Big Crunch?

More
20 years 5 months ago #10053 by tvanflandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />I think this is a nice link to explain the geometry and dynamics of the big split. With the vertex being the center of gravity, would there not be radial acceleration down the spiral?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Life is too short, and we must each decide which paths to travel. Speaking only for myself, my present interests are limited to what is at least possible in physics, regardless of its mathematical status. That limits my interests to things that conform to the principles of physics. [See metaresearch.org/cosmology/PhysicsHasItsPrinciples.asp ] But there is a whole universe of those, so I'm not lacking in things to be interested in! -|Tom|-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 5 months ago #10054 by rousejohnny
Replied by rousejohnny on topic Reply from Johnny Rouse
Tom,

So which principle does the Big Split violate? I think I have my bases covered on this one, but I am not so sure now....please elaborate. I think I have miscommunicated here, there is nothing in the Big Split that contradicts these principles, including the limits to scale dimensions. I may have personal convictions and prejudices, but with the model itself, I have been careful to avoid comingling logic and emotion.

Johnny

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 5 months ago #9840 by tvanflandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />So which principle does the Big Split violate?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I am truly sorry, but I can't give your model a free evaluation or make specific recommendations while I am continually turning away so many others. There just isn't enough of me or other open-minded scientists to go around. The best we can offer are the suggestions, some for a fee and some free, at metaresearch.org/publications/PMRS/PMRS.asp -|Tom|-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 5 months ago #9843 by rousejohnny
Replied by rousejohnny on topic Reply from Johnny Rouse
Tom,

That is fine, I know you must be a busy man. I actually already have a couple of people putting me through the grinder, and things are looking good (sometimes). I have a manuscript complete just doing some fine tuning, wish me luck and the best of luck to you.

Auf Wiedersehen....

Johnny

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 4 months ago #10019 by rousejohnny
Replied by rousejohnny on topic Reply from Johnny Rouse
I ran across this abstract and was wondering if the size and geometry of Dr. Steiner's work are confirmed, would this interpretation of red shift be as valid as the current mainstream interpretation.

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2004astro.ph..3012S

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 4 months ago #10114 by Larry Burford
I'd say just about exactly as valid ...

GIGO,
LB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.246 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum