Comet Wild-2: first sign of repelling Black Hole

North wrote:
ans: then i don't think we do, by flat i mean,for example the old picture of a steel ball on a rubber sheet.or the water down the sink analogy.

In addition to my former ans:
Yes, the 3D space frame is able to mimic such spacetime rubber sheet effects, by the consumption of the vacuum by black holes, or the decrease of the oscillationary impuls from the direction of a massive object like the Earth. (called gravity)

Leo Vuyk

the problem with blackholes that i have is this,say for instance i could go to the edge of the Milkyway for example in a spaceship and look at the Milkyway edge on,i now then turn my ship a full 180 degrees,my view has now changed,the part of the center that was once above the edge is now below and below is now above.so now the steel ball(or center of the galaxy)is upside down, now should not the blackhole reverse its self, of course not but what makes one position (or view)above or below more apt to have the flow of a black hole than another?

and this is my point, the flow of a blackhole is based on OUR view point,in a three dimensional point of view there is no given preference.the above or below is given equal analyses of its dynamics.

so then we start to analyze from a hydrodynamic point of view because the view is a true three dimensional perspective.

so now look at a spining mass in a matrix(chiral is also what i would use) but the spin is analyzed from both below,above and from the edge of the Milkyway and the ramifications are analyzed in full 360 degrees in depth and breadth(in time not just our galaxy but the whole universe) not just from the plane of the ball on a rubber sheet.

North,

According to my model, our visble universe contains according- to the last developement- 12 sub-universes, 6 matterial and 6 anti-material EPR correlated universes in the form of a big Raspberry.
See home.planet.nl/%7Evuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 search for "Max Tegmark" and his suggestion that a Dodecahedron Universe is not excluded.
In the middle of my dodecahedron raspberry there should be a huge Void because that is the result of a "stepped" BIG Bang explosion, like stepped fireworks explosions do create.

If You want to travel to the rim of one of these universes to imagine what you would see, then a lot of questions should be asked before:
such as how fast would you like to travel etc.

North,

In my opinion spin is always related to a vector of motion.
If a black hole in the center of the Milky way should have spin
(which I do not support) then you have a problem to solve about the relative motion of the Black Hole.
In my opinion the vacuum is a 3D chiral- vacuum particle based- lattice.
How does a chirality of the lattice can be imagined?
By the idea that all motions along the lattices in all directions leave behind a tiny spiral trace, left or right handed related to the vector of motion.
So in our universe, the spiral is "say" righthanded, and in an anti-matter universe, this spiral is lefthanded.

Untill now I only found one possible lattice structure that is able to do the trick.

I think that it is more realistic to see the milky way as a composition of an awful number of rubber sheets of varying spacetimes, because of the awfull number of black holes that are not only in the center but even more inside Globular clusters and axial to the disk far ou reaching into "empty" space.

In my moel black holes don't spin, because they are supposed to be
fixed inside the vacuum lattice and normaly do not have a velocity vector relative to the vacuum.

<i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />North,

In my opinion spin is always related to a vector of motion.
If a black hole in the center of the Milky way should have spin
(which I do not support) then you have a problem to solve about the relative motion of the Black Hole.
In my opinion the vacuum is a 3D chiral- vacuum particle based- lattice.
How does a chirality of the lattice can be imagined?
By the idea that all motions along the lattices in all directions leave behind a tiny spiral trace, left or right handed related to the vector of motion.
So in our universe, the spiral is "say" righthanded, and in an anti-matter universe, this spiral is lefthanded.

Untill now I only found one possible lattice structure that is able to do the trick.
_____________________________________________________________________

ans:so how do you picture these "spiral traces". also how do these spirals keep their energy(keep the spiral going and increase their energy)