Antigravity Research

There is only one Universe, there are many grains of sand.

What we think we know now is that the Universe was formed by a BIG BANG from a singularity, that created all known particles and that some how Matter won out over Antimatter. Space is expanding from a dark force that pervades all the Universe, and eventually we will not be able to see other star systems from this great expansion yet our galaxy will still rotate at extreme motions and there will still be jets of antimatter in reverse motion spewing from the center of this rotation.

Yesterday I was chased out of the water by a huge tiger shark. This lady was yelling at me to get out of the water off this point, and was pointing at a circling shark. I was the only one out and the waves were just starting to come up, but I left the water--better to be safe then sorry! The Universe is not a one time event, it is a continuous creation with energy levels that operate in a juxtaposition to each other balanced between matter and antimatter rotations. There may be many sharks or people that may not agree with my position, but I will not change my position on what I think is true.


Stoat, I sense some regression going on with you. The point here is that if the Big Bang proponents are correct there is total entropy. The Universe will run down and evaporate. There is only this bandwidth of energy, nothing can go faster then the speed of light. However, TVF META MODEL reveals that pushing gravitons operate at minimum 20billion x speed of light in order to maintain planetary orbits around centers of gravity. Light speed photons can not be used to calculate rotations, nor are they fast enough in required energy levels to impart the instantaneous exchange of momentum to drive rotation levels found in Universe. So, why again is everything including GRAVITONS moving so fast?

The cracks in Big Bang theory are many. The "Axis of Evil" and other indications of huge rotations such as discovered in sub B Mesons that flip between states of Matter and Antimatter at three trillion x per second that are taking place inside the Proton, reveals that everything is in extreme motion. Why??? I have focused like a laser on finding an answer to this basic question of why there is so much extreme motion going on in visible Universe.

If these grains of sand are part of a microcosm that is a mirror of greater Universe large scale rotations then what would this microcosm look like? If like grains of sand, the UNIVERSE contains an almost infinite number of MEGAVERSE rotations that act like BECS or particles just like your grain of sand then how does such a creation sustain itself? Here is my work in progress, I invite you to jump into the water and surf this continuous creation model. Shred this wave, but beware of the sharks most of them believe in the BIG BANG THEORY!!!!

Here is a review of my answer to the question of why everything is in extreme motion:

“The Theoretical Framework for a Continuous Creation Model of Universe that is balanced in Reciprocal Motion; here are the primary points: 1) The Universe has always existed, 2) Space is infinite, flat, and without curvature; only fields of energized particles in motion generate mass, time, and curvature, 3) The Universe operates in a wide range of motion to include infinitely small atomic structure to infinitely large circulations of mass, a wide range of motion above and below the speed of light, and a wide range of frequencies that operate above or below the frequencies of light, 4) the faster the speed of motion by a particle the higher the frequencies generated, 5) All mass in motion is the result of a higher scale cascade of higher frequencies and higher speed particles in motion collapsing into lower frequency lower speed range of scales of motion creating mass accelerations, mass regeneration, gravity and all quantum forces, 6) In a multiple scale wide spectrum Universe, each range of motion has a specific band width of frequencies such as found within the visible universe spectrum of light that is the base rate of motion within that scale, all atomic particles with in a given scale of motion forms an inverse mirror of large scale order with each successively smaller sub particles representing cycling of ever higher frequencies that are matched to greater universe motions that also form in pairs of matter and antimatter opposing rotations in a wide range of ever greater scales of size, frequency, and speeds of motion around coordinated axis centers of rotation, 7) Within all scales of motion, gravity and mass accelerations are the result of opposing circulations of Matter and Antimatter portions of Universe accelerating around each other attempting to collapse back to the zero point, In Forward Time Domains, Matter is the primary substance and the bound Antimatter particles with Matter take on the properties of Matter; whereas in Reverse Time Domains, Antimatter is the dominant particle and we can only see the interaction between the two domains in CP violations, and in virtual pair formations resulting in annihilations and relativity jets from centers of Black Holes where we are able to recognize the interactions with Antimatter circuits operating within Reverse Time Domain circulations, 9) Graviton impacts represent the leading edge of the Forward Time Wave and are absorbed by Matter, upon Nucleonic absorption the wave reverses and exits from a partner Antimatter sub particle forming Antigravitons in a much reduced energy state creating a repulsive force, and finally, 10) The law of attraction of opposites, as revealed in large scale attractions between Forward and Reverse Time Domains perpetuates the recycling of energies and the continuous Creation of the Universe.” john

Once I realized that I was no more than a couple of feet from a man eating shark! With James Bond like aplomb, I ordered a cup of tea. Well, a cafe that sells shark and chips is not going to be cheap. [][8D]

Hi john, I'm not sure where you get my "regression" from. My point about a universe in a grain of sand, is that the fight was about billions of galaxies don't make a universe. The universe is everything there is. To talk about groups of universes is to be illogical. I think we have to be very careful not to fall into the errors of logic that that characterize the multiverse idea for instance.

I don't support the idea of the big bang, yet Wheeler's point is a valid one. When he wrote his comment about the furthest galaxies having to have been at the Compton wavelength at some time in the past. The big bang universe was thought to be about ten billion light years radius. It's now thought to be about 14 billion years radius. Is it bigger yet? I'd put money on the next generation of telescopes seeing yet more galaxies further out.

From Wheeler's figures we get an initial expansion of about 1.5 * 10^28 now that has gone up to about 2* 10^29 times the speed of light. From zero space-time, therefore zero temperature, we have the formation of galaxies in an obscenely short time. So invent new dimensions to dump all this excess energy.

Yuk! Let's look at it from the viewpoint that the big bang never happened. Then we have a speed of gravity that is to all intents and purposes practically infinite at the edge of a "particle." It's directly proportional to the radius but the force of gravity is inversely proportional, i.e., it's balanced. Right in front of the observer's nose is space that contains the gravitational information from galaxies billions of light years away. It has arrived in a finite time, trillions of times faster than light. The gravitational information from galaxies closer in to us, has arrived at a slightly slower speed.

If we say that a photon of light is constructed from the superposition of an infinity of frequencies, and we have to "normalize" it to remove the infinities, then that suggests that ftl, gravitational frequencies are what is doing the actual creation of a photon. The "universe" particle has its positional information stored at every point through it. The particle as a bec acts as one particle, it would be impossible to pull it apart, it has an infinite half life in other words. The matter in it is needed for it to communicate its energy levels almost instantly. Matter looks like a sink to control zpe random fluctuations in the particle's "temperature." A temperature which is very close to absolute zero, electromagnetically.

A little more on "our universe" as a particle, as it's a fascinating game to play. It has mass, so half of its energy is given over to creating its own space. Now i support Robert Carroll's argument that the fall off to infinity of this space takes on an inverse fourth power to the radius, some might say that it's an inverse sq. power. We'll leave that aside for the moment. The particle spins but the space doesn't.

We also have charge. Does the charge adhere to the surface or is it volumetric? The equations for both possibilities don't actually differ that much.. ZPE, if a particle has to change its radius, then it can draw on zpe energy, it's actually a self cassimer force effect between where its surface was and is. What I propose is that we think of the charge energy of the particle as being volumetric but not uniformly distributed. This "random"(?) distribution of packets of energy would be what we see as galaxies. (Not a great problem to work out what their size would be once scaled down but I aint done it yet.)

Suppose though that our particle is a toroid. Then we have it rotating at the speed of light about the z axis. We also have a helical charge rotation around the "bread, "again at the speed of light. one rotation is the kinetic energy, the other potential energy, half and half. The helical movement round the torus has to travel further, so one rotation of the torus has the helix moving round one sixth.

If we lived inside such a particle we would hardly be aware of such a violent rotation but it would be a different view to that of living in a spherical particle.

Ah [][] not so easy this. It's a bec, so we are slowing light speed right down to more or less zero. This means that h becomes about 3 *10^-44 by multiplying it by the reciprocal of the speed of gravity.

For a spherical particle of the Compton radius that would give us about 3 billion galaxies. But, there's always a but, I've said that we should think of the speed of gravity being dirictly proportional to the radius. This would mean that galaxy packing is going to vary through our particle.

(Edited) my hunch is that we should have the numeber of galaxies being about a sixth of teh speed of gravity,so related to 2 pi. A surface of a series of "onion skins."

(Edited again) If we are at the centre line of the bread bit of our doughnut shaped particle, and it takes us a year to go round and back to our starting point. We can move to meet that helix. The helix has a gravitational field normal to it. One sixth of the way round this disk shaped field points to the centre of the hole of the doughnut. We are talking here of about every 175 billion years. Now i think there's going to be a shear involved in this movement but it's going to be slight as to be barely noticeable.

With this model, when we look out at galaxies billions of light years away they would appear to be more closely packed together. We would also see more looking along the "bread" than looking in the direction of the hole in the doughnut.

Hi Stoat, I felt that you did not understand what I was saying in regards to MEGAVERSE or larger rotations. What I expected was not what I got regarding my comments so I felt you regressed from where we were before in our evolution of thought. Or, was now unsure if you even supported multiple rotation concepts on large scale organizations. Obviously, Big Bang disregards most motion and has to fabricate a secret dark matter that no one can find to explain space expansion and faster then normal rotations. Have to run to construction site, will talk later, John