Comet Wild-2: first sign of repelling Black Hole

I regret the ranting on about BB, I squirreled to far from the subject amoung ever growing frustration about the theory. But, I do have a question. Where do the Black Holes get the material to produce the food for an open stellar cluster to feed? What is it using to produce the Hydrogen gas? Is there an aether such as the elysium in MM that is being ripped apart and then reorganized?

<i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Such vorticies should indeed exist, as to the cause of such "black holes" that is debatable.
_____________________________________________________________________

rousejohnny

why "SHOULD" these vortices exist?

<i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />IMHO : In my humble opinion.
More complex if they have a real "rigid particle filled" nucleus.
______________________________________________________________________

Leo Vuyk

the problem that i see is this,blackholes are a two dimensional dynamical analysis of a three dimensional dynamic.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
I do not support completely trashing the Big Bang...well not yet anyway. But what happened to the idea of trying to prove a theory wrong in order to expose its weaknesses or enforce its strengths.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Nothing happened but the problem is that evidence does exist against the Big Bang theory and it is continually denied. FTL doppler shifts have been detected but the interpretation is always in favor of conventional theory. No dark matter has ever been found but it is assumed to exist. How can a theory be disproven when none of its adherents are willing to listen to reason and they add yet another variable to their equations to fudge their way around it? Read about the history of epicycles to see how far people are willing to cling to unsustainable ideas.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />

<i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Such vorticies should indeed exist, as to the cause of such "black holes" that is debatable.
_____________________________________________________________________

rousejohnny

why "SHOULD" these vortices exist?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

They should exist because of the currents in spacetime or in MM the elysium. I am not saying that the reason for the comet observation is tiny black holes, I am saying that vorticies make up the Universe from quantum to Macro. These vorticies combine positive and negatively charge energy to create gravity =&gt; mass. The major question to answer here would be what strength would be required per unit volume to create a "black hole" in which matter would be broken down and the "hole" would not be filled. In order for the hydrogen to escape without creating even more complexed elements there would have to be an "eye" like that in a hurricane that would allow "leaking". We know from meteorology that eye developement is directly related to strength. How can such a strong "blackhole" exist in unison with such a small object as a comet? So much to learn.

Rousejonny wrote:
Where do the Black Holes get the material to produce the food for an open stellar cluster to feed? What is it using to produce the Hydrogen gas? Is there an aether such as the elysium in MM that is being ripped apart and then reorganized?

I realize this is a complex explanation:
at best see my homepage about the ether and the dual universal relation of each ether particle ading up to zero energy all over the correlated universes.
In short terms however:
If the ether is supposed to be the origin of all energy in all interactions: gravitation electromagnetic etc. due to the vacuum oscillations of the real vacuum particles, and each vacuum particle is able to change shape into other particle forms, then you have a very short answer.