Big Crunch?

I made a prediction that the need for dark matter of the BB would continue to increase. Well thanks to a reference to star and sky picture in another post I ran across the article that shows my prediction to be true. I read the article and sure enough they are now adjusting the amount of dark matter needed to make their BB and acceleration work.

Here it is, read it. The Big Split is a viable alternative to the Big Bang and its evidence.

skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1094_1.asp

The either/or question of eternal expansion vs big crunch is missing one huge variable. Forget dark matter, whether it exists or not and just what it might be, and consider the black hole...

Considering what a black hole does for a living and the infinite reach of the force of gravity, eventually the entire universe will be nothing but black holes, then just one black hole, compressing all the matter of the universe into an ever decreasing volume.

What then? According to Albert, when mass is compressed to the square of the speed of light it transmutes into pure energy. Bang! Play it again, Sam.

Rudementary, my dear Watson. Rudementary!

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Lotto Cheatah</i>
<br />The either/or question of eternal expansion vs big crunch is missing one huge variable. Forget dark matter, whether it exists or not and just what it might be, and consider the black hole...

Considering what a black hole does for a living and the infinite reach of the force of gravity, eventually the entire universe will be nothing but black holes, then just one black hole, compressing all the matter of the universe into an ever decreasing volume.

What then? According to Albert, when mass is compressed to the square of the speed of light it transmutes into pure energy. Bang! Play it again, Sam.

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

One other little thing: Bang - Crunch - Bang, ad-infinitum. That's a heart-beat, folks.. and yet another can of worms!

Well if all the mass accumulated before the compression, you would be correct. However, there is no reason to believe that the mass will not transmute into pure energy as it approaches the center one galaxy at a time, and the bang would not large enough to destroy the vortex.

Rudementary is not always so redementary my dear Sherlock or is Humphrey.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Well if all the mass accumulated before the compression, you would be correct. However, there is no reason to believe that the mass will not transmute into pure energy as it approaches the center one galaxy at a time, and the bang would not large enough to destroy the vortex.

Rudementary is not always so redementary my dear Sherlock or is Humphrey.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

perhaps i don't understand this theory of yours very well,but,where does this vortex come from,what is its cause?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Well if all the mass accumulated before the compression, you would be correct. However, there is no reason to believe that the mass will not transmute into pure energy as it approaches the center one galaxy at a time, and the bang would not large enough to destroy the vortex.

Rudementary is not always so redementary my dear Sherlock or is Humphrey.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Yes, well at the center of the galaxy is a black hole. We're all going down the drain.. eventually. Eventually, our black hole and all the other galactic black holes will be all that's left. Then just one black hole.

The Big Bang model says that it all started from an infinitely small point. The theory as it stands has one big flaw. It requires everything to be created from nothing. That can't happen. Bang-Crunch-Bang theory removes the Law of Conservation violation.