EXISTENCE (not creation) Ex Nihilo

More
19 years 1 month ago #14280 by Messiah
Replied by Messiah on topic Reply from Jack McNally
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Iaminexistance</i>
<br />I don't know what I know, but I do know that what I know isn't sufficient enough and that what i don't know will always be greater than that which i know. Simply put, the universe is wide and vast, it's been here for as long as we can remember. Why would we wish to even know the origins? Curious minds, perhaps? The point is that even if we did know exactly how it formed and when, that's all it would be. We wouldn't be able to do anything with it. We would just be able to say "Hah! I've found the fingerprint of existance!" Nothing more, nothing less.

US AIR FORCE - Korean Linguist for life
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

That's what the first cave man said of the two rocks with the holes in the center - until the second cave man stuck a stick in the holes and created the wheel.

If existence is based on a principle instead of a process - and science keeps looking to discover the process, then the progress of learning and knowledge is being retarded.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 2 weeks ago #14514 by Patrick
Replied by Patrick on topic Reply from P
Deleted by moderator LB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 2 weeks ago #12720 by Larry Burford
To all,

I'm probably going to delete Patrick's post. I'll let you know in a while. Religion and politics (pardon my redundancy) are interesting, but not appropriate in this message board.

LB

Patrick - you ought to at least make a token effort to disguise your stuff.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 2 weeks ago #12725 by Patrick
Replied by Patrick on topic Reply from P
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />To all,

I'm probably going to delete Patrick's post. I'll let you know in a while. Religion and politics (pardon my redundancy) are interesting, but not appropriate in this message board.

LB

Patrick - you ought to at least make a token effort to disguise your stuff.


<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Ahhh, com-on! Why would you want to delete me when it was Johnny who put the religious link up to begin with? I get the impression that maybe it's more PERSONAL than that.[V]

Patrick[:)]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 2 weeks ago #12818 by Larry Burford
Patrick,

Decisions like this are not easy. Rousejohnny's post had some additional discussion that was close enough to science topics that it saved his post from the chopping block. Barely.

If that post had generated more response, and the responses had not moved toward science, the situation might have tipped the decision the other way.

===

Personal? Not consciously. But who knows what lurks in their subconscious mind.

Moral Of The Story - don't anger the moderator gods. We don't have THAT many rules, after all. And the ones we have are enforced with much leeway.

Regards,
LB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 2 weeks ago #12726 by Larry Burford
Patric,

FWIW I found the post I deleted to be one of your more interesting ones. It just wasn't right for this science board.

LB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.956 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum