Comet Wild-2: first sign of repelling Black Hole

nORTH,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />Leo

your blackholes are still two dimensional,my point earlier being a rubber sheet is not a complete depth picture in a 3D matrix.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

That is an interesting point you made, I will think it over.
However I see my black holes as having a real nucleus with a real (non zero dimension,) vacuum particle content.
Thus these particle are 3 D.


Leo.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />nORTH,

<i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />Leo

your blackholes are still two dimensional,my point earlier being a rubber sheet is not a complete depth picture in a 3D matrix.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

That is an interesting point you made, I will think it over.
However I see my black holes as having a real nucleus with a real (non zero dimension,) vacuum particle content.
Thus these particle are 3 D.


Leo.
____________________________________________________________________

Leo

if it makes it easier to picture what i mean, try looking at it this way.

picture a fish moving its tail, when it does this,it moves the water(the matrix) not only from say,just the bottom(which if only analyzed from this point of view,would say,represent a two dimensional picture) of its tail but all along it's length and breadth and also analyze the dynamics of this action(tail movment) on the matrix. when including the tail action from top to bottom,side to side and it's ramifications on the matrix, only then do we get a 3D PICTURE of the dynamics of the tail action in the matrix.

perhaps an even easier way still, would be to picture the rubber sheet representation of blackholes with two side by side. then take one and invert it on top of the other this is now a three dimensional picture of their dynamics in a 3D matrix.

this is because we have included the matrix dynamics ABOVE the plane of the blackhole(rubber sheet).

North,
I do not see the need to call the black hole 2-dimensional because reality is still 3D.
I am an architect so I am used to translate 2D drawings into 3d reality.

This is also how I interprete my 2D representations of black holes see: PAGES 8 an 9; called Quantum Gravity around a Black Hole and resp. Higgs-Virgin (Vacuum)repelling zone around a black hole.

klick on:
home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#postscripts

and scroll to page 8 and 9.

Leo.

<i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />North,
I do not see the need to call the black hole 2-dimensional because reality is still 3D.
I am an architect so I am used to translate 2D drawings into 3d reality.

This is also how I interprete my 2D representations of black holes see: PAGES 8 an 9; called Quantum Gravity around a Black Hole and resp. Higgs-Virgin (Vacuum)repelling zone around a black hole.

klick on:
home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#postscripts

and scroll to page 8 and 9.

Leo.
____________________________________________________________________

Leo

your going have to explain,i don't understand the point.(pages 8&9)

perhaps you are use to it but this is a point that seems to be have been missed by many,simply because(i think anyway)that they forgot that matter is submerged in a 3D matrix, assuming this true how do you get a plane in a 3D matrix? a plane is impossible in a 3D matrix because you can't get a seperation from one dynamic from another.(try for example getting a rubber sheet plane underwater)

my focus right now is the ramifications of the matter on the dynamics
of the matrix.

if i'm still not clear on my point, think in terms of hydrodynamics.

if i'm still not clear on my point, think in terms of hydrodynamics.


[/quote]

North:

I hope see your point, you try to imagine the vacuum in a hydrodynamical way being a fluid.

This is how I started too, but soon came into problems, with vacuum particle ideas.
The next step I took was to imagine the Ether as bundels of fibers.
The photons could travel along these fiber trajectories, which gave also problems with the constancy of the lightspeed.
Then I found the well known idea of the vacuum as oscillatory medium, and I added several new things to it like the Chiral Lattice structure
which you need to be chiral for a "matterial"universe.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />
if i'm still not clear on my point, think in terms of hydrodynamics.


<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

North:

I hope see your point, you try to imagine the vacuum in a hydrodynamical way being a fluid.

This is how I started too, but soon came into problems, with vacuum particle ideas.
____________________________________________________________________

ans:then the vacuum is no longer a vacuum,since now it has matter and these particles are affected by motion of matter through it's lattice.causing spirals.which now implies fluidity.which are not 3D,since this is where your blackholes reside.(and the representation of blackholes is not a three 3D representation of the matrix dynamics,since it does not include the dynamics of the lattice ABOVE the plane of the blackhole)

_____________________________________________________________________
The next step I took was to imagine the Ether as bundels of fibers.
The photons could travel along these fiber trajectories, which gave also problems with the constancy of the lightspeed.
_____________________________________________________________________

ans: fibers are rigid are they not? which comes in conflict with the fluidity with your chiral lattice. would they not interfere with each other?
_____________________________________________________________________
Then I found the well known idea of the vacuum as oscillatory medium, and I added several new things to it like the Chiral Lattice structure
which you need to be chiral for a "matterial"universe.
_____________________________________________________________________

ans:and as i have eluded to above, this is fluidic since in your theory it causes spirals through your chiral lattice.