Comet Wild-2: first sign of repelling Black Hole

ans:and as i have eluded to above, this is fluidic since in your theory it causes spirals through your chiral lattice.

[/quote]

North

You may call it what you want, but remember the lattice is compressable and retractable.
In the neighborhood of black holes the lattices are elongating, which is the origin of wavelenght increase and the universal Hubble redshift in a Universe that is in slow contraction.

Leo

the universe as far as i know is either expanding and is actually, according to the old theory as i call it, is expanding faster or in Halton Arps theory, the Red Shift is an indication of matter being created and the universe is certainly not contracting.

and no matter how you put it, spirals traces can only happen in a fluidic matrix.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />Leo

the universe as far as i know is either expanding and is actually, according to the old theory as i call it, is expanding faster or in Halton Arps theory, the Red Shift is an indication of matter being created and the universe is certainly not contracting.

and no matter how you put it, spirals traces can only happen in a fluidic matrix.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

North,
see my other message: called: XXX The 12 lobed CPT symmetric Multi-Universe found in the WMAP CMB picture.

North,

The rubber sheet could be seen in 3D if you stack them. Think of your evening weather report and how they depict fronts on your 2D screen. In actuality those 2D frontal representation are placed so based on 3D observations and forecasting. The old weather balloons (replaced by remote laser units) detect weather conditions up through the atmosphere. This information is then organized using pressure levels as 2D representation of this 3D phenomena. You can do this not only with pressure, but with any of the observed measurements performed by the instrument. This sheets at different levels give us an "idea" of the 3D picture of the atmosphere, although the number of sheets that exists between any two sheets is infinate, for simplification we must choose.

Leo,

Let's here more about this slow contraction.

Rousejonny,

The semi-cold Fractal Big Bang by a Giant Black Hole nucleus evaporation, (like globular fireworks), produced traces of smaller black hole splinters (Dark Matter), left behind as Lyman Alpha Forest traces, and also a smooth chiral 3D Lattice network of oscillating vacuum particles (Dark Energy).
The BH splinters could not evaporate any more because the vacuum pressure did not allow them, but the BH splinters EAT the vacuum untill the vacuum is empty again, therefore the universe is contracting from the inside, even at the simultaneous moment it is expanding at the outside by Black Hole evaporation of the Big Bang.
If the BB evaporation stops (due to the finite nuclear BH content)als the outside of the universe will start to contract slowly.

Leo,

Where did the original Giant black hole nucleus come from, what makes up this nucleus and why did it explode? Why did it spin in any particular direction? How can we disprove this, what test should be performed? Are there any perdictions you would like to share?

As for prescription for the smaller blackholes, this could be handled with electrodynamics and dominate volume. However, you would need to define the direction of spin in the black hole nucleus that evaporated.

In the Meta concept of infinate potential you would have to yeild to the fact that this could never be defined because no greater black hole has been observed and the total complexity of the Universe is unknowable. Although you are forced to define the spin of your knowable black hole, the question of why it would stand alone in a singularity would be short sighted and dogmatic. Although I do not think the Universe has infinate complexity, I do have to admit it has infinate potential as Dr. VanFlandern has illustrated as obvious based on basic principles of physics.

How do you handle such questions in your theory?