each other as part of a huge arm of Universe expanding away from each other as they move away from faster centers of rotation and hot creational zones. All motion is caused by opposing matter and antimatter portions of Universe trying to collapse back to zero but they cannot so these domains perpetually revolve around huge centers of rotation. Literally, the Universe only exists because of this perpetual motion between large scale rotations creating huge collapsing fields of energy resulting in gravitons and mass regeneration as energy is recycled towards centers. Negative entropy results from this constant feedstock of higher frequency GRAVITON FTL energy bombarding matter.

Our primitive big bang notions are holding us back from understanding the energy cycles of the Universe. Most likely the left handedness of the counterclockwise motion of most galaxies is towards the forward motion of the UNIVERSE ARM of this MEGA galactic structure of the visual universe.

John Rickey

You might want to do a google search for micro vortices in liquid helium. Rotate a bowl of liquid helium and it creates these tiny little whirlpools

Hi Stoat, I will check out the liquid helium whirlpool analogy as mini model of generalized rotational principles. If I am correct about visual Universe just an expanding Arm of larger scale MEGA GALAXY imagine what the hot creational zone would look like near center? One thing is for certain the MEGA CENTER of our whirlpool that creates arms with swirling counterclockwise plasma light fields that form into galaxies may operate at extreme speeds beyond light, expect the unexpected with extreme fountains and structures that operate at significant higher frequencies across such vast distances that it would dwarf the visible Universe to a size of a sub particle. John